Roulette More silliness from RouletteGhost & company

Exactly - it knocks about 90% of systems out of the way quickly.
Then, when you keep within actual table limits - you have to account for the bankroll.
If something works but needs 200k to begin playing, it's not worth the time.
The system has to fund itself with profits - minimal starting bankroll and reliable.
If it's based on math your done (lol). If not, you can still make a profit for a long time using what works.
The fog of ideas and systems where they can't even be played in a casino is a waste of time for everyone.

 

I use a few methods but i mainly used two on Parx. One was based on what Turbo has posted on here and the the other ,i hate to say as anyone that knows english football and me being a Spurs fan, is based on what a west ham fan has posted on another forum.
I dont know if Turbo has a HG or not but by reading what he and others have posted has improved my gambling. On sky bet ive turned £10 on low stakes roulette(penny bets) into so much more and have also used this info to make a simple method that i use in casinos which so far is going very well. I get your anger if someones scamming but why at someone who is helping people improve their odds of winning whether it be a HG or not?

 

Shanks,

You lost entirely your 16 millions monopoly profit, so I don't know why you believe you improved your way of playing, at the end you are a loser, short term profits are possible for anyone with any losing systems like you applied.

Reading someone who claims the HG exists at Roulette is not helping people but quite the contrary, they could lose a lot of their hard earned money if they are new at the game and uneducated.

The HG cannot exist because of the maths of the game. Independant spins with a 1/37 hit rate in the long run for any number with a 36 units return on a hit. This is unbeatable, tracking cold, warm, hot numbers, repeaters, min interval, whatever you want will never change the odds of a number hitting.
Until today, Turbo didn't know how long a number could sleep in the long run, accuse people of tampering data when proven wrong, and he is studying Roulette for quite a long time, he is very limited and has problems understand basic maths.

Best Regards.

Tony.

 

OMG, and another progression at RF. I'm the nutjob (lol) >>

"1,1,2,2,3,4,5,7,9,12,16,22,29,39,52,69,92,123.

That's 18 steps".

Ken

 

True i did lose millions but if i'd stuck to playing the way i had won it i dont believe that would have happened!
I agree no one should read something off a forum and take it as gospel.

 

You are explaining you have changed your system for another at the time it was working? I like your logic dude.
You must have said to yourself it is time to switch from cold numbers to warm splits, since the first system already made too much and was bound to fail anytime soon

 

Greetings. I just joined this site. How does one send someone a private message or at least post to their profile post page or whatever it is......Thanks!

 

Congrats Bago!! I have done something I have NEVER done in my years on EVERY board. I put you on "ignore". (lol)

I preached to all members for YEARS, dont mute someone, simply dont respond....breaking my own rule. I never even put Caleb on mute. You are way way out there Bago, you need help. You can respond back but I will not read it.
HaHahaHaHa

Ken

 

Your master Turbo was supposed to ignore me as well, until he jumped into my thread to bring his gambler's fallacy science and broke his teeth against me. I guess you do not want the same thing happening to you, it really hurts to be publicly humiliated when you want to appear as a genius.

Bye loser and thanks for the present. If you could disappear for ever, it would be a better one.

 

"If you are not willing to risk the unusual, you will have to settle for the ordinary." << For my buddy Turbo!

Ken

 

From dingbat RouletteGhost at RF. What is this? >> "same unique dozen sequence in the same spot".

Ken

 

Isn't it great ?
And it always says "Show ignored Content" which means the idiot you put on ignore is still talking to you even though you clearly put the on ignore and can't read it.
It's like a moron sitting in a room alone and yelling at himself - now that's entertainment lol

 

I am just so ignored that you gate crash my threads each time to expose what a clown and imbecile you are. Thanks dude, it is exactly what I've been looking for. Still pretending 600+ sleeper is impossible?. You noob.

 

Must really suck being so bored that you do this haha

 

You should have added a Christmas tree, it would have been more realistic, Ken has no family and spend Christmas time testing systems in case he finds the Holygrail like his master the sucker TurboGenius who thinks the max sleepper at Roulette is 450 and that n°Zero cannot be included while playing streets.

 

I posted this at R30 but in case it gets deleted. Its some of my best work >>

Nothing but a polite comment.....there are TWO rules (imo) for this GUT (or any method).

First, does it work? I dont care about 874 million spins. It either works or it doesn't. Lets pretend its a YES.

Second and *MOST* important....is it PLAYABLE at a real casino?

Always think of the TEN second rule. With your method > calculate which numbers to bet per spin, for how many spins, how many chips and PLACE those bets in under ten seconds.... and thats every spin.

You cant? Then your method is a huge pile of cow shit.

This is the difference between ACTUAL serious ballers at the casino and...well...the rest (sorry). I can sit here and post six silly methods that are pretty bad ass but not playable. So what do I do? I scrap it and never mess with it again.

(regarding the ten second rule), something to understand. If you TRULY have a great method and pit etc. sees this? Your spin times WILL get shorter. This is a fact !!! Bet 18 numbers? HaHaHa

Good luck with that.

I read so many ODD methods at "other" boards, they never calculate everything and at the end of the day...its a HG!! (rofl) (rofl) A few of them, you only bet after certain triggers. Okay, but what is your average number of SKIPPED spins?

Its 40 spins per hour (average) at the casino. Soooo you add in the skipped spins and your HOURLY net win rate just dropped off a cliff but wait wait wait, that wont get talked about.

Everything tested MUST MATCH actual casino conditions. Do I need to post this in French or Spanish or something?

Again, its the difference between a professional player and "some guy" waiving his hat in the air yelling YIPPEE YIPPEE another HG is born and screw the members that know more. Until most (not all) of you guys start to understand the *BASICS*, you will be stuck for years and years to come.

Ken

 

I knew I was forgetting something, I usually do. They also do testing where the mins and max bets dont match up with your average casino.

Like a 7 step Marty....the last bets for those two columns are like 783 chips (lol).

Come on!!! These types of posts/methods are strictly for entertainment purposes. How do you guys take this stuff seriously?

Then....it'll be run through a bunch of trials (it passes) and proclaimed HG HG HG. Completely ignoring REAL CASINO situations.

Here is the bad news....if we eliminate ALL goofy ideas and take into account actual casino conditions.....the truth is, there is LITTLE left. This is a sad fact folks. If you are an honest person, you will have very little to work with after eliminations. This is the *MAIN* reason people ignore reality. They want tons of false avenues to pursue their new roulette ideas.

Ken

 

>>> ive went through zumma and also other live wheel spins

betting the last 4 numbers to show every spin

i havent seen a loss yet within 21 spins

progression on the 4 numbers: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 7 8 <<<

Just posted by no other than idiot fuck RouletteGhost at RF. "Bet the last four numbers". STUCK STUCK STUCK STUCK

and a 21 step fuckin progression no less, GEEZ.

Is it playable? Nope but looks cool talking about it.

@RG >> "Exposed" how buddy? You never did answer me.

I see Kav bitch slapped you around earlier (lol). You needed it, moron.

Ken

 

Estoy un poco confundido. ¿Podría escribir esto en español?