Roulette Using parameters to hit sleepers

Delectus,

You appear to have your head trapped in the box called the gambler's fallacy. You need to escape it and learn to think outside of it's confines.

Best of luck,

Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone

 

A very poor reply. You appear to be struggling with your maths. Never mind
this project rolls on, enjoy the results.

 

So you're subtracting 56 from the number of spins a number takes to come in, and this gives you the first number of the parameter, but don't you see that this is arbitrary? A number could come in the first spin or it could take 400 spins. That's variance.

 

Jerome, try to get your head round the following: This project is not interested if a number
comes in the first spin. What it is interested in is finding out the parameter for each
number. Every number will have it's own parameter. It is important that the maximum
number of spins at any Table is 28 spins. I have spent a great deal of time working
this out, so it's a rule of this project.

For this project I trawled through just over 100 Tables at 28 spins for each Table approx
3000 spins. When this happens you get the results I have previously shown.
Whether you believe it or not the numbers will not have the same parameter.
Certain numbers will have a more favourable parameter than others.

This project has nothing to do with variance. Rather than have a fixation with variance
examine the results instead and look at what is happening in reality not in branch of
mathematics that is not relevant here.

 

L P 5

01 071/127 031 01 13 027
02 171/227 013 02 24 026
03 094/150 075 03 32
04 114/170 011 04 02
05 147/203 016 05 06 023
06 137/193 023 06 27 022
07 118/174 000 07 17 000 078
08 123/179 035 08 37 020
09 178/234 014 09 02
10 199/255 010 10 33 018
11 129/185 003 11 34 017
12 151/207 071 12 05 016
13 135/191 027 13 30 015
14 146/202 006 14 09 014
15 169/225 054 15 02
16 186/242 009 16 21
17 077/133 005 17 04 011
18 098/154 080 18 21 010
19 102/158 082 19 16 009
20 044/100 008 20 20 008 056
21 105/161 010 21 36 007
22 094/150 060 22 14 006
23 146/202 036 23 17 005
24 179/235 026 24 32 004
25 127/183 059 25 11 003
26 096/152 081 26 07 000 154
27 052/108 022 27 29 001
28 156/212 126 28 07 000
29 109/165 001
30 069/125 015
31 141/197 043
32 173/229 004
33 048/104 018
34 115/171 017
35 123/179 058
36 116/172 007
37 148/204 020

 

In that case I have no clue about how you're getting the parameters, and your explanation is poor and very vague. Can you make it clearer? You say you wait for a number to hit but is this only when it hasn't come in until at least 100 spins? I can't fathom the logic at all.

 

I think explaining anything to you is a lost cause. Even if you did
understand it, in the end you will say you don't believe it for this
or that obscure mathematical concept, even though the results
are staring you in the face.

I will have to follow gizmotron's example and say" I give up"

 

I don't think I will bother with a Profit Index and instead just show the profit
and loss. The betting part of this project, could be more tricky. I will have to
see how it pans out.

Often there will be only one or two numbers, that have reached their
parameter and therefore bets, subject to the SI criteria, would be placed
on those numbers.

As $ are the international trading & financial currency I will quote in $.
I will assume that $100 chips are used.

The project is currently on L P 5 and flat betting the profit to date is
$11,600.

 

Learn how to win but not with that crap.

 

I can see from your posts that something simple would suit you LQTM

 

At least I KOW HOW to win but not chasing rain bows .



But then again Happy Winnings your way .

 

Presumably you started this thread because you want some feedback, so it's odd that you''re not evening bothering to answer my questions, especially since you specifically said in an earlier post that if we have any questions then just ask. I'm the only one who has shown any interest, the other posts are just dismissive, and so what if I say I don't believe it? There will be others reading this thread who would benefit from your clarification. As a mathematician I'm curious about the method and the logic behind it, that's all.

 

L P 6

01 071/127 059 01 23
02 171/227 010 02 25 026
03 094:150 103 03 19 025
04 114/170 012 04 23 024
05 147/203 044 05 37 023
06 137/193 051 06 20 022
07 118/174 028 07 14
08 123/179 063 08 31 020
09 178/234 042 09 24 019
10 199/255 077 10 22
11 129/185 008 11 29
12 151/207 099 12 16 016
13 135/191 055 13 32 015
14 146/202 000 14 27
15 169/225 082 15 11
16 186/242 016 16 04 012
17 077/133 001 17 22
18 098:154 108 18 02 010
19 102/158 025 19 22 009
20 044/100 022 20 11 008
21 105/161 006 21 27 007
22 094/150 009 22 21 006
23 146/202 024 23 17
24 179/235 019 24 29 004
25 127/183 026 25 33 003
26 096:152 109 26 34 002
27 053/108 007 27 17 001
28 156/212 154 14 14 000
29 109/165 004
30 069/125 043
31 141/197 020
32 173/229 015
33 048/104 003
34 115/171 002
35 123/179 086
36 116/172 035
37 148/204 023

 

I will get back to you Mr mathematician

 

This appears to be your first post, where perhaps you are interested in how
this project developed. If you take off your mathematicians hat for the
present time and ask specific questions about the project, then we can
make a good deal of progress. Replace your maths hat and we are back
to square one.

If you go to post 2. This is the first attempt at creating parameters for
each number. As you probably know at 111 spins (3 x 37), if a number
has not appeared it is called a sleeper. When trawling through a number
of Tables each containing a maximum of 28 spins from my model, I tried
to find numbers that were as close to 111 spins as possible. Some were
less than 111 and for example, 2 did not appear for 227 spins. You would
think at some point 20 would come in at 200+ spins, but so far after
more than 3000 spins it's parameter is 044/100.

The second list of parameters at post 35 produced a much more realistic
list, having trawled through 70 more Tables.

A further list at post 42 having now trawled through over 100 Tables,
produced a list of parameters, where it became apparent, which
numbers had a more favourable parameter 044/100 being an example.

This mirrors my model in the sense that for some unknown reason
certain numbers have favourable parameters. In theory no number
should be any different than any other number. Certainly continuing
for thousands of spins and no signs of a dramatic change.

At this stage I will stop and if you have any questions I will try to
answer them.

 

Make it concrete:

Here's a set of Spins from the first of June from Wiesbaden.
When do i bet ? and How much ?

1
20
0
28
28
26
14
15
7
23
15
36
13
27
32
3
5
0
16
19
16
15
14
8
35
9
4
25
9
6
4
1
24
35
35
4
26
0
35
22
15
8
13
7
33
29
5
15
26
18
22
11
2
14
33
36
13
36
21
30
12
35
11
30
11
5
5
33
26
28
26
14
29
9
22
26
31
32
3
23
17
7
10
9
2
28
35
28
6
36
31
2
22
15
24
30
36
21
13
29
11
2
10
12
9
23
0
15
1
3
3
15
34
33
29
36
35
5
15
22
17
34
11
13
19
3
9
19
33
20
31
7
32
1
18
1
8
10
18
33
25
15
0
34
36
9
1
12
2
35
19
35
28
25
36
24
4
23
32
9
24
17
6
29
6
8
17
32
2
2
35
21
26
11
3
14
3
6
7
11
8
9
5
9
15
19
22
25
9
2
24
24
16
27
20
7
28
5
13
28
8

 

Rheti, the number of spins you have produced has nothing to do
with this project. I suggest you start reading from Post 1 and
find out what it's about.

 

Gambler's fallacy nonsense.

 

Well, the Title is : Using Parameters to hit Sleepers... So what's your Point ?

 

I'm trying to understand how you're getting these parameters so that I can do it myself, but from the information you've given I don't see how to do it. For a start, where are these tables containing a maximum of 28 spins? and how can you find numbers which haven't hit for over 100 spins if they only have 28 spins?

You haven't defined what a parameter actually is. Each is made up of 2 numbers eg 044/100. But what does each of the numbers represent and why is the difference between them always 56? What's so special about 56?