Roulette Want a HG? Here's One

Correct theLaw, should be very easy for everyone to follow what’s been given in the thread, and replicate the method.

Good or bad, only throwing spins at any technique will determine its worth.

 

So I am testing this for many spins, and it is very very often that I am not in profit after 74 spins betting.. for me it is not a HG. u know why? Because YES the unhits of the first 37 spins will show up in the next 37 spins, at least a few.. but it is not guaranteed that they will also repeat

 

Eddy, do u have any other rules? maximum numbers or something? U mentioned once u often can bet only one number etc.

 

I already ran it over 20k spins. It tanked like a rock. No surprise there.

 

It's called reality. The system doesn't work without the reset bankroll option.

 

o

oh yes it does.

 

without propper MM and the optimal betselection it certainly does tank.

 

yes, i do.
i usualy don't play more then 8 numbers.
But you have to pick the right ones.

 

True, not all will repeat in the next 37 spins, that's why i play another set of 37 spins, up to 111 spins. the numbers that are behind, will catch up, trust me.

 

the LOTT will give you the awnswer to what expect in the next 37 spins. But you will be given alot more then what's expected.

 

you just don't understand.
if the sleepers are in my 37 spins;
18
23
1
6
27
30
28
2
34
14
18
21

i will bet my house, my children, my dog, my car, my savings, that the next set of 37 spins won't give me exactly the same set of sleepers. it just can't. if it would, you are telling me that you believe that 12 numbers will sleep for 74 spins, man go bang your head against the wall, wake up.

 

they won't, trust me.
they continue posting shakin' heads and other neat childish gfs.
why? because they know turbo is right but won't ever admit it. and they know they can't prove him wrong because he is right.

 

So we are at the beginning of guessing how do you choose the numbers and why
Oh damn :/

 

19
2
24
3
11
3
23
7
7
16
35
18
30
5
36
11
17
34
15
13
14
5
35
12
18
26
28
24
3
5
6
14
0
1
15
10
18

Unhits # are 4 , 8 , 9 , 20, 21 , 22, 25 , 27 , 29 , 31, 32 , 33

So next 37 spins.. It could be that some of these numbers will show up BUT u dont bet on it because of your bet selection?
Depends your bet selection on further outcome or wheel layout .

So maybe u look at the dozen with the most unhits and only play these numbers when they will show up or something similar.

Here it is the numbers in dozen 3.
After next 37 spins,

25, 27 and 33 were repeaters

 

@theLaw

The better thing as the system is described you should put your bank account (not 10 euros as jekhb) on that system instead trying to convince us, and that you lose your pant... that is what you deserve bro and that's the only way you can understand something. Feed the cashier and don't lose your balls on the way to the casino!

 

Yeah we understood that, but for now we only saw you bet deposit 10 euros...

 

In this case would u bet only on dozen 3 numbers when they will show up? Can imagine u play like that because u play vs pattern of the first 37 spins. We play on numbers which become hot and were not shown in the first spins. Additionally maybe we say in the first spins most of the unhits were in dozen 3. so it is unlikely that again dozen 3 has the most plus the same unhits again

 

So this is THE MATH???

Jek, as I've already explained, if you track and wait until there are only 12 numbers left, you could be waiting for 37 or more spins before this happens; it could be more than 50 spins as Turbo has already demonstrated. So why do you seldom, if ever, see a "standard" dozen sleep for this long? It's because you haven't preselected the numbers. But when the wheel has "selected" these numbers for you, as it were, you then start betting on those PRESELECTED numbers, and the distribution of wins and losses over the next 37 spins will be the same as if you had chosen a standard dozen. ie, waiting for the sleepers makes no difference to the distribution. The testers are already starting to see this.

And you are too, which is why you're starting to back-pedal and saying that you have to pick the "right numbers" or use a progression (which Turbo has just told us makes no difference).

Random does NOT have limits. Look at the bell curve; it never touches the horizontal axis (this is called an asymptote) which means that you will NEVER get to a point where you can say random outcomes will never go further than it. This is an accurate model of the way probability works and has been known for hundreds of years.

 

It's like trying to get to the end of a rainbow; you can try and try but it will always be just out of reach. You guys really are chasing rainbows.

 

Sergio, why is it that you guys believe that what the textbooks say is all wrong and has nothing to do with the "real world"? It's as though you're contemptuous of education and prefer to wallow in ignorance, even making a virtue of it. Anyone who uses math to make an argument is referred to pejoratively as one of the "mathboyz", as though whatever they say can automatically be ignored. I just don't get it.

What does practice and experience show which contradicts the textbooks, and where are the millions of tests which prove I'm wrong? (I don't expect any answer).