Baccarat Million Dollar Baccarat seminar

It is one of the boldest thing I have ever witnessed in any gambling forum.
This is what they claim:

What do you think over it?

 

Play just 90 shoes and you are a millionaire. Wow. There would be a few millions millionaires, this way, in a month, if it is true. Las Vegas, beware. Lol.

 

LOL!!

A.

 

These are the base bets of MDB+
MDB+ Rules (5 of a kind) 10/1/14

124 progression

1.) After two 2's W/O a 3 between bet the next 2 will go 3. (212 or 22)
2.) After THREE 2+s W/O a 1 between bet the next potential 1 stays 1. (222 232 323 etc)
3.) After two 3s W/O a 2 between bet the next 2 stays 2. (33 313)
4.) After two 3s W/O a 4 between bet the next 3 goes 4. (33 313 323)
5.) After two single 1's bet the next 1iar goes double 1. (21212 31213 etc)
6.) After two double 1's bet the next single 1 stays single (2112112 etc)
7.) After two double 1's bet the next double 1 goes 3 1's. (211211211 bet on a third 1 (bet opposite)

 

Is the progression up as you win, or down on your losses as is his NOR approach?

 

Going up or down in wins and losses won't help much since we never know the future sequence of Ws and Ls we will face. Further, unless we have infinite chips and unlimited table, these things mostly do not work by any hypothesis.

 

Thanks but, that did not answer my question.

I use an eight unit stop loss per shoe. A complete losing 124 down progression would just about stop me out of any shoe!

Probably answered my own question now that I think about it...

 

How many millionaires we have now with this training?

 

Jim...
What does (5 of a kind) mean in MDB...
Bud

 

Yes, the progression and 5 of a kind are vague. Any explanations here?

Thanks

 

Figured out the 5 of a kind part from another post...

"The goal of MDB+ is to average only 5 units because 5 units is all that is needed to realistically make a million dollars. We'd rather make 5 units very consistently and comfortably than to play white knuckle systems that sometimes make more. Consider the following play schedule:​

Six Step Million Dollar play schedule:
Once you are averaging 5 units per shoe:
Step 1: Play 10 shoes @ $5 units, this $250 gives you a 10 $25 unit buy in.
Step 2: Play 10 shoes @ $25 units, this $1,250 gives you a 12.5 $100 unit buy in.
Step 3: Play 10 shoes @ $100 units this $5,000 gives you a 10 $500 unit buy in.
Step 4: Play 10 shoes @ $500 units this $25,000 gives you a 10 $1,000 unit buy in.
Step 5: Play 10 shoes @ $1,000 units this $50,000 gives you a 10 $5,000 unit buy in.
Step 6: Play 40 shoes @ $5,000 units = $1,081,500"
​

I suppose depending on you level of cash, comfort, time and nerve decides who hits the mark. Most anything is doable.

I somehow can't see myself going past the $500 unit mark.

Do you suppose it's all in the bet level barrier your mind creates?

 

Wow...80 more shoes to go...LOL!!!

 

Wow how to loose over 1 million quick is what I think? Like I am done playing whole shoes! I want good bites where the fish are plenty. I am tired of chasing a rare dream fish and i just don't want to loose that many one unit bets to make a single one unit bet anymore!

 

LOL

 

Glad I made you laugh asymbacguy.

 

thank you for detailing this. as crazy as this sounds, how well would it work in practice?

 

Tried and tested method of winning baccarat side bet (pairs). Tested over 1000 shoes. Card counting on a 6 deck shoe where the cut card is kept at 13 cards and cards burned initially is 7, you get favorable play options in the last 10 hands! Now this cannot be done in a casino real time as requires to have your computer, but online live play is vulnerable. Most of the casinos keep the cut card at 26 cards, but there are some which places at 13, which gives you a winning chance. Get in touch with me and I can prove it. Patience is the key as there would be many shoes you just dont bet

 

What is meant by : two two's.....3 two's...2 three's...2 singles....2 doubles...1 double. If you would please explain.

 

I have this system. Bought it a long time ago. Bought a bunch at the same time and got too burned out to test it. Anybody else used it or think there is some merit to it?