Roulette Mako

Betjack stop spamming the boards with posts so you can unlock PMs, which you'll then use to then beg someone you think has a grail to give it to you...

 

Is this just your speculation or did he tell you so? Because if he assumed that large-scale charts would be ignored, then why bother to post SMALL-scale charts, which he must have known would also criticized or ignored - even more so. Maybe he just hasn't been able to code his system in RX, in which case he wouldn't know how it performs long-term.

 

They don't have the time, that's what they say to avoid the issue.
There's always an answer why they can't do it - but according to them, everyone else can.
It's childish nonsense, and all they have in their arsenal.

 

Again, I dont know much about Parx but you have a decent point. If there are bonuses etc. (whatever its called) then shouldn't detractors be able to replicate others results? "Anyone" can do it--should mean--anyone can do it, assuming ALL the bonuses/benefits are the SAME for all(?)

Ken

 

Hazy and blurred ?? How so ??
I'll predict right now 12 unhits in a cycle of spins.
Lets chart this, hell I have a few minutes. (anyone remember the insane bell curve display in the
60's video where "8" spiked). No different - I can do it with the no-shows.


It's pretty obvious actually. This was 45 cycles of 37 spins each.
So a HUGE amount of cycles would make a very impressive spike at 12.
It can be predicted then accurately enough that "12" will be the value
we can expect for unhits in a cycle - nothing hazy about it.

So knowing this - (since X etc.) We know repeaters will happen clearly,
on average 12 times.
We only have 24 numbers to choose from, knowing 12 times we will win.
I'm sorry to tell you but this is nothing close to 1 in 37 for single individual
spin or "independent event". As the game progresses our ability to win
increases because we have more data to work with and fine tune our
prediction with.
A number can't repeat unless it's shown once. (LESS than 37 will show in our cycle...
average will be 24). If I'm betting for a repeat I'm not having to choose from
37 numbers to be right. I have only to choose from the list of potential winners.
I lose nothing betting on the 12 that don't appear.
I will lose some by not being able to predict with 100% accuracy exactly what
number will appear when - no one can do this, computers don't even do this
at 100%. I'm doing it pretty good though, and far well enough to win.

The puzzle is a good analogy - like the chart indicates and testing clearly shows -
we HAVE the picture that the puzzle makes ahead of time.
It's just a matter of filling in the blanks to achieve the eventual picture.
You can't fill in the blanks with pieces that make no sense or don't fit.
Looking for a repeat of a number when it hasn't even appeared once makes no
sense, does it ?

I won't keep explaining this - it will just be butting heads in circles like Sir No One
likes to do.
I've explained it clearly enough.

 

It's basically the same for everyone yes.
Each day you get 3k (people who log in every day that is... surely anyone wanting to
get to first would do this). There are weekly bonuses given out equally to everyone as well.
And NONE of the bonus credits given count towards the leaderboard - because it's only
tracking profits, not balances.
Steve loves to argue that nonsense - even though I repeatedly pointed out that no matter
what they give you and how amazingly high your balance is from bonus points - it won't rank
you on the leader board at all unless you play, unless you profit while you play - and it adds
up to be better than everyone else's. But they don't pay attention to that. To them
it's impossible to lose.
I explained it with Sir No One's rich uncle giving him 100k to play with.
He plays and ends at 67k - he plays again and gets to 80k, then loses it.
Then he gets another 100k lol.
That won't put you in the ranking at all - period.
Whatever he gets to above 200k (now) will count as profit and ranking.

And RSim - when you reset it shows, yet Sir No One claims to keep resetting to win.
I've never reset once and proved this with any kind of screen shot he wants.
No only do they don't know how to win, they don't know how the rules and process
even works.. easier to just say it's rigged or "pretend".
Meanwhile my actual casino play is "not enough spins" and "small charts".
It's no wonder they can't win at all.

 

For the record - if you manipulate RX results it shows as a watermark on the charts.
Not that it wouldn't be impossible though to reverse engineer something based on spins
and then "replay session" using this info... but yes - millions of spins tested and in profit
would just mean (to them) cheating somehow.
They insist on MPR where Steve sees the bets and then knows how it's done - or -
Play in Benas' bedroom casino a few spins so he'll become a believer lol.
Actual casino play and winnings don't matter - not enough spins.
No form of simulation is ok either.. it's either rigged or they have 10 other reasons
why wins happen.
It's weird - all that time spent bashing what they don't know how to do could have been used
learning how to do it and benefiting from that knowledge. But they can't do it.

 

I tried signing up twice at Parx.. It never allowed me to play on the 00 wheel (I only practice on what we have here in town). I have to say, I LOVE playing at Celtic. I only use dollar units and the spins are fast. Only complaint, they are down for maintenance quite a bit. Reading the comments there is a riot AND if they play for real money, why are they not on the 0 wheel? (lol)

Ken

 

Ken,

Why are they not on the 0 wheel ? Because there are certain bet selections which are better on the 0 /00 wheel .


For instance I would rather play Black , Red , Low, High at a single wheel .


ND

 

Sadly you aren't correct. How many runs should I do to be proof in your eyes ?
This was just moments ago - $100 high roller chips lol.. (makes a nicer chart
in $ profit than $1.00 chips - sorry the math doesn't change)
How did I predict what 10 numbers to bet so high on ? Read it all again
I guess, or keep saying it's impossible.

 

Wow, another short term chart, made up by you. And it's a whole 160 spins this time. LOL!!!

Intelligent posters aren't dazzled. We'd rather see proof of concept. And a demonstration of how past spins change the probability of future spins not more BS charts demonstrating your belief in the gambler's fallacy nonsense.

 

*sigh

I already did that. I like posting these results, it's easy - takes no effort to run one off,
shows how correct I am - and gets under your skin somehow.
Shame unicorns don't even produce wins this good with all that "advantage" you guys have.

1st run +375k
2nd run +182k

I should go on, but why ? Flat betting.... someday No One, someday you'll figure it
out right in front of you and explained over and over.
Don't you use $100.00 unit size when you play ? You have the advantage - according
to you guys it's the smart thing to do when you clearly have a proven advantage.
My silly chart should look like squat compared to what a bias unicorn wheel produces
in profit.
Wow, 1/2 million in two easy sittings... I'd be speechless.

 

Turbo,

I can make charts too.



And look, no draw downs. I made 3 billion dollars in only 60 spins.
There's proof.

 

Turbo's charts are short term nonsense. There's no proof of concept in the form of math, logic, demonstrations of how the past number of have changed the odds...nothing. Shocking huh? Considering that he pretends to be smart. Bago won big on Parx too just playing at random. He did it to prove that it's very easy to do so on a pretend games like that. I signed up as well and after only playing three or so spins accumulated an enormous bankroll without ever playing just from the free mode bonuses. LOL!!!

Bago did it. I've challenged Turbo and you both to the real thing. Neither of you are willing to try it with real money. You guys can keep playing in the land of pretend. Meanwhile, I'll stay in the real world and work.

I don't play around in RX or on the pretend mode at Parx. I have my own simulator and I can beat the hell out of it though...so? However, I do play in the real world if either of you are up for a real challenge.

Better yet, proof us wrong in the real world instead of the land of make believe. Vegas, AC...you pick the region of the country.

 

I'm already playing and winning. No need to show you how I do it in person is there ?
"not enough spins"...

I am. My God you're either retarded or so mentally challenged that there's no point talking to you.
Back on ignore, you're a waste of time. Good luck with the unicorns.

 

Turbo,

There's a big difference between the pretend world and the real world. In the real one you don't have unlimited bankroll resets, unlimited progression, and free bonus money that eclipses everything.

Why don't you go learn a little math and some basic probability and then maybe we can talk once you grasp the basics. In the meantime, your little charts are getting old.

 

This was hilarious, although it doesn't disprove Turbo.

Let's see one of you guys go from 3000 to 600,000+ on 00 roulette with no resets like Turbo has, screenshots and all. If you can do that then I'll take you seriously. Otherwise you'll resort to its rigged or faulty, THEN PROVE IT and exploit it. Doesn't matter if its pretend or not it doesn't make it easier. And don't give me that well with the right negative progression on a few numbers anyone can do that, bullshit the 5.26℅ house edge will eat you for breakfast lunch and dinner playing for as long as Turbo has regardless of what negative, positive or combination of both progression he might be using. So either Turbo is photo shopping his results or the RNG at RS is completely faulty in which case prove it and exploit it. Made my case, Good Day Sir! (Willy Wonka voice)

 

Turbo never has, but I have in the real world, and on a much larger scale.

 

He's shown that he has

 

Where?

No, he most certainly has not. However, I have an in your backyard.