Roulette Repost of 1961 video for those who asked for it

It's almost the same approach Steve used on his forum - unless I played his "MPR" then
anything I said was a lie. Meanwhile he logs every spin and bets placed.
So...... in order for him to "believe" (ie. not taking what I clearly said and doing it on his own)
I have to completely expose what I'm doing step by step. Laughable.
Not to mention it not being random at all in the first place. Has it changed now ? Do I care ? lol
Roulette Simulator is random - they post the stats from the time it all began and I'm
Incredibly out in front now....random... not rigged... no way to cheat... realistic....
not 1 losing session....

But I know - that's not proof of anything.... TO THE BEDROOM CASINO we go !!!!
Just take a deep breath and work it out. It takes less time than posting.

 

Sorry, you don't have it to test.... so impossible.

Another blatant lie from the unicorn hunter. It comes easy doesn't it ? You used to be respected.

 

Turbo,

It's the same old same old. You make an absurd claim that contradicts all of the experts, basic probability and common sense while posting some trivial chart. Next the forumtards that also suck at math soak it up...blissfully ignorant and close to blowing spit bubbles. Then I again prove that it doesn't work by running more statistically relevant simulations, as do others, and I provide the math, logic, and common sense proving that your once again full of shit. Then you start again with some other outrageous claim.

You were never able to beat the MPR, despite your countless user accounts. The only game you've had success with are the pretend money accounts... the ones where you can borrow money from the future to run deep up as you lose progressions and or get unlimited bonuses just for logging in.

 

Yep. You posting lies about me instead of accepting reality

Lies.
2 accounts, which Steve himself knew about so I could demonstrate to HIM how people were CHEATING.. which I did... which they were never called out for.
Want to see the messages ?

Nope, again.
RS doesn't give you any bonus, limits your starting bankroll at a realistic amount, table limits
realistic and not 1 LOSING session, not 1 reset.


Oh wait, you don't have a reply to that one do you ?
See, that site is dealing with actual random and isn't a load of nonsense like MPR.
But I know you and Steve wish I had played there using something I wouldn't explain
to you both since he could see my bets.
Do you really think I'm as stupid as you seem to be ? Not today buddy.
Now tell me - how did I start each of those 281 sessions (for over a year now)
with a limited set bankroll and never ever lose once ?
I know, it's amazing isn't it ? Back to your gifs and meme's....
Once again - everything you post about is.................

 

Turbo,

Again, you're playing another pretend mode game.

There are 38 pockets on the wheel.
If the game is random, then why should the number that you pick hit any better or worse than just 1 in 38?

According the math, and the sim I posted your method doesn't perform any better than random.

Sorry, just the facts.

-Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone.

 

Again, proof of concept. The why. The logic.

Please, no more meaningless short term graphs, they prove nothing.

 

Doesn't matter if it's pretend mode he should be losing to the tune of 2.7% or 5.26% yet he isn't....sorry just facts.

 

1. Depends on the quality of the simulator. I've played simulations that were set to pay back better than break even. Some casinos have them set up in that way in free modes, as do some computer based games. My simulations which I trust and which are more statistically relevant indicate that they system doesn't perform any better than random.
2. Someone just posting a graph and then saying, "see it works" is also not proof. It just proves that some people are gullible and will accept what they see, even if logic and common sense are missing.
3. The logic and the math just doesn't support the wild claims. And Turbo isn't capable of carrying on a coherent argument discussing it.

 

Here you go. Since you just automatically believe someone's graph, I'll post one for you.
As you can see, Turbo's system fails. There's the graph to prove it.
Now, will you ask Turbo why it fails? (Answer..nope, because like many of the other gullible and desperate posters you want it to work and are willing to check common sense at the door.)

 

I discovered that Roulette Simulator recorded a number hitting 9 times in a row, it's in the archive, therefore there is a doubt concerning the reliability of the RNG.

There would be no debate if the person pretending having the HolyGrail played with real money against a known online Casino, but after all those years it never happened. Oops, it did happen with Jek/Elvis who burnt his 10$ in one day. But the other Gremlins who suddenly appeared on the forum recently (Ivo, Nimo, trellw24...) claiming they got it when they are showing different graphs, won't do it, nor Turbo.

 

I can say all much simpler- you claim that can win, but cant that proves and cant that to show, nobody except casino cameras and unknown dealers saw how you win...You are like a boxer which in inviting to fight say, that not will show how he fights, because he explained and nobody understood.

That you cant show and can't prove are facts, that you can win are big doubts...

 

RX nor Roulette Simulator have cameras...

 

Mr. Bago
don´t worry, I didn´t get it, I am still trying, maybe I will never get it but at any rate I tried it and that is fine for me. Have a nice day

 

Genius, simply imagine that the same not understand some your friend or brother. You the same not want to show him and he does not understand your explanations. Not understand because explanations are not logical.
In roulette main is select where to bet. So if you will bet in not right place - will be bad. Now you claim to bet on the number which not fall many spins - that is bad because this way simply you can play on the number with a defect ...
What then you do? Only way is to show, I do not see any other way. And at all why you system players so afraid that somebody will see you in play? Again the only logical reason is that you himself understand that you do not have an advantage....

 

Correct ! why should it be better or worse ? I showed you that it is, now figure out why (which has also been posted)

Yep. I'm not allowed to use a simulator to post results lol.
When I WIN, that means the simulator is defective. It's easier for him to cope with it this way.
Like when the team you hate wins the football game....
CLEARLY they cheated !!!!!!!!!!!!! and when the team you like wins.. any cheating they did
along the way is discounted. He can't prove that I don't win, it makes him mad.

Ask the site owner - he answers questions in a few minutes. Or check the long term stats.
https://roulette-simulator.info/en/roulette-analysis

There was a problem in the past where the data wasn't being properly combined for the stat.
We covered this before - you remember everything, why don't you remember that ?
It looks like a 5 to me, and perfectly in line with normal.
You can remember the 9 but can't remember how it happened or that it was fixed...
and can't remember that it had NOTHING to do with the RNG whatsoever. Strange.

You have to be careful combining random lists with random lists - you end up not
getting random. I covered this too... again you weren't listening and just made jokes.
Here's the email since you're already typing that I'm a liar.

You would have known that it WASN'T the RNG if you had contacted the owner like
I did and had the stat fixed to show what the proper value was.

It's such a waste of time arguing with you few knuckleheads.
I say A.
You claim it's B.
I prove it's A.
You say it's B.

What a waste of time. Then again with every post all you do is dig deeper and deeper
into your own nonsense and prove that you're wrong.

 

I have pointed out other problems with the even chances statistics, it's in the archive, but you prefer focusing on a simulator that is known to be bogus, instead of putting real money on a known website SuperGenius, how strange but understandable for a bullshiter pathological liar, and you avoid responding to the contradictions I pointed out, even in bold you don't read so again:

HOW COME YOU CLAIMED YOUR LAST HOLYGRAIL WAS A WINNER ONLY WITH AN AGGRESSIVE PROGRESSION, THAT IT COULD NOT WORK FLAT BET NOR WITH A SOFT PROGRESSION, WHEN NOW AFTER 15 YEARS OF THINKING YOU STATE THAT THE MATHS DO NOT CHANGE WETHER IT IS FLAT BETTING OR PROGRESSION. SO YOU JUST ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOUR LAST HOLYGRAIL WAS IN FACT A FAILURE. UNDERSTOOD ? WILL YOU FINALLY REPLY?.

 

I showed a long term (over a year's play) graph above from RS. Nope, doesn't count lol.
It's not your circus buddy, sorry. You don't dictate which hoops have to be jump through in order
for you to believe in something. I showed you what to do - you figure it out or don't.
I suggest "don't". You don't even think it's possible so there's no reason to.
I'll post sessions where I actually play - sorry it's "not enough spins" - but nothing is for you
guys. Your game is to discount anything posted (as long as it wins). If something loses, your
ok with a 10 spin chart. lol

Strange though because so called "Advantage Players" don't post their results, they don't explain in detail
how they have such advantages. A defective wheel, a predictable dealer, a computer... nothing
posted showing long term results or the "step by step" instructions on how to do it - YET....
you are happy to give those people the benefit of the doubt. Your own beliefs are backed up by
what they say - so - no proof required !
I consider how I play AP as well.. do I get the same benefits now ? No !
What's logical is that anyone with knowledge that ensures they win do NOT post it openly
for every Tom, Dick and Harry. Some people understood - haven't you read it ? Have you
seen my email inbox ? I do communicate outside of forums, but it's easier to attack me here lol.
Anyway, have a nice day. I put you on the tricycle - pedal or fall over.. or keep telling me
you don't know how to ride it and sit there.

 

No.
Not until you post bolder and larger fonts. lol

 

You are cornered and embarrassed, put me at least a like if you can't answer and explain the contradiction.

 

You would have 502 likes instead of 61 if you posted relevant information people could use.
When you spend 100% of your time bashing me (and anyone who wins) you'll only get
likes from your own club of misfits. I can't help you there.