Roulette More silliness from RouletteGhost & company

As I remember more, I'll add on. Do NONE of these things. Added on >> Hedging.

 

UPDATED LIST >>

triggers
progressions
playing MANY numbers
bots
on-line
due
illegal computers (sales)
rare patterns
tracker (not tracking)
hedging
etc. etc. etc.

 

Holy shit!!!!! >>

12 x 1chip = total chips loss 12 chips - win 24 chips, net win 24 chips
13 x 1chip = total chips loss 25 chips - win 23 chips, net win 11 chips
14 x 2chip = total chips loss 53 chips - win 44 chips, net win 19 chips
15 x 3chip = total chips loss 98 chips - win 63 chips, net win 10 chips
16 x 4chip = total chips loss 162 chips - win 80 chips, net loss -18 chips
17 x 6chip = total chips loss 264 chips - win 114 chips, net loss -48 chips
18 x 9chip = total chips loss 426 chips - win 162 chips, net loss -102 chips
19 x 14chip = total chips loss 692 chips - win 238 chips, net loss -188 chips

 

lol

 

I'll add two more:

Systems
METHODS

NEITHER OF THESE WORK EITHER!!

 

You have your list, I have mine.

Ken

 

Yep Turbo, thats just shit done on paper. None of it worthy of actual CASINO conditions.

Ken

 

You mean you can't take 5 minutes and place bets and then ask the dealer "can you wait another couple of minutes, I still have 350 chips to put down"

 

From Proofreader >>
Right now imo the Grail may
be an Even Chance bet selection.
-------------------------------

So the grail exists through the ECs I guess? (lol)

Ken

 

Didn’t your mommy and daddy teach your sorry candy ass not to throw stones if you live in a glass house?

Proof never bothered anyone and OBVIOUSLY just likes creating strategies as a hobby

I know what you are. It’s perfect. A homunculus.

 

What flavor cowboy?

 

From RF >> Track spins until you get 12 unique numbers. If a number repeats, just count it once
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Count it once? (lol) Doesn't that defeat the purpose of "unique"?

Ken

 

From RF >> but sometimes it takes a while to get those qualifying splits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay, do those people calculate that INTO "total" time spent playing? My guess is no. Once again, they never talk about ALL information. Only the shit that sounds good.

Ken

 

That's pretty funny.
I read it a few times to make sure it wasn't just me imagining that.

 

From RF >>
The assumptions of this strategy are quite good, we play hot sectors and only 4 numbers.
--------------------------------------------------------

Hot & 4 numbers? Welcome to the party. Fuckin idiots. When I would say these things, I was trolling. (rofl)

Ken

 

No one ever said you were trolling or talked crap about you posting about 4 numbers

No one had an issue with you until you became an unfair moderator and started degrading the forum

You fucking moron

 

You are a fuckin liar RG and you know it. There were tons and tons of posts against me. The posts I AM REFERRING TO had little to do with being a mod.

I would politely talk about how to play, my views etc.

All I got was.....Ken doesn't know a thing, all Ken does is lose, he has no decent methods etc. etc.

I read over at RF (often) and I see others talking about the SAME shit I had said. Any name calling on them? Nope. Dont get me wrong, I'm not exactly losing sleep over this shit but IT IS NOTICEABLE. This is my MAIN reason for NOT sharing today!

Listen dipshit, even if you guys are LATE to the dinner table, at least I'm glad to see you. Drop your fuckin KFC column chaser shit, which also is NOT playable......drop that shit and learn a thing or two. During that time BTW, I had heard you held the record for MOST complaints via PM. Sitting back and crying like a little bitch. "When will something be done about this mod? I'll leave this board unless something is done"!!

ROFL.....are you fuckin 12 years old?

 

I cannot argue with that.

 

Still think I'm wrong RG?

 

From RF >>
Here's a longer progressionline
progression 8 number = 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 17 22 28 36 46 59 76 98 126 162 208
--------------------------------------------------------

So on a $10 table, its possible I might need to bet $2,080 per 8 numbers. At $5, $1,040 per? (lol)
Again, not playable. Take away *ALL* non-playable situations and lets see what WE have left to work with? It aint much, trust me.

It looks decent on paper, nothing more, sorry.

Ken