Roulette Reading Randomness

Cheers Mark, I will keep using your software to record my sessions. Export every session to a .txt file and add the data up at the end.

 

Mark I thought this Gent was reporting live play . The testing brigade is alive and well.


ND

 

+Maybe Frankg is the one with NON FICTION reports from the Casino trenches .




ND

 

This is not the testing brigade. He is learning how to read randomness. He is gaining experience. He is learning the differences between easy wins and difficult wars. The practice software is as real world as it can get. Just because crash test dummies like to test ridiculous rule based systems does not mean that your conjecture needs to clutter what is really happening here. You are totally wrong. I would not send anyone into battle unarmed. And just because you don't actually keep up by reading what is going on right underneath your own nose does not give you the capacity to pass your judgment on what you think it was. You are exposed. This process of learning will continue.

 

Like I said before. The suggestion of Junket King is getting more true by the minute. There is no danger in teaching a real working method in front of people here.

 

mark,


I appreciate your explanation to clear up some misunderstanding .


ND

 

Here's a handy session from yesterday.

I noticed a strong trend had appeared in the low / high section. The highs were hitting in clusters and the lows were hitting as singles.The clustering in the high section stopped at spin #22, which allowed me to record a quick win and a loss. However the lows continued to hit as singles. I decided to ride this trend home until it changed. You can see the trend lasted from spin #9 until spin #30. A high of +108 units was reached at spin #28. The trend changed with a loss at spin #30. No damage done!

I was happy to finish the session with +90 units.

 

Amazing how some cat can identify the trend after the facts, hey hey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Gamblers fallacy

 

All systems are based on gamblers fallacy

We understand this fully

It’s no secret

The trick, is limiting exposure, using that progression in spurts and quitting while ahead

Limit. Exposure.

 

"Stupid is as stupid does." The practice software makes you place a bet before you hit Spin. If you don't it records the result as "No Bet" and ND in the win/loss column. He is identifying the trend in the middle of it and winning as the trend continues. I sent him special pills so that he can see into the future. Isn't it "amazing" how you can't even see the middles of a trend?

So you are a beat-off sock fan. That's not surprising or amazing.

 

Just so that you know. The hard core skeptics can't be reached and they are showing signs of listening to you. It's the people that don't comment that are trying this on their owns that matter. I know you have not decided yet if this is real. That's good. You need a lot of sessions to decide that you have gone far beyond statistical probability that this will reverse. Once you are there you will also have many session examples to consider what type they are. That experience of identifying a session type is the foundation. This is going very slowly like I figured it would. Their's plenty of time to take down a few casinos.

 

No worries Mark, I approach every method / system with a healthy dose of skepticism. That's the good thing about roulette, you simply test everything thoroughly to see if it succeeds or fails. No question, this method is showing early promise. Plenty of testing still to do. Don't worry, I'll keep trying to break it!

 

Here's some advice. Don't chase your losses.

 

It's not always necessary to test a system in order to determine if it works.

There's proof of concept using logic. For example, how does the system over come the house edge?

 

That's nice forum destroyer. This is not system testing. I already know that it blows the house edge away. This is reading randomness, a skill. This is time spent to see if anyone can learn a skill. Nobody needs to explain anything to you. You are not qualified to offer peer review anyway. This will take math that hasn't even been invented yet to explain. Not secret math, not hidden math. Math that has yet to exist and then will define what is logic in all of this. You have no clue what that is.

So mister wizard, show us the logic of knowing how long a trend will last, when it will start, and when it will end. Let's see how wonderful you at spying singles on the weak side using math. Show a logic that has never been considered before for Roulette. You won't find one. When that math is invented it will be used to prove that you are wrong in all of your assumptions and logic. You always have to be dealt with. Please be intelligent enough to not ask me for that math. I've explained this from the start. You don't read threads. You just start trouble from positions lacking context. This time you look dumber than usual.

 

What do you believe your edge is over the casino?

 

He doesn't have an edge. All he does is bullshit on this site. No doubts he's never been in a casino.

 

i winning over $3,000 from learning gixmotron teaching here.

 

The world is full of idiots like you. That is my greatest strength. I know that you will look right at this with your lying eyes and see nothing. It's perfect. You are so obsessed with your own magical beliefs that you can't see anything but your demented illusion of grandeur.

It's only fitting that you should be trapped by your own self inflicted gaslighting.