Roulette It's insane ! It's all a fallacy !

Blue,

When you're testing a system you should remove the progression. If it can't win flat betting then it can't win in the long run.

 

Nobody will listen to that.

 

That's a crock. You can have 55 wins and 45 losses for a net 10 win and you can still have the sequence of death that will totally kill your bankroll with a progression all at the same time.

 

Something smells but I'm not the one who is full of shit here...I'm putting it forth in order you to judge me, hah, perhaps you prefer some empty claims backed by vague clues...come in my place to tell you, don't forget to bring condoms...or for 1 time, small fee of 10,000$ I'll reveal you my winning progression!
WOW, the forums have been overrun by blistering morons and long term losers who try to scam naives!
You have what you deserve!

 

A winning progression, huh?

 

Well wait to lose 1300 units (for example 5€ it makes 6500€) and you'll see how it smells! At home with excel everything looks easy

 

SJARP,


So true , but at the casino the excrements hit the fan .

 

I think you are missing my point because like 99.9% of you are expecting a solution served in a silver platter, too bad for you, or should I say to naive for such expectation to be served.
All I did was to open a door, whether you will enter and what you'd find if you've entered it's up to you.
On the end it's much easier to discard something rather to find/discover it, to put in perspective we are looking for the lost keys in a place with limited light, after examining the spot which is enlighten we are declaring that the keys are lost and nowhere to be found.
But the area which is dark is much greater than the enlighten area, so what's more possible, keys do not to exist or are in some spot which we cannot see?
Metaphorically speaking of course.

 

Very entertaining . LOL applause .

 

Honestly, i'm not waiting for anything served... It is not because you think that nobody else explored this way before that it will be a sucess and i really don't need to see things in detail to discard them... On what you said, i don't see any reason why it would work... the ball has no clue about what happened before and there ' s no esoteric miracle that happens in randomness, otherwise it would be predictable and reality is: there's no way to know... or just try to explain me when the edge is coming from as you started at -2.7% (please don't say that it works coz you won more than you lost...)

 

Is this method linked to the repeating number method
or is this another method?

Is this method a winning method?

Is there a connection between the two methods?
or this is a hint how to do it
the repeating method with the hot numbers
?

 

Yep all fallacy!!!!

Lol on the board not in the casino!!!!!!!!!!l

 

[QUOTE = "BlueAngel, post: 56257, miembro: 2054"] Aquí están tus 1,000 giros, he creado un video en YouTube, ¡disfrútalo!

[MEDIA = youtube] k0TP209g8dM [/ MEDIA] [/ QUOTE]


¿Podrías compartir ese programa de ángel azul?