Roulette RE: Mathematical Averages by juneau

Today I am gonna think deep about what you write @juneau

 

The wheel would never produce what you think the wheel will produce in the order that you desire. Simply doesn't take rocket science art and education bring all your statistics and protocols to the classroom where they belong!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

.....I know all about the house paying off short of the mathematical expectation....If one elects to play either the same number 10 times in a row or 10 different numbers 10 times in a row, we are dealing with 10 x 2.70% = 27.0 %; we need 25% to show to break even at a 3-1.payout....but you cannot pick correctly 27% of the time in ten picks; or even 25% of the time in ten picks to break even.... but only 24% of the time in 10 picks....x 4 = 96%...you need 100% to break even.....well...simply view your target (24%) but not pick, now pick 4 times...(actual 5 x 24% = 120%....but you pick only 4....now that's a 20% player advantage over the house....I cannot understand why on a gamblers forum for discussion of play people think the odds might as well be irrelevant....that's what gambling is all about: the odds...some time ago I had a respondent on one of this gambling forums say to me: "what do the odds have to do with it" I almost fell over in my chair when I heard that.....It it is a fact that the theory of mathematical probability is sound science....how can anybody deny it....

 

Let`s talk about REALITY and forget the 2.7 %.That`s no money . Get a life


If you enter a casino with $ 600;-- and walk out of that place $ 720.00 then you are a winner . So forget all that Math crap and LESRN HOW to WIN .


Have Fun .

 

Oh so sweet! Don't forget to put little hearts on the bottom on that letter! Yes sireee!!!!!!

 

Hello
I thought about the groups, as you said
this is a new look at the numbers
I'm sure to be mistaken
with this.

10 numbers

or
9 numbers


or
9 unique different numbers
we do not see repetitive numbers
in as many rotations are needed

 

Hey Nathan this is a fallacy; What you say only worth if the player play once in his life, but if it is in order to win durably money, it is wrong... And one of the best way to take money once or few times before quit is a martingale on a straight number.

 

Sharptracker,


This is your opinion . I am a recreational player with conservative methods . I do not need the casino for money. Strictly recreation. Wall Street is the name of the game. !!
ND

 

.....so, I cannot understand how betjac's last posting of 10 numbers: i.e. do we read from the top horizontal left to right & then continue on with the second horizontal left to right; or do we start at the extreme right & post columns to the left: Kapish? how is it posted?....

 

.....an explanation, the repeaters are of course important in play, but in ours it is used to identify a particular ck-pt....

 

You guys have a serious problem. Why do you need to come on a forum to make riddles with your abreviations... If your ck-pt doesn't work well today you can use the Ata WATA Rombo from John... i swear, it could work well...

 

You so full of f****** s*** because a lot of people use, follow the last, following in the row, the opposite of the last,and all that s*** and that s*** is what doesn't work!!!!!!!!!

I found something that actually f****** works and you want to pick fun at it because you're jealous or overzealous!!!!!!

so you don't believe it and now you want to start drama like I said you're full of f****** s***.!!!!!!

My stuff actually works and I'm up $53,000.00!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I didn't even talk about last night night yet with the $4,000 that I risked.

I have done quite well in the last few months or since the summer anyway. Almost everybody describes the last few movements in baccarat they have some slang for doing it and almost every single one of them will lose.

The repeaters and the ones in a row and the kapiches, and all of that it's pure s*** pure 100% s*** way of playing and they follow it, they win a few and they lose a whole lot more than they f****** win!!!!!!!!!

Why because I'm not white and I'm not a slick dresser and I wear a hoodie and you can see part of my ass or something?

 

From my side, i expose clearly consequences and what should be the use (fun, gamble). No need to clearly expose how to get an edge, nobody cares...(they'll have to make an effort)

From your side, you said you found a method to win durably money despite the negative edge (=liar) and you don't clearly expose things, just using abreviation to make people believe you got something... Truth is you cannot expose, otherwise everyone will see that it is smelly BS.

And of course there is no jealousy, if there was i would invent a story where i earned 500K or a million, observing russian players huh...

 

You can simply play on the side of the fucking house if you're smart enough and that's the bottom line you have to quit all the bullshit and you guys just won't do that!!!!!!!!!!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

And buddy I play on the side of the fucking house!!!,! I found a way and it ain't hard if I can do it anyone can do it. it's just that everyone else over thinks everything!!!!!

 

The Fool.

 

Hi Nathan, did TurboGenius share his StockMarket HolyGrail with you?. Someone has some news of Eddy?.

 

Bago ,


Advice from Turbo ? He should ask me for advice . I was not even aware that he was investing in the market .



ND

 

Hi Nathan,

You were a Gambler's Glen member at this time, so you have no excuse, I refresh your memory with this link: I put a proxy otherwise the direct GG link redirect to porn websites. Thank you for your attention.

https://proxy.hidemyass.com/proxy/fr-fr/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5nYW1ibGVyc2dsZW4uY29tL2NnaS1iaW4vdGVlbXovdGVlbXouY2dpP2JvYXJkPV9tYXN0ZXImYWN0aW9uPW9wZW50b3BpYyZ0b3BpYz0yNTAzJmZvcnVtPVJvdWxldHRlX0FyY2hpdmVfMjAwNQ

 

To me TG was a joke who had a big ego with hid furthest back number talk . I was well set with the methods by John Patrick . BASTA

 

John Patrick also had StockMarket systems?.