Roulette 10 Coldest Numbers Martingaled (TurboGenius HolyGrail) coded and tested.

The system records the 10 coldest numbers, and bet those numbers as they show using the martingale progression (1-1024)<you can set whatever max single bet you want (Options/Betting Options), until at least +1 unit profit is made. When it is the case, the system records the new 10 coldest numbers and restart.
Important: You must set the Options>Configure>Calculate Graphical Statistics using last: 80 spins, to make the system works properly.

According to TurboGenius, it is a winner because we need only ONE number out of the TEN coldest numbers to become hot (it always happens blablabla you know the story of the clown lol).


Here is the system coded you can import on RX and test for yourself:

http://www.filedropper.com/turboholygrail

Here is the session I launched the system against:

http://www.filedropper.com/tghg

Here is the bankroll balance trend (Only 25 000 spins were sufficient to make TurboGenius "HolyGrail" tank lol)



Here is the summary of the session:



I want to express my sincere condolences to TurboGenius the most idiotic person I've ever known, and all his blind and moron sheep: Ken alias MrJ, Fossell, Celescliff, Armitage Shanks, RouletteGhost, and others I forgot!.

 

Martingale. Lmao.
Don't know how you're playing but its not right.

 

I know you are embarrassed, for you playing a gambler's fallacy system the right way is against some sessions of 500 spins maximum lol fuckin sucker. And what is funny about the Martingale? You acknowledged using it at Parx, and you refused to do a test on Celtic Casino crying about their much tighter limits (1-10 on a single).

 

Its not a marty.
Didn't say I used it at Parx.
Celtic is shit. And yes limits are too tight.

You're a bit of a little twat aren't you.

You need to tone it down or whats the point you being here.

 

I know it hurts that the truth is revealed, now you won't be able to swag despite all your barkings.

 

I applaud your tenacity in trying to debunk a system. But I don't think you know how this method is being played out.
That graph shows that.

You keep making statements that aren't true. Swag? Bark? Never.
Come on.

 

Dude, the system is applying exactly what TurboGenius recommended, which is tracking several coldest numbers 5-10 and applying an aggressive progression (1-2-4-8-16-32...) because in his mad brain and yours, at least one cold number will hit like crazy in the future, and as we are applying a positive progression on it, we must be in profit each time.
The truth is it does not, because any number (cold-warm-hot) at the time you are betting on hit has a 1/37 hit rate and has a return of 36 units, which offers a negative expectation and cannot be changed with any progression.

I feel sorry for you if you don't understand the basic maths behind the Roulette game, it only shows you have a low IQ and also a sad life to dream about a holygrail which will never exist.

 

Disaster

 

Wait, TG plays repeaters, not cold numbers....

 

Do your homework before posting such silliness Rona or whatever your name is.

 

Or perhaps you could do your homework Bago, and link to Turbo's method in question here.

.............unless you just made it up.

Remember...........regardless of what anyone says about your claims.................you've still made a great looking graph!!!

Bravo Bago!!!

 

Sorry theLaw, I don't have a decoder to understand what you are saying.

 

You can actaully be funny sometimes but French! that explains it all
Ive never played a coldest number system as im too impatient. I have made a couple regards non hit numbers based on what an Iron on another site ,that im not a member of, has posted. Some good stuff regards hit and non hit averages, the so called trot etc thanks for sharing!
The rest are mainly based on repeats or patterns or both from information mainly gained on this site.
I think Turbo and others have tried to point people in the right direction. It looks like you just keep trying the wrong methods from the examples you have posted. If you post an example of something thats close to one of the ways i now play i'll say "fair enough it fails in the long run" but so far your examples are way off.
Do i think i have a HG no but i do think i have a better chance of winning now than i did. Can it lose yes but it hasnt lost big enough yet to stop me being well in profit(only penny bets not like the millions of monopoly money on parx)

 

Sorry but the system explained above is a condensed of what TurboGenius wrote. His theory is that a number has a better chance of becoming a hot/repeater number if it was a past cold number because in his mad brain, a past cold number must "catch up" to align with the average hit rate which is 1/37. He advised to use several past cold numbers because some cold numbers can stay cold for a very long time while others will hit like crazy. He also mentionned it needs a positive and aggressive progression to be in profit when we are on a hot number.

Therefore I don't know on what you are basing your thought that I am not applying "the right method". I could do the same simulation betting on numbers that repeated right away without tracking what are the past cold numbers, but the result would be the same. I feel sorry for you Armitage Shanks if you think it would make a difference, you have a lot to learn believe me, and I advise you continue to play with monopoly money, if you are still in profit playing a system like this, it is because you are still in my first 20,000 spins graph chart, but now you know what will happen if you continue.

Best Regards.

 

Dont feel sorry for me. Ive turned £20 pound into nearly £300, playing penny bets, of which ive taken out £100 so even if i loss whats left im still up!
I dont just play the 5/10 hottest numbers with a martingale. Thats very much like one of my early attempts which you are correct lost all my pennies.
Kind Regards

 

You have problems understanding what I wrote. The system is not to bet on the hottest numbers, it is betting on past cold numbers that begin to show up and can potentially become hot numbers. We are betting 1 chip on their first appearance, 2 chips on the second, 4 chips on the third etc.

 

I get that. i said i dont play coldest and you said i could apply that to repeats and i was just trying to make the point theres more to it than just betting the first 5/10 whatever repeats with a martingale as they hit.

 

Post your RX graph to see if there is a difference in the long run.

 

Armitage, you lost entirely your 20 millions monopoly money at Parx, but you dare saying your approach is better than the system I described above, fortunately for you, ridicule never killed anyone.

 

Obviously you dont follow all the posts here. I lost that playing a martingale on alot of numbers because i couldnt be bothered to do a load of bets again(you can't remove individual bets on parx). I still would have lost playing by my rules but no where near as much. Youve got to admit it was good going if you think i got to almost 20 million from a few thousand monopoly money playing a marty on hot numbers. Do you think they'll pay out on sky if i do that that with my penny bets