Roulette The Best of Roulette: Theory, Mathematics, Betting Systems, Strategies, Software

Let me ask you a question that you answer in all honesty. Is it possible, I mean is it remotely possible that what may not work for one person could work for another? Of course the answer has to be yes. The only way you could answer that otherwise is to know all the exact parameters. What systems are being used, total bankroll, the predetermined amount to win before changing strategies. what betting progression is being used, Martingale, Cancellation, Oscar grind or whatever. What the stop\loss is for each system. If I wanted to sound like a roulette expert in my own mind like everyone else, I would just keep spouting what they all spout, it can't work. Well baby let me tell you, I have made this approach work many times, I am just off to other ideas now. Yea I know, they will not work either because you know all the facts regarding what I am doing before you know all the facts. As usual.

 

Why are you calling me baby exactly, are you a transexual or something of this kind, I've read all your claims and it is easy to spot that you are attempting to beat the wheel with systems that have no edge at all, so you can play them for whatever parameters you want, it will end the same, you will lose over the long run. Explain us how switching losing systems for short term play affect the house edge that is set in stone. Thanks.

 

There you go again. You always make claims based on having no facts whatsoever. What exact systems am I using that you know all about? How do you know they have no edge at all? You are just a parrot repeating what all the losers say. And what are all the claims I have made that you read? Maybe you will answer these questions because you sure as hell didn't answer any of my previous questions. Oh, and the reason I called you baby is because you think like one. No other reason. The only people who will ever come out a winner is people who believe it's possible because they will pursue a way till hell freezes over. The losers are the ones who have taken on the attitude there is no way to win. They don't even try, they just constantly criticize those who do. Like you for instance.

 

I change nothing just play my strategy and progression .long term short term this is bull shit .
Bago do you have unlimited amount of money? If yes you will win long term ,and if you can stay up 24 hrs (impossible )
Then it’s all short term.man these bs conversation have been going on forums long term haha .
I have a bet selection wins mor then it loses .the only thing holding me back I don’t have unlimited bank roll so I try to milk them.

 

My thinking go in kill or be killed.

 

You are a complete newbie who believes applying the martingale short term for 10 minutes everyday will prevent him to face long streaks of the same even chance. I don't care what your systems are, they are all based on past spins, and as you are not talking about biased numbers caused by a wheel with some defects, then your systems are losers, I don't need to test them, the result is known. So you reinvented the Hit and Run strategy and you would like us to believe you invented hot water lol.

There are in life things possible and things that will never be possible, like you having an IQ higher than 100, like you being able to run faster than a train, watching a pink elephant in the savanna etc...
And beating Roulette with systems based on past spins belongs to the same category exposed above.

BYE DAVID GREGORY THE SIMPLETON LOL!.

 

A baloney festival in full swing with all the trimmings .

 

Hey Bago, David Gregory the simpleton here. I have a question I would like you to answer and I am sure everyone else would like to hear your answer also. I have played a total of 229 sessions and am ahead by 557 units. I use a 10.00 base unit so that amounts to a win of 55,700.00. If you were in my shoes at this point, what would you do exactly?

 

Boy, this almost makes the point that a triple digit IQ is too far a reach. You use 10.00 as your base unit and you are up 557 units. When I use forth grade arithmetic I get 5,570. Please explain. I don't see 55,700.00 in all this.

 

You're right, my bad. I accidentally left out the zero when I typed it out. It's 5,570 unit. Even if my math sucks, my units won don't

 

David, if I was in your shoes, I would take an appointment with a psychiatrist ASAP because lying to this point is the sign of a serious mental disorder.

 

Okay Bago, following is one of the strategies I used as a hit and run that is to be played only once to a win of 10 units and never play again. I developed this strategy quite a few months ago. I cannot say for sure if it's original or not. I have not seen in any of my research. Actually I have been testing it to see how well it would hold up over time. I play to a win of 30 units and am ahead by 1,115 units. Check it out to a win of 10 units, then leave it alone. I would suggest that everyone on this forum test it.

Betting the Dozens

The Switcharoo

1. Wait until a hit is made on either the 1st or 3rd dozen.

2. If it hits on the 3rd dozen, place your base bet on both the 2nd and 3rd dozen, or if it hits on the 1st dozen, place your base bet on both the 1st and 2nd dozen.

3. From this point forward a bet will always be placed on the 2nd dozen.

4. If your first bet happens to be on the 1st and 2nd dozen and one of those hits, continue to bet base unit until a loss due to the fact it hit on the 3rd dozen. Triple your bet and place on the 3rd and 2nd dozen.

5. Every loss (not counting the zero) is going to occur on either the 1st or 3rd dozen. It cannot occur on the 2nd dozen because you always have an equal bet on that position.

6. After every loss, triple your bets on both the dozen you lost to and the 2nd dozen.

7. If a zero causes a loss, skip spins until a hit is made in either the 1st or 3rd dozen. Continue to skip if it hits in the 2nd dozen. Once it hits in the 1st or 3rd dozen, continue your Martingale progression on the dozen that last hit and the 2nd dozen.

8. Triple your bets no more than 3 times. Example: 10.00, 30.00, 90.00, 270.00.

9. Play to a win of 10 units only.


The object here is betting the odds that the hits will not continually cause a loss because of jumping from the 1st to the 3rd - the 3rd to the 1st - the 1st to the 3rd – the 3rd to the 1st in that sequence.

 

This is good. You immortalized it with your "zinger" the old "Switcharoo" and you only use it once. Now if you use Reading Randomness skills you would know that sleeping dozens are a very common feature of randomness. You could pick exactly when to use the old "Switcharoo" and reuse it with confidence. You should. I showed you that. You owe me boy.

 

Sounds like a compliment but I am not sure. I developed that strategy months before I joined this forum so I am not understanding why I owe you. Unless it is guiding me to understanding reading randomness then use it with confidence. That I could owe you for.

 

Where is Ion Saliu now? He just posted his links and didn't give a damn about what you have to say. Pure spam.

 

I believe everyone on this forum realizes that when I ask you a honest question, you have never once answered any of them other than with your BS criticism. Not one of your posts in all of this entire forum offers anything positive. One thing I have noticed for sure throughout my entire lifetime, when somebody is a loser and has nothing good to say, they just ridicule the winners. That is you to the max. I receive quite a bit of positive response on this forum and some negative responses also. But most of the negative responses I receive are worth some consideration. Okay everybody, let's wait to hear Bago's much anticipated worthless BS reply to this post.

 

I understand that people may feel strange about David. But consider this: He indeed send me (and a few other members I believe) his strategy free as a gift. He even went to the effort to send me his improved method. He has something and he is not selling it. And has the generocity to share it. You have to respect that.

And I would expect a much more mature behaviour from someone so experienced in roulette forums, like Bago. It's a shame.

Now let's focus to roulette. But I guess this is not the right thread.

 

David,
Respect to you. I am new in this forum but not to Roulette and has lot of experience in programming many systems. You have a winner here with the method that you described. The hit rate that I get with this is amazing, I tested quite a few spins from last night.

And, I joined the Forum just to reply you. I have a suggestion though. Instead of Martingale, we can also try +1 for both dozens on a loss and until that loss is turned to profit we continue using that. It takes more time overall but power of this method is such that getting into profit zone again is breeze.

nevk

 

Rona “Cabrona”:

I’m here for you, fata mea. But I also have a life, unlike the old pharts ruminating here and in all kinds of gambling forums. This favor is also valid for Gizmotron “Cabron”. I can see he applies my gambling strategy of streaks. He calls them “patterns”, although only the streaks are calculated by mathematical formulas. I wrote the software to calculate streaks of any length, probability, and number of trials. Software title: well, Streaks, what else?



I can see all them guys here, from all kinds of gambling forums, including the ultra-idiotic gamblersglen! O tempora! O mores! One of them guys, Bago, even talks about going to psychiatrists. It applies to him first, just by looking at his avatar. Association with images exposes a lot about one’s personality!

Now, this is the thread yours truly started. There are all kinds of opinions expressed here, but ultimately they can be divided in just two categories.

1) The gambling systems are based on recent trends
2) No gambling system works; therefore you must flat-bet-only.

The #2 is always a strong indication of casino-moling. The casino will always win because of the house edge. Progression-betting based on streaks (or them patterns, as Gizmotron “Cabron” chooses to call them and thusly claiming originality!) is the only method to win consistently the gamblers have.

Yes, there are always trends. You may also call the phenomenon bias. There is always bias in random events. You will never — ever — see the numbers appearing equally frequency-wise. The streaks are ruling. You can see the groups of system I put together in that famous Super Roulette Strategy. I am not sure my links will stay alive. There is no way of documenting IF the linking is deactivated. But here is a try:

https://saliu .com/best-roulette-systems.html
“The Super Roulette Strategy, The Best Roulette Systems Ever: Win Loss WL Streaks, Progression Betting.”

BEWARE! Chances are they might kick you out of them casinos! It happened to me and other gamblers who take notes on paper, especially in a notebook. You may take legal action, however. There are no warnings at any casino entrance regarding writing on the premises.

Another good thing about roulette is this. You can win with a group of favorite numbers. It never happens in lottery because of the huge difference in house edge. Believe it or not, the house edge is pretty good in roulette (compared to lotto). Some 47% of all lotto players can be all-time winners by playing favorite roulette numbers.

Chances can be improved seriously by detecting bias and playing biased roulette numbers. How? Just look at the table marquee. Just track the last 30 spins. Select all numbers that hit at least twice or at least once. Select just 4-5-6 numbers and play them over long period of times. Chances are good you selected biased numbers.

Just be aware if they change the wheel. The bias is imminent and the casinos change the roulette wheels more often lately. They hate it because of the extra costs, but they have to protect their revenues.

Again, I hope these links remain active. The analyses are based on data collected from a German Spielbank (casino) and analyze numbers “recommended” by another famous roulette strategy: PowerPlay (it ain’t mine and it just happens that the strategy succeeds overall winning after 8000+ spins).

https://saliu .com/freeware/roulette-marquee.html
“Roulette Marquee Numbers, Wheel Bias Report by Column, Win +, Loss –“

https://download.saliu .com/roulette-systems.html
“Free and Outrageously Priced Roulette Systems from Many Gambling Authors, Developers.”

Best of luck, kokodrilos (royalty-name for big-time gamblers)!

Ion Saliu (royalty name: Parpaluck)
Founder of Roulette Mathematics
Founder of Gambling Science

 

What a load of shit. Now he's trying to co-opt attention and credit to sell his crap. If what I'm giving away is his all along then why pay him. It's here for free. Ever think of that dickhead?