Baccarat Live B+M Shoes

Good job...

Is your base unit the table minimum?

 

Thanks, nope it's a bit more than the table minimum which is £2

 

What a crazy shoe.

Hey, it is one thing looking at the bloody thing, it is another watching it unfold hand by hand.

Lazy shufflers on the grave yard shift once again, who really don't give a toss.



While I made units on it, it was frustrating as hell to play.

Patience shot to fuck, have to call it a night, 33u short of goal, been struggling too much, approx 40u to the good.

I blame the dickhead R19

 

Try nor to get caught up in short term happenings and take the long term view. Over time most shoe won't give ya too much trouble, hey hey.

 

I was just thinking about what you posted regarding Bruce Irwins Labby. Every time I get into trouble, it is because and only because, I have continued to bet a single string instead of spreading the load between strings. You sort of get wrapped up in expecting a win and the bets escalate out of control. Gotta get a handle on it.

 

Nuts, just logged to browse for a nosey, happened to notice a 7 Banker streak, which went to 8 hands then the Tie, so I'm thinking, a quick unit. Jesus, once your committed, you're committed.!!!

The 1-2-3-5 soon turned into a Martingale, then a Grand Martingale,




An Everyday event

 

A nervy 26u profit, kinda ironic that was my goal deficit from last nights session.

The rest of the shoe.

 

When I use a modify midas labby style I eventually got to the point where I just abandon a string after I lost a bet of a certain high units value. I would just treat it like a progressions bust and start another string knowing that yer gonna win most strings fairly easy. The Bruce Irwin say that he never lost but I imagine at time he must have made some very large units bets, hey hey.

 

K'nell

 

Have a question

Did you ever record a shoe

Then bet against that shoe on the next shoe? Flat bet?

 

I've tried that in the past, not only have I seen the first 7 hands of the prior shoe repeat way too often. What generally happens, is everything is holding it's own, then you get one small section were 5 or 6 hands repeat. However I wasn't flat betting.

I've even tracked 5Col-AM3 template option, noted were it has failed in the prior shoe and only taken that specific 5-Col bet in the exact same spot, only for it to fail again. Nuts absolutely nuts. I suppose that's what you get for anthropomorphising the game.

Here's another crazy shoe from a short while ago, result of lousy shuffle procedures.

You can see from the tables stats were the majority of players are betting, most bet against a run after 6, I was late to the party and after seeing it at 10 went Anti-Streak



The shoes are so weird in this joint, I no longer bet AS6, maybe after 10 hands I'll have a small nibble, if it doesn't get in the way of anything else I'm doing.

 

Here ya go Soxfan

Parlaying Banker wins would drive anybody totally bat-shit INSANE



Nuts. However, more like a real world B&M shoes than most. Single B's, so prevalent, I started betting for the double B.

 

Another Sure-Win bet Bank only ball buster shoe, this came directly after the one above.

Was running 31 Punto's to 13 Banco's at one stage.

 

I guess you're cherry picking those shoes? If you get a lot of shoes like that I would think you could easily beat them. I wouldn't have much trouble with any of the ones you posted. But I don't believe necessarily in clumpy shuffle providing shoes that tend to be dominant streak or dominant chop. I'd really like to see something like 25 or 50 shoes in a row before I would consider that the shuffle is responsible.

Again, if the majority of shoes are like those you post should be an easy clean up.

 

reminds us of punto mondays, wipe the chinese playars

 

LOL, it's like they just want to give away tax-free money.

43u I picked up from first shoe after my nose-bag.



Doing so well wanted to quit and protect, so waited for the last lost (yellow). Template options nervy start column 3, but resolved end of column 3. Half way of the long Banco streak, just stayed with it, ditto the Punto streak, was half expecting chops, so after losing 1u, then 2u, bet 3u and rode the rest until I lost 1 bet and said fuck it.

Coffee, piklets, smoko then back to work <snigger>...

 

Patience all used up, tank is empty, cursing each and every single losing hand, time to call it a night/morning like a good Pro, hate to be ranked as a amateur the smoke and mirrors fraternity sacre bleu. Wanted 800 units today, had a bit of rough start, down 2 units after first session. Settling for approx 600, there's always tomorrow, casino ain't going nowhere

 

I am curious as to if you make your living on playing baccarat, or if you have a job and play baccarat in your off time? I have to work myself, and do not play because I cannot profit in testing. My labby variation I posted still has not failed, but it has had instances where I knew I would not have survived in live play because the bets got too big. When a bet is as big as my weekly paycheck, I may be able to place it in testing, but I would not be able to do it in live play. All the profit, and then some, is wiped out because of that.

 

Here, we have 24 failed attempts to secure back to back wins on Banker. And it wasn't with a long string of losses with a huge P streak. It's very similar to the 35 failed attempts I recorded with a different bet selection. A long streak of single wins punctuated by short streaks of losses. Just a few more 3P streaks, and we've had seen it here. Improbable? yes. Impossible? no.

 

are you professional player?

making 600 units of chips would equal at least $15,000 for 25.00 chips the very smallest i seen allowed wagering each time. why not stopping at 50 units each time without loss of sessions?