Roulette Reading Randomness

A picture is worth a thousand words:


So you look at the highlighted text to see where I am looking for trends.
You see what I bet on for that spin and the result at the end of each line.

The red text is a virtual guess, non funded.
The green text was at $3 per bet, or $54-ish.

As you can see I use trends that end and trends that continue. Many times I look for what the trend is not doing. It's all a guess. But I did find the few things that worked. Once I got to 3 net wins at $90 I dropped to a virtual bet and looked for a very good looking chance at $54 per bet.

I just wanted to show you how I look at a live chart as it occurs.

 

That doesn't mean much to me, or how to read randomness (I don't play roulette).

What does these sequences tell you and more importantly how can I take advantage of each individual grouping?

11212212111111121121221222222121122212111211212222212211211

111121112111212122112211111222122222121121212122111121111122

121222112211122111122121111221111112112122212212112212

 

Asymbacgay doesn't believe in it.

From the horses mouth literally.

But then he gets confused and babbles about unrandomness when properly assessed.


Fuck knows what he is on about, or how his brain is wired.

 

Let's start with the primary function that allows me to read randomness so quickly and cleverly.

We start by taking your version:

and we convert it to a form where visual dexterity becomes useful.

Code:

00.0..0.0000000.00.0..0......0.00...0.000.00.0.....0..00.00

0000.000.000.0.0..00..00000...0.....0.00.0.0.0..0000.00000..

0.0...00..000..0000..0.0000..000000.00.0...0..0.00..0.

Now I can see it better, faster, and more easily. The 1's were converted to zeros and the 2's were converted to periods.

Can you see what I mean?

 

The asymbac is like the garnabby cuz I need subtitle to understand him, too, hey hey.

 

There is no such thing as unrandomness. Everything that occurs is just part and parcel of randomness. 20 Bankers in a row is randomness. A string of singles, B/P, for 20 repeats in a row is nothing more than randomness. That guy is stuck in at least some superstitious magical perception of streams of data. I love it when a perfect pattern keeps repeating for from 30 to 40 spins. It happens. I have seen the Elegant Pattern five times in 30 years. Every time I killed the casino. The first time I took $60 and turned it into $3,000 in thirty minutes.

 

Yup, neat, I gotcha. I noticed how you skipped my prime question...

How does it help on a shoe by shoe basis?

So once every six year, come on man, that's a lot of waiting for the big one...

 

1.) I didn't skip it. I have extensive experience in teaching Reading Randomness. I first needed to establish the capacity to use visual dexterity. So I had to bring that out first with your example, that assumes you could use in Baccarat?

2.) Step two is to teach the characteristics of randomness. In a sense, like reading printed text is a form of an established syntax or construct, to read randomness you must have a construct for that. I developed a bunch of characteristics to watch for over the years. You hear people all the time with formations that they like, for instance, follow the last. That's nothing more than an item in a construct. The big picture is to see formations of continuation of any kind. Once you know what to look for then you look for the quality of the formation. I see singles and double or larger almost instantly. I can see it in your example once I transformed it into a visual dexterity format.

Here is an example that I love to see. When the weak side is hit, it always hits as a single while the strong side hits always at least more than once. To take advantage of that you just ride the wave in its evident form.

3.) So you get a get-out-of-jail-free card to rob a bank. What's your complaint? It's just laying there. All it takes is being trained in order to see it. If you know you are going to win the next 10 hands, because a perfect pattern keeps repeating, then why would you let the chance pass? All it takes is a single lost bet to know it ended. Meanwhile it could pay off for the next 10 or 20 hands. All I'm saying is that along with simple characteristics there includes the Elegant Pattern. There is the Global Effect too. It can be a 85% pure characteristic that goes on and on for an hour or more. But if you can't see it then there is no way to exploit that either. It's all about reading the landscape and being aware. I'm confounded why nobody has come along and establish this construct in over 200 years of gambling. Natural randomness produces far more opportunities than counting cards does in Blackjack. But the attack principle is the same. You bet big when you are in an opportunistic phase. I specialize in micro opportunities. There are things randomness does when you can't see continuation opportunities. All this is part of my construct. It's like playing lead guitar. You know how to improvise over the key and hit key tones in sequence with the music.

 

In few words, you don't want to establish rules because it would be too easy to notice that the system doesn't work either...

 

Forget reading tea leaves please post your bets .

 

Exactly, for a second I thought Gizmo might have thought I was going to engage him teach me how to read random (LOL).

Give it up fella, no chance of that ever happening, you'll have to fish elsewhere for suckers.

 

You can have rules. But you had better have rules that take into account the three phases of effectiveness. I wrote rules into an AI version of my double dozens practicing software. All I did was work on a few data points. That alone took more than three rules for each possibility of some 8 pattern types that I specifically targeted. I applied those conditions to 12 sets from 4 individual and unique groupings. Now to do a well thought out AI scenario for 18 numbers, once again, 12 sets from 6 unique groupings, we are talking about hundreds of rules written in Object Oriented Programming style to be applied thousands of times across the 6 groupings. Well that is just a nebulous undertaking. And that stuff is not even hard coded. I wrote the AI version of my practice software because I always said I would some day do it. I don't need it though. The human brain, properly trained, can do a better job.

Here is a simple rule that works. A first time loss is an indication that a perfect executing pattern has begun to end. If the pattern is of 85% quality or better then an occasional lost bet is to be expected. If losses only occur as singles then continue until hitting two lost bets in a row. You fit the correct rules to the matching patterns.

Or you don't because you are not trained or aware of current conditions. Being ignorant of sophisticated analytics does not trend to well in a world of critical thinkers. Being stuffed full of magical thinking is even a worst condition to be in. These phases of searching for a way to become a professional player and to make a living off of gambling are all prerequisite requirements of gathering all the important experience to achieve one's goal. Anyone can be an obnoxious pest while being oblivious or complacent to the effort required to learn. It's all bullshit anyway.

 

"You buy the guy books, send him to school, and all he wants to do is fuck the teacher."

This is too funny for words. JK is a magical thinker full of superstitions. I give you all the space you need to exhaust yourself in magical beliefs. Phase one is progressions and rule based MM. Next is magical superstitions and beliefs. Last is MM based on conditional awareness. I thought you were an experienced player. You are a wonderful writer. I'm sort of amazed that you are standing up for magical talents that can't possibly or logically exist. If dealers can target losses for the casino then they can target winners for their new friends. It's just too funny to see that throng of arrested dealers out there in the news. If this were possible there would be arrested dealers all over the world. Human nature dictates this much at least. But go ahead smart guy. Fear the wheel. Gads, this must be a joke you are pulling out of pure boredom. Please say it's all a well written joke?

 

The only time I am interested in a pattern if I pre planned before going to the casino to consider


Barstos principle of diminishing probabilities for a few rounds at the roulette table .


ND




ND

 

So let's not learn this together:

This is common place randomness:

Code:

| 1 | 2 | 3 |  | B  R | O  E | L  H |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
| X |   |   |  |    X |    X | X    |
|   |   | X |  | X    |    X |    X |
|   | X |   |  |    X |    X | X    |
|   | X |   |  | X    |    X |    X |
|   |   | X |  |    X |    X |    X |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
|   | X |   |  |    X |    X | X    |
|   | X |   |  |    X |    X | X    |
|   | X |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
| X |   |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
|   | X |   |  | X    |    X |    X |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
|   |   | X |  |    X |    X |    X |
|   |   | X |  | X    | X    |    X |
|   | X |   |  | X    |    X |    X |
|   | X |   |  |    X | X    |    X |
|   |   | X |  |    X |    X |    X |
| X |   |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
|   |   | X |  | X    | X    |    X |
|   | X |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
|   | X |   |  | X    |    X |    X |
|   | X |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
|   | X |   |  |    X | X    |    X |
|   | X |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
|   | X |   |  | X    |    X |    X |
|   | X |   |  |    X | X    |    X |
|   |   | X |  | X    | X    |    X |
| X |   |   |  |    X | X    | X    |
|   |   | X |  | X    |    X |    X |
|   |   | X |  | X    | X    |    X |
|   | X |   |  | X    |    X |    X |
|   |   | X |  |    X | X    |    X |
| X |   |   |  |    X | X    | X    |
|   |   | X |  |    X | X    |    X |
|   | X |   |  |    X |    X | X    |
| X |   |   |  |    X | X    | X    |
|   | X |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
|   |   | X |  |    X |    X |    X |
| X |   |   |  |    X |    X | X    |
| X |   |   |  |    X | X    | X    |
|   | X |   |  |    X |    X | X    |
|   |   | X |  |    X |    X |    X |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
|-----------------------------------|
|   | X |   |  |    X | X    |    X |
|   | X |   |  | X    |    X |    X |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
|   |   | X |  | X    | X    |    X |
|   | X |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
|   | X |   |  | X    |    X |    X |
|   | X |   |  |    X | X    |    X |
| X |   |   |  | X    |    X | X    |
|   | X |   |  | X    | X    | X    |
|   |   | X |  |    X |    X |    X |
|-----------------------------------|

Notice that the Black / Red section, that the weak side hits as singles or an occasional double while the strong side is much stronger. Of course this requires that the dealer is in fact your friend.

 

Have you ever known me to peddle something or look for mugs on the web in the last 15 or so years?

If you could do what you claim, you wouldn't be fishing around for customers, that tells me all I need to know.

Fuck the wheel, it's not my game, I've already pulled in 260 units since Friday evening, will attempt take that to 300 later on, then it's cash out baabby. Vegas here I come (LOL)

 

You are really good. And no I have never seen you scam people. That's why I was thinking this is a well thought out "Baloney Festival." But that does not matter. At some point a few days ago somebody suggested that you could show people what really works and they won't get it. I thought about it for a while and decided you are right. You asked me to start my own thread if I were going to do that so I did. This is that thread.

I'm really teaching how to read randomness and it is exactly like I did it when I charged money. Before a person can use tactics and strategies they must first obtain the skills needed to see potential opportunities. These skills are used to reveal the effectiveness states too. All this is important and must be prerequisite skill before moving on to the more important strategies. It's free as long as I see no danger in teaching it. So I still believe that smart people will reject it. That's my little massive joke on the world. Give them what really works because they could not possibly believe that someone would be stupid enough to give away something of value. This perhaps is my own magical belief.

 

Thank fuck for that. Didn't want you polluting my thread with this garbage.

Precisely.

Go take your meds and have a lie down, you might feel better tomorrow.

 

So Junket King doesn't handle disagreement any better than Glenn does. There's a lot of that going on.

Back to not seeing randomness:

Code:

| B  R |    #
|    X | -- 01
|------| -- 02
|    X | -- 03
|    X | -- 04
|    X | -- 05
| X    | -- 06
|    X | -- 07
|    X | -- 08
| X    | -- 09
|    X | -- 10
|    X | -- 11
|    X | -- 12
| X    | -- 13
|    X | -- 14
| X    | -- 15
|    X | -- 16
|    X | -- 17
|    X | -- 18
| X    | -- 19
|    X | -- 20
| X    | -- 21
|    X | -- 22
|    X | -- 23
| X    | -- 24
|    X | -- 25
| X    | -- 26
| X    | -- 27
| X    | -- 28
|    X | -- 29
| X    | -- 30
|    X | -- 31
|    X | -- 32
| X    | -- 33
| X    | -- 34
| X    | -- 35
|    X | -- 36
|    X | -- 37
| X    | -- 38
|    X | -- 39
|-----| -- 40
| X    | -- 41
| X    | -- 42
| X    | -- 43
|    X | -- 44
| X    | -- 45
|    X | -- 46
|    X | -- 47
| X    | -- 48
| X    | -- 49
|    X | -- 50
|    X | -- 51
| X    | -- 52
| X    | -- 53
|    X | -- 54
| X    | -- 55
|    X | -- 56
| X    | -- 57
| X    | -- 58
| X    | -- 59
|    X | -- 60
| X    | -- 61
|    X | -- 62
|    X | -- 63
|    X | -- 64
| X    | -- 65
| X    | -- 66
| X    | -- 67
| X    | -- 68
| X    | -- 69
|    X | -- 70
| X    | -- 71
| X    | -- 72
| X    | -- 73
| X    | -- 74
| X    | -- 75
| X    | -- 76
| X    | -- 77
|    X | -- 78
| X    | -- 79
| X    | -- 80
| X    | -- 81
| X    | -- 82
| X    | -- 83
| X    | -- 84
|    X | -- 85
| X    | -- 86
| X    | -- 87
|    X | -- 88
|    X | -- 89
|    X | -- 90
| X    | -- 91
|    X | -- 92
|    X | -- 93
| X    | -- 94
| X    | -- 95
|    X | -- 96
| X    | -- 97
| X    | -- 98
| X    | -- 99

I rewrote my online gambling app to just show the Black /Red chart and the number of that spin as a reference. Now all you can see is what I mean when I teach. Today's lesson is on seeing a common and simple characteristic. This single aspect chart could be for Baccarat, Blackjack or Craps as well as for Roulette.

From line 1 to 26 Black always hits as a single. This is a common enough formation. If it holds up for a while, and it really does, you can strike a winning blow on Red right after each Black single. This holds up long enough to win 3 net big win bets. You play it until it no longer holds up. There are variations of smaller bets to bet more on the Red domination too. But the single Black streak is a monster winner.

Now look at Black dominate from lines 65 to 87. Black is the monster while Red hits as singles only. Imagine not knowing how to exploit this. Oh, that's right, it's garbage. I've heard all the excuses in the world about how nobody can know when to jump in on this stuff. Well here is the secret. You jump in and if you are in the favorable effectiveness zone then you keep going. If you are in the losing streak zone then you stop making big bets.You win by attrition. In other words you win the session. All you need is a few more wins than losses. How much you need to win is far more important than just blazing away to be the big winner. You must hold on to your money while you wait for these opportunities. No digging deep holes.

 

its ok after the fact the results but running gameplay without the history here is different..no disrespect gizmo..

what bets and units would you play in this example and why?...

i,ll follow this thread and see and look why you make decisions..no one has anything to lose except time and try to understand why you make decisions...that basis then with your reply can be tested