Roulette The Global Effect

More word salad from Gizmo.

 

1. Can the global effect be seen by others?
2. Can a strategy to exploit it while it is occurring be discussed?

This is going to be interesting when people here, for whatever reason, have been found out that they never saw this. Ignore it, be afraid to discuss it, fail to ask questions, whatever the reason. It will be amazing. There is no other discussion of this on the internet except where I have introduced it. It goes all the way back 11 years at GG. I took my students at the school through it. People can learn to see it and just how often it occurs.

You want an edge in gambling. Here it is on a platter. BTW, it's a first ascent. Put it in the books.

 

When you get charts to look like this consistently (and it will happen) then you have it.
It's just a matter of the missing step. (Which to be honest I might have explained in a email to your "associate" had you not disclosed that behind my back everyone was working on it and prying me for answers in emails pretending to be "working on it" alone. Shame.). But seriously, your chart will look like this every time - RNG or actuals.
If you get there - enjoy. If not, you'll figure it out. And I doubt that I'll be replying to emails from now on. lol).
I just ran this off (rng this time) with $25.00 unit size. (if that helps).

 

That chart says it all. What's more amazing I can see it in my own charting program once you know what to look for. I'm blown away. This is the first time in 11 years that anyone really helped me with my discovery of randomness and its characteristics. The Turbo Effect. Just what you needed, right?

BTW, it looks like Al Gore's hockey stick.

 

110 spins. Wow. If it was 110,000 spins it would mean something. Still, I guess the "feel good" factor is nice for forums, and I suppose that's why you use $25 units. Looks more impressive that way.

The chart WON'T look like that every time, that's pure wishful thinking.

 

I agree.
If you (anyone) want to post charts, use units of 1. Much easier for everyone to wrap their minds around when assessing its worth.

 

The chart will look exactly the same - the only difference would be in the balance on the left - just hold your hand up and block the numbers if you don't want to look at it.

Yes Michaela, I know... "not enough spins".
110,000 spins would not get your attention either.
"110,000 spins.. wow...If it was 1 million spins it would mean something".
lol - It never ends.
If it's 1 million spins.....
"Wow, 1 million spins on a pretend RNG. That won't work against real spins at a real casino !"
Then after it's in a casino....
"Wow, you won that time but you got lucky - you can't do it again"
Then when I do it again....
"Wow, the only explanation is that you happened to be on a bias wheel - there was some
defect that caused the win... it won't happen at another wheel"

You guys are great - it's nice how regardless of what's posted, you can't accept what's going on.
You should stand at the finish line of a marathon and when the person runs through and breaks
the ribbon for first place you yell "Wow - you won... if you ran it backwards without shoes on,
I'd be impressed".
I'm not sure why I waste my time, Ken is right.

 

Hi TG
Are you able to post the numbers to go with this chart. Im curious to see if what i call my 'Turbo method' looks the same when i run them? Think im almost ready to give parx online a go as ive been working on a bet which involves betting on around 12 numbers based on patterns and repeats to get started with(needs less bankroll) before using the more profitable 'turbo method' and a four or less number bet ive been working on myself.
Thanks

 

Gees! If you can't go into a casino and win in 200 to 300 spins then nothing else matters. Ken is right.

I can blow away any casino where the spins go into the global effect state. Now, armed with the "Turbo Effect" I can brute force attack the sequence of spins any time I feel like it. When the basic conditions are occurring, and they tend to occur most of the times, and yes I mean 24 numbers for bets, then I'm riding a steady upward pace. I can grind away at the concept of the Geiger Counter Video. Now, it doesn't matter if anyone gives a damn. Just look what discussion forums have produced though. Once again in society we have the Haves and the Have Nots. A few of us have benefited from each other's experience. It only took me 11 years and ten billion worthless written phrases.

 

I tend to win a lot quicker than that which is good as i dont have the time or would i really want to play for that long.
Thanks

 

Me too. I only need about 10 spins to see the basic situational awareness conditions. After that it's just a matter of exploiting the conditions while they change to the best conditions. This happens soon and often enough. I tend to be done by 60 to 150 spins.

 

I can't speak for Dr SAA, but you're wrong about me and I would say 99% of other readers. If you could demonstrate that the pattern of your above chart held over 20 or even 10 thousand spins (with manageable drawdowns), I would be impressed. Even a rookie roulette player knows that a system shown to work over few spins has less to recommend it than one tested over many (other things being equal). We both know that the point of testing over many spins is to reveal the weaknesses of the system, and it's irrelevant to say that "I will never play that many spins". That's like saying "let's not bother to test this new car design over a million simulated miles, because nobody will ever drive a million miles".

I'm not sure why you think that posting charts of a couple of hundred spins means anything. You must have played quite a few thousand spins on parx to get to the top of the leaderboard, you could have saved the RX chart of those sessions and posted them here.

And I find your last comment a bit strange. If you actually HAD posted a chart of 20,000 spins and I, Dr SAA, or anyone else had dismissed it, I could understand, but you haven't, so you're just ASSUMING that it won't matter how many spins there are because it will "never be enough". That's quite convenient for you because it means you never have to actually do it. You can post a few nice charts here and there of a couple of hundred spins, and just assert that they will always look like that. It's a bit of a cop out isn't it?

And please don't tell me that you don't cherry-pick the charts to post. I doubt you think "I'm going to post a chart on the forum, and whatever the result of the next 200 spins is, I will post it". I'm guessing you produce charts all the time, but it's only when you get a really nice one that you choose to post it. That's not as blatent as having a set of existing charts and picking out the best, but it's still a form of bias, and misleading.

 

...and you're right about Dr SAA. You ARE wasting your time trying to convince him because he's completely closed-minded about systems. Don't even bother to try. I'm highly skeptical, but if the evidence and data indicates something is going on, I'll look at it with an open mind. It's just that I've never seen any evidence that is statistically significant. The problem is that hardly any roulette players (especially system players) have the necessary specialist education to be able to determine significance. It's not enough to just be smart. In any case I don't know why you're looking for recognition of your achievements on a forum? If it's just banter then fair enough, but then why get upset when you're challenged?

 

I say it over and over again and you have my word - when I type a thread and plan to post a chart, I run whatever it is that I'm talking about and post the chart. Unless it's from live play which I re-run through RX manually and then post the results. (It's nicer than some chart I drew by hand lol)
I "do" save sessions on my computer but if they are good or bad doesn't play into why I save them.
Mainly it's because (like you said) I was to continue the session on in the future if something looks promising so that I can find that flaw. "But"... when there is no flaw, very few spins are required to test something.
Maybe think of it like the stock market ? (damn, analogy time lol - where's Ken)
If that chart above was a stock market chart for a company would you invest in it ? I would.
Now your argument is valid - look at the 3 year, 5 year, 10 year, lifetime charts for the same company and
it might not be that impressive... but in reality - you can see what it just did recently and no one would say "I want to see the 50 year chart before I'm comfortable putting my money into this stock". Maybe that's why it's called gambling.

 

I never get upset when I'm challenged. Not once.
I do get upset when someone is condescending like that example with Sir A.
That gets me upset lol
A) Most people could find a bias wheel if you lined 10 wheels up and told them to pick the bias one out of the lineup.
Once they know what to look for, it's not difficult at all.
B) Anyone can chart spins for as many needed as the "expert" thinks is required.
C) Anyone can play the hot sections/numbers of a wheel with a defect - you don't even have to tell them
why it works and it will still work.
Now to somehow claim that I can't possibly understand this "art" and how it works pisses me off.

But a challenge doesn't make me angry. Everything is a challenge (if you only knew lol).

 

Michaela,

You're sooo right. Posting graphs of the last 100 spins played is about as meaningful as posting a picture of a potato.



"Yo, played an won again last night. Here's a pic of a potato."

 

'eh it's better (100 spins) than posting no results whatsoever and bashing things you don't understand.
No results. I know, it's top secret and you can't possibly disclose any kind of results. Now convenient.
(Note: big pictures (2 this time !!) = frustration level at max.)

Rare footage of Sir Anyone's latest win taken from inside the casino. The wheel was clearly bias but he was paid anyway.

 

Are you able to post the numbers to go with that potato?
Thanks

 

On the dark side of the potato is a secret treasure map to the location of a broken wheel that the casino doesn't know is broken. It reminds me of the best end of a dog turd for picking it up.

 

Bias wheels are everywhere, didn't you know ?


Ok, I have to stop now lol