Roulette Scams WARNING: The owner of the Top Roulette Forums, Steven George Hourmouzis, is a Convicted Scammer

It's actually quite comical.

 

Agreed it is quite comical. Except for the lies, that is just dumb. Who is telling the truth?, you can never be sure. MrJ you are fast taking the crown of the cut and paste king. A dubious honour previously held by another troll.

 

Where is the ignore button> Or is this only a matter of speech ?

 

I'm shocked by the information that Mr. J has presented. I didn't know that there was that much out there.

 

This is nothing. Wait til I post the real good stuff. How does posting "SEALED" court documents sound? Moderate me? Big fuckin mistake.

Ken

 

Ken, anything you could ever find would corroborate my claims. Regardless, anyone can test my computers for free. Or test my system for 5 days for $1. That's why mark was forced to tell porkie pies. And you're falling over yourself cutting and pasting blatant lies from another person.

You really need to get a life. I have busy upcoming weeks but soon I'll probably do another Ronjo style test. First I want you to show people more of what you're about.

 

After the public test with neutral and respected Ronjo:

Steves claims are correct about the Diamond hits and I had predictions within a three pocket arc several times and within a six pocket arc as well,and hits more than 50% on one half of the wheel. I did not have a direct hit on one number, but I had a hit on the next pocket to the predicted number three times in fifteen plays,in my opinion that is close enough. So to recap in fifteen spins I had a three pocket arc hit three times, a seven pocket arc hit five times the rest were losses or they were out of the three and seven pocket range but in half the wheel. This pattern kept on repeating in my testing.

Steves explanation is correct on my testing. The different diamond test was done and is correct and that the prediction was within a three pocket arc, the first spin and several others as the sample spin gets updated and deals with errors, as below as per quote that there were no predictions as the tolerance got tighter which is better than getting a poor prediction. I tested the whole DVD and as the sample was updated I got the same results. I was very impressed with the accuracy of the predictions, where I got predictions in a three pocket arc and a seven pocket arc and over 50% of half the wheel within the three pocket arc.

facts are facts and some people find it a problem to accept them.

everything Steve says in his explanation is correct.you guys need to read his post carefully as it must be kept in mind that we only focused on one particular diamond and we are getting a 1 in 5 hit rate and it was not only the fifteen spins that has been mentioned, this pattern repeated over the 100 spins and was consistent.

everyone, Steve is no scammer and has contributed a lot on RR a few years back and helped me a lot.

I do not want to get involved with discussing Steve’s methods and it is very simple to answer your question above, even if you had the spins there is nothing you can do to prove anything, as you are going on hearsay and not on personal experience with Steve’s material, and a possibility of incorrect application of certain methods by so called users of Steve’s material. I can assure you that what I tested was legit, and keep in mind that I was testing on one particular diamond for testing purposes, I could have tested any other diamond but we tested only one,and the test was not to test predicted numbers but only a diamond,and sorry to say the test was accurate.

And to cap it all, Steve Hourmouzis put me in contact with one of his players here in my country and we met up and discussed the computer and he was getting very good results. I can not let out what we discussed, but I can tell you that you would have to be very serious about playing this way and if applied correctly with timing in placing your bets you would do very well, thats all I can tell you.

So unless you have had first hand experience I think it would be wise and best to stay out of the politics concerning Steve’s computer. So guys let’s let the man get on with his business,and unless you have the computer let’s get on with this challenge. Jackal check this out my testing is there read it carefully.

I just wish people would get their facts first before attacking people, just like in the case with Steve, a number of people have asked me for the spins Steve supplied me,but I have done what Steve asked and I am not going to say anymore about the testing as that has been finalized already, I have been insulted by being called stupid. As I have said I have met up with one of Steve’s players and he is not this imaginary player we have created, he is for real, and we have results from real casino plays and discussed the computer in length and I am satisfied if applied properly we have a good edge against the casinos and that is final.

I don't need to try Ken. The truth is on my side. I don't hate you Ken, but you do have serious problems. I sincerely wish you the best.

 

Then you have nothing to worry about coolbreeze. You still OWE 32 people refunds. When will they receive that?

Ken

 

Q. Is it true that 32 people are waiting for refunds from you?

No. "32" is an arbitrary number that Mark Howe made up. There's no truth to it. At one stage, he claimed he represented "over 100" people in a class action against me. His lies have changed over the years.

It's all responded to already. The problem, Ken, is you have no intention of telling the truth about anything. You are operating with extreme bias from hatred. It's exactly the same as Mark Howe.

 

Ken, let's assume you are warning people about me out of the goodness of your heart. I say the junk you post is just a bunch of lies. Surely you aren't interested in attacking an honest person, are you??.. So, I have a question for you:

Exactly what could I do to prove to you and everyone that my roulette computers and system work as I claim?

I mean would you like me to offer a free roulette computer for everyone to test? Would you like me to send one to free to someone who everyone knows and trusts? Would you like me to do a public demo where anyone can attend? Would you like me to have a qualified physicist do testing and write a report? How about I let people test my system for 5 days?

It all sounds like pretty good options, right? Well, I've done all of them. People can still test my computers and systems before buying.

And if you look back on this thread, the original poster (IHeartRoulette) was made much the same offer. But he refused to even respond to my offer. Why? Because he couldn't care less about he truth. Like you, he only seeks to harm me for his own selfish reasons.

The problem isn't the truth. The problem isnt me providing proof of my claims. The problem is your motive. Same as Mark Howe. When someone is desperate to harm someone, the truth is irrelevant and everything you say is for one purpose - to harm the person.

Look Ken, I have no interest in attacking you and really do wish you well. But you dug your own hole at my forum and making everyone dislike you, and you're making a fool of yourself here - by showing everyone how dishonest you are.

I expect your response will mostly be more cutting and pasting. I'm sorry Ken, that you are so miserable in your life that you spend so much time on this. Sincerely i hope for your sake you can better understand you are your own problem. I have nothing to do with it.

 

.

 

Shocked? Are you serious?

Where have you been these last years, living in a hut, or under a rock?


Of course not. You're just being a dick, as usual.

 

Very offensive, and shortsighted.

 

And hey bombus, you said you're considering buying my computer to find out the truth of it all. Actually you dont need to buy anything. There's the free roulette computer on my site, and soon I'll do another Ronjo style test. Maybe you could be the tester and get an $80,000 roulette computer for free. But it's not me who chooses the tester. The public/members do, just as they chose Ronjo. Anyway I'll post more about it another time. Keep an eye on my forum for details.

 

I'm busy finishing off my house in the mountains so I need to stay on the tools for the time being.

I should be done by xmas, then I'll look into this roulette computer stuff.

 

Attention !

If you are a member at Roulette Forum cc be careful what you are writing in the PM. They are being snooped by the mods.

Slimy Turner was instrumental influencing Hourmouzis tho have put me moderation considering that I had not been involved in any bickering.

Seasoned players be warned to stay away from that slippery place. Expert advice is not welcome at this forum of fumbling amateurs .


The martingale is their Salvation. They are key board jockeys not to be taken seriously.


Caution. !

 

Definition of an expert: A drip under pressure.

You have come into your own ND, now you sound like just like the tard you obviously always were.

 

What a strange and silly thread this is.
I'll file it under "entertainment"

Guy bashes Steve, Steve shows up to defend, roulette computers become the topic.
Guy says he'll try one of those there devices and see how it works (laughs).
people bash Steve - people defend Steve.
It's like a fucking soap opera in this thread but who can see what is actually happening here ?
Might just be me.
I wish I had some popcorn.

 

What a load of bollox...LMAO

Again, bollox

"tho have put me moderation"...lol

Slimy Turner, Turncoat Turner, Biased Prick.

I like Slimy Turner the best.

 

It stands out a bit doesn't it! Mind you, Christmas is coming and it's the time when Santa and his elves get busy.
Kimo Li should be turning up soon as well. ROFLMAO.