Roulette I found something about Roulette-Simulator that won't please TurboGenius

There are ways to deal with issues and for some reason trolls and annoying idiots
like the one who started this thread take the wrong path.
Here's some instructions for the future.

If you see something that doesn't look right - ask the person who runs the site. (I did)
If you think something is rigged - ask the person who runs the site.
If you think something isn't fair (psst Steve) - ask the person who runs the site.
They are always friendly and willing to answer any question you have and even fix
whatever problem there might be.
RX customer service is amazing
Parx customer service is amazing
Roulette Simulator customer service is amazing.
These are the options you should take.

or..

Run to the nearest forum and make a complete ass of yourself in public claiming
x and y and z and making claims filled with nonsense....
Why do that ? Just ask these people who actually know how their sites and games
work and find the answers. It's really easy. Each site has a contact button.
If the first option you think of is to say "AH HAAAAAA !!!!!!! I got Turbo NOW !!!!!!"
you are a moron. How that benefits your position in any way is beyond me.
Maybe it's just for attention, maybe they just can't help it.

 

Yes, 9 max repeat became 4, something more probable. But now Turbo says 9 was not a problem, that anything can happen, when not so long ago he was crying and insulting after seeing one number not hitting for 605 spins: "IMPOSSIBLE ON A FAIR RNG" "YOU CHEATED BAGO, YOU DELETED SOME" to find out later that he didn't know what he was talking about, thinking the max sleeper was 450. When an event is proven to be possible, he barks saying it can't happen, and when an event is impossible to occur, he says: why not? Fucking Genius!.

So who was right? Of course me who told that a 129 Trillions/1 on a 3 millions spins sample is impossible to occur. But for Sharp the Mussels Fisher and Turbo the clown who claims all and its contrary, there is no problem. We are just short by 5 occurences (9-4) of what you told was perfectly fair. So I was right to say that with this data the RNG is rigged. Fucking morons you guys are.

And now you brag again that you can win on pretend toy wheels Turbo (and that I can't damn, I have no virtual balance , when you acknowledged 2 days ago on RF that using a long progression on those fun games would make anyone win the jackpot. You are completely ill seriously, I believe your permanent lies are destroying your little brain. But when it comes to test your so called HolyGrail on a real wheel like Celtic Casino, you are always ignoring it, whereas you said it was your next plan, but for obvious reasons explained above you prefered Roulette-Simulator. I just wanted to call you a loser, but as you have never gambled for real, you cannot lose anything.

 

Turbo you have Alzheimer, you should apply your lessons to yourself but obviously your brain is ill, read again what you wrote:

 

Technically, one doesnt fish for mussels. Thats for Fish

You can gather Mussels, collect Mussels or correctly....harvest Mussels

I'm here all week if you have any questions

 

You are wrong, you can fish by foot clams, mussels etc... We have one famous song in France called: "à la pêche aux moules" pêcher=to fish / moules=mussels.

I am also here all week to correct you.

Best Regards.

 

My mother only ever gave me one piece of advice when I was a child
"Never try and get smart with a Frenchman on the subject of shellfish"
I never understood what she meant until this day.

 

Mussels like Oysters are shellfish and you walk fish them/ shore fish them. Therefore, your theory of fishing only fishes is bogus Turner, make your excuses asap and put me a like.

 

"I am a shellfish fraud"
Happy?

 

Yes, at least you recognize when you make a mistake, this is honourable, and there are some people here who should take a lesson from it.

 

I have to leave you Turner, my horse races are beginning, there are people who gamble for real money and some who spend their life playing martingale on Roulette fun mode. Thanks for the mussels discussion.

 

I’m lucky to live on Long Island

I can go “clamming” at anytime I wish

Love em raw. That’s what she said.

By the way. It’s term is “shellfishing”

 

I found something strange concerning the even chances statistics on Roulette-Simulator:

Total spins: 3,324,766

When you make the addition of the Red/Black excluding zero= 1,708,801+1,710,580 = 3,419,381, a difference of + 94615.

When you make the addition of the Red/Black including zero= 1,614,187+1,615,966= 3,230,153, a difference of - 94613.

 

"Never try and get smart with a Frenchman on the subject of shellfish"

Well in his case, it's on all subject that he'll try to be Mr Right or Mr iknowitall.

This guy speaks about impossible event that cannot occur as if after a 6 in a row the number has now less than 1/37 to come out... If i follow his dumb logic, i should wait 1369 spins to see a two in a row, what a sheep!

 

The dumb belgium is mad because for him 9 max repeat was totally fair on a 3 millions spin sample, I said it was not and now the admin of the website showed the real max repeat which is four. We are short by FIVE more occurencies moron Sharp, and I was perfectly right, maths and probabilities are not for you, so go cook your fries fucking idiot, I owned you.

 

You should go visit quickly: https://wizardofodds.com/ you are a real gambler's fallacy idiot who confound the odds of an event to happen on a single spin and the odds of a consecutive numbers combination appearing. What a dickhead.

 

"for him 9 max repeat was totally fair on a 3 millions spin sample"

I said more than that, i said it was also fair on a 9 spin sample, it only looks impossible for your little brain because you didn't realize yet that it would be as "impossible" to guess any other serie of individual number, that would look normal for your little brain.

And you didn't realize also that every 9 spin there s a serie (equal chance to your 9 in a row serie) that comes out. Jackass, go back to play with horses

 

An example for you because I see you are a total dumbass: we see the sequence: 1-5-20-14-8-10-13-5-ZERO. After 1-5-20-14-8-10-13-5- < what are the odds of Zero appearing at this time? 1/37. What are the odds of seeing the exact combination 1-5-20-14-8-10-13-5-ZERO ? 1 in 129 Trillions. Understood fucking idiot?.

Now make your apologizes and give me a like.

 

I didn't anything about that, you post that in x K spin you found a 9 in a row serie, and that was enough to prove that the RNG is rigged.
I just said that this (9 in a row serie) could theorically be in a 9 sample spins, as any other series. That's all i said. I told you... stop running like a headless chiken everywhere to be MrRight.

 

I already explained to you but as you are a dickhead you don't listen and this is the last time I answer you and then you go back in Ignoreland.

To check for the real RNG randomness like a real wheel, you check for the deviation of a SINGLE NUMBER, and if it is hitting back to back like it has never been seen in the whole roulette history, then THE RNG IS BIASED/UNFAIR/NOT RANDOM. YOU CANNOT CONCLUDE THIS BY ANALYZING THE ODDS OF DIFFERENT NUMBERS COMBINATION FUCKING NOOB. You are undefinitely in Ignoreland, I have never seen an idiot persisting in his silliness like you, this is the first time I do it and I am very patient, but this time I have to, you are even more ill than TurboGenius, and I didn't ignore him.