Roulette Turbo & Talos

Two members who claim they don't use any triggers or selections of any kind.
I assume they play randomly and win if you are going to believe what you read on this public forum board.

I just discover how silly and simple it is to win, no matter if you play one single number or four number or above that.
Anyone can win and rob the casino on the money.

This sample I will show you is based upon me making love to lady luck from behind.
Flat betting twelve, six and four numbers randomly.
Hit & Run 66 sessions

+106 units won
-16 units loss

+2
+3
+2
+1
+1
+1
+2
+2
+2
+1
+3
+1
+1
+2
+1
+3
+2
+2
+2
+2
+1
+0
+2
+2
+0
+0
+0
+1
+1
+1
+1
+2
+1
+1
+2
+1
+2
+1
+2
+2
+2
+1
+1
+1
-4
+1
+2
+2
+2
+1
+1
+1
+0
+2
+2
+2
+1
+1
+3
+2
+3
+2
+2
+1
+1
-12

 

Sputnik ,


If you were repeating that same scenario 4 - 6 12 numbers position / random you might get the same results . Same bankroll and same amount of spins . Margin of error 3 % + or - .


ND

 

This is MY definition of a trigger >> A *TRUE* trigger is, you start betting (real money) after something VIRTUAL has happened.
This can be after a virtual loss or even after a virtual win. Using THIS definition, I do NOT use triggers.

Ken

 

Regarding Turbo, Talos, and their cult...

 

You're missing out at R30. Its "law of the third" time over there. Oh Lord, please help me.

Ken

 

Did you know two friends of mine are responsible for the hysteria and excitement over the law of the third? Way back in 1982 they were back roomed and jailed overnight in the UK for winning while playing VB. They said that they were winning because one of them was a brilliant mathematician. The mathematician claimed that he'd invented an ingenious system and the winning system was Phillip's Law of The Third. Newspapers and media picked up the story and ran with it. Meanwhile casinos around Europe were freaking out and literally talking about possibly doing away with the game because of the teams success all across EU. And the rest is history. LOL!!!

To this day they laugh about how gullible people are.

 

Do you know Mike well? The guy quit R30. I wish he hadn't.

Ken

 

Who is Talos ?


Thanks.



ND

 

What nonsense.
I don't place bets randomly, anyone who has ever read a post of mine knows this.
You are clearly a moron and have no chance of figuring it out on your own.
You and Sir Anyone, along with ND can circle jerk yourselves all day but will still be
no closer to the answer of course, which is exactly how it's meant to be.
Sad.

What a bullshit story that is, you should write fiction for a living.

 

This is for you Turbo. I can also find some other news stories about it as well.

:American version
The recent phase of evolution of the
traditional roulette wlleel may
conveniently be taken to have started in
January 1982, when two gamblers
consistently won a lot of money at the
roulette tables of several casinos,
including the Rubicon Sporting Club.
When they were arrested for possessing
a sub-miniature radio link they claimed
to have invented an 'unheatable' system
for winning at roulette.
Having helped the police with their
inquiries for two days in the cells of a
Northampton Police Station, the gamblers
were rcleased and given the opportunity to
repeat their performance under close
supervision, but this time with no money
at stake. It was reported in the newspapers
at the time that the team picked the
winning number on average four out of
every five spins of the roulette wheel. The
pair insisted that their system was based
on complex mathematical workings.
TIle casino industly sought advice and
help from the leading casino equipment
manufacturer of the day, who directed thc
author [0 explain and to prove the success
of the 'unbeatable' system. To fulfil these
objectives the autilor devised several test
procedures fOl assessing roulette wheels
(If variolls style., and from several
manufacturers. The wheels were assessed
both mechanically and in lerms of their
behavior.
The results of the research suggested
that the gamblers took advantage of a
natural phenoo)(;;non to predict a
deterministic system and then applied
computer technology to speed up their
calculations. Three years later, Nevada
legislation outlawed devices that projected
the outcome of the game.
Ttle key a peets of their system
centered on the observation that the last
rotations of the roulette ball are very much
alike on every spin (whether initially fast
or slow) and that the dealer, instinctively
spinning the rotor at a 'constant' speed,
enables the wheel to be used as a clock to
predict the ball's landing area. Hence the
term 'clocking the wheel'. A smaJl
correction was madc to the betting mode
to allow for the effects of the ball; the
direction of rotation was found to be
unimportant.
Laboratory tests suggested that the
inhercnt characteristics of thc high-profile
wheel under certain operational conditions
would enable the detenninistic behavior
to be predicted, particularly with the
dealer subconsciously causing the ball to
exit the baJltTack consistently at the same
place. The ball-stop was high enough to
direct the ball (the 'directional' effect)
straight into the pocket rather than deflect
it. Following the results of this
in vestigation, which highl ighted the
shortcomings of the high-profile wheel,
John Huxley lnanufactured and marketed
the first low-profile (Mk3) traditional
American roulette wheel in 1982.
A detailed account of how the
gamblers' 'unbeatable' system worked
was published in 1985, and Doyne Farmer
demonstrated the functions of his
Ncwtonian algorithm on a foot-operated
microprocessor for a television program
two years later. In 1986, Y Gambol
published details of the 'clocking'
fonnula in The Romeo Project. In 1993,
Steve Forte successfully demonstrated the
system on a high-profile roulette wheel at
a London seminar, without a computer.
The house can, of course, elect to reduce
or eliminate any advantage gained
through 'clocking' by allowing only blind
bets (placing of hets before the wheel is
spun), by using the correct wheel/ball
combination, or even by announcing the
'no more bets' at an earlier stage. "

source...http://rouletteresearch.com/

 

Here's a brief story on it via Wiki..."In 1982, several casinos in Britain began to lose large sums of money at their roulette tables to teams of gamblers from the USA. Upon investigation by the police, it was discovered they were using a legal system of biased wheel-section betting. As a result of this, the British roulette wheel manufacturer John Huxley manufactured a roulette wheel to counteract the problem."

 

Never a dull moment . My suggestion to Sputnik to repeat that random scenario was just a matter of conversation.

That Turbos name was heading the thread meant nothing to me I was interested in Sputniks random play .


ND

 

My comment was in reply to this :


Because as we all know - you contribute nothing of value, but are always there to
throw a "like" on any post that insults or bashes me in some way. So fuck off.

 

I was glad when Sputnik posted this bizarre topic it was a change from the bloated baccarat discussions .


Does any one think Sputnik will repeat this scenario ? It was a spur od the moment .

Turbo , do you think ND is interested in that kind of method when I thought all along that the " furthest back " was and is still a joke in my opinion .

Turbo plays , wins and loses his way and others have their way .

ND

 

I wish it so much, but unfortunately there is no exception. And that's what is SAD...