Roulette The Ineptness of Turbo and Others...

This is a warning to all. Stop wasting time looking for a statistical EDGE! There is NONE!

For the last few month I tested so many ideas to see if there would be statistical edge somewhere. For example Turbo's horse race looked promising but after programming everything in excel and testing 1000's of spins the return is always 1:37.

For example I tested the 5 top finishers in a 5 (37) cycle race. After 1000's of spins the hit rate would return to 1:37. Yes sometimes you would have top performers going to 12 or above hits, and yes you would be on them. BUT because you dont KNOW which of the 11's are going to 12 you would have to bet all 11's.

This holds true for all 2's going to 3 and all 3's going to 4 etc etc etc. So sometimes the first 2 getting to 3 and betting all 2's coming out will go over 37 and sometimes they will go under 37. And after 1000's of spins they WILL return to 1:37

Turbo will probably answer that he is not betting all 2's going to 3. But if you bet not all then you randomly have to select a few 2's and this will give you not a better statistical edge either (I tested this)

Turbo spoke about all sort of nonsense for example here's a funny one:

Turbo and I will sit at the roulette table and I say to Turbo, I will bet that if I choose 12 random numbers after the first cycle is over a few of them will not show! Turbos says that can not happen, thats voodoo you will have to wait 1 cycle and pick the 12 numbers that not have shown.

After the first cycle is over a few of the random numbers I have choosen did not show. Turbo's face is green how can this be??? I turn to him and say the 5 numbers that did show up from the numbers I choose, I will pick 5 random numbers and I will bet a few of them will not show in Cycle 2.

And hot dang after cycle 2 is over 2 of my randomly choosen numbers did not show!!! Turbo has passed out on the floor next to me.

Moral of the story is. If you have an idea test it for 1000's of spins and not only that do another test with random patterns or numbers or areas it will NOT GIVE YOU BETTER RESULTS!

Stop wasting time and being a fool, play for fun but dont think you can get a statistical edge!

 

ok, if you say so.

 

So you own a casino and just found out that Reading Randomness works.

Don't play for fun. Play to win.

 

Program it! Test it! You get not better results! If you can not program it, then there are no clear rules = ineptness

 

I already proved to myself that I can program reading randomness in an AI version of a charting program. I have found that it is far more productive to program people. They are here. They are perfecting validation. There are clear rules alright. Don't take orders from control freaks. I don't want to blow my brain cells on something that does not need to jump through hoops for others, especially math oriented skeptics. You learn it and program it. Somebody will you know. It's just a matter of time.

 

You DO not have clear rules...If you would have something why are still living out of a trailer??? Where are you're millions? If you do not have the bankroll yet, take steve's test, there is an easy 100.000 for you...

 

More control freak crap. I'll tell you what to do.

I don't care when this is validated. I could write a specific rule to target singles on the weak side. The software would just hunt that characteristic. It would make unfunded bet selections on every existence of a continuing singles on the weak side configuration discovered until being in a win streak phase. It would bet until it wins the session at 3 net wins in the aggregate. It would end a session if it reaches 7 net losses in the aggregate. It would run millions of sessions to prove and validate the method. It would end Roulette forever. Do you really want that? My Reading Randomness thread is about teaching much more than just singles on the weak side. But you now have an iron clad rule. What are you going to do with it? This was always there. You just didn't see it.

 

Unfunded bet selections.... face palm inserted here. Cut those spins your not PAYING. Paste the ones where you do. Test for 1000's of spins, you lose!

Question Why are you still here why not spend your millions?

 

Gizmotron “Cabron” is a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR of the worst kind.

He claims he invented… what? MTML??? He is the sickest of all SICKOS! It’s hard to believe he can still move his hands and type! He is most likely a ZOMBIE!

Clearly, he is SCHIZOPHRENIC. He can only reside in a mental institution. On one hand, he takes some of my roulette systems based on WL (win/loss) streaks. On the other hand, he fights such systems based on the absurd gambler’s fallacy. And the frail cuckoo even dared to bang heads with me in these forums:

https://www.gamblingforums.com/thre...ting-systems-strategies-software.15752/page-4
“The Best of Roulette: Theory, Mathematics, Betting Systems, Strategies, Software”.

 

Says it all doesnt it...

 

Here is the MTML Browser for proof of concept purposes. It's 11 years old and still way ahead of the internet for features.

 

11 years later you're still scraping pennies...

 

Hi Ka2, what I don't understand is how you having more information than me about dyksexlic have not had to decipher it ... You are giving me all the information about dyksexlic that was deleted and you know what? I no longer need it, I understood perfectly with my effort and work everything dyksexlic does, I only had 2 files about what I was talking about and it was enough, it is a pity that you did not want to give me the information, because soon I will get my software and you will see people make money and you will not have it for not having shared the information with me .... That's life!

 

I did not share, cause you doublecross people so many times this forum is full of it! Yes i know how Dyk played, it had a minimum of 2476 units, you would not know the maximum bankroll, cause the system could go on forever, and it will drain you dry at some point! Why do think we havent heard from him in 8 years, cause he lost!

Same goes for turbo, he is now playing the waiting game (skipping spins) while he said some time ago this was the most stupid way to play! How funny is that!

Go have fun with your software, you yelled so many times you had the hg on this forum, then came back even tried to sell the hg to people, why? Because it did not work! Its pathetic!

 

There is a secret to life that I'm sure that you don't know about. Let's keep it that way, shall we.

This thread is all about how smart you are. One might suggest the possibility of narcissism. You ask for proof. Just wait. You will get your proof. I know that more people are trying this out than are posting that they are learning it. Just because Turbo failed with yet another contraption of his does not mean that I must prove to you that this works. Anyone that has been reading knows that a clear change took place 2.5 years ago, right here on this forum. I knew that the mathBoyz and the skeptics were going to reject this all along. I'm counting on that so that one day they would have to eat a shit sandwich. When people like you contribute to a gambling forum I always wonder why they almost always clad themselves in Spandex and take on a savior complex. What's behind that? Is it hurt? Are they wounded by some traumatic experience? Do they see life from a real perspective? Do they know the value of real success? They are like vomit that sickens the entire world all around them. They must control others so that nobody will ever see that they are wrong and make mistakes.

You just got done saying that you are searching for a working system. It's all right here in the first thread posting. It's that or you are the mathNazi police. That's a very sad need you are displaying. Does it hurt? Is genius pain? Do you feel hidden contempt for everyone that supports you? Can you even admit that you feel this way? Not only are you still searching for a working system but you are also searching for that hidden secret to life. I'm glad for you. You are an asshole and I'm glad that you are suffering in your fake world of confusion. Keep searching. The big bad ass superman is exporting his tarnished envy. Thanks for playing for a while in the real world.

 

Sorry for you that you clearly didn't comprehend what I've posted.
If you had, you'd never had made such a nonsense filled post.

Oh great - another "go make millions" and "Steve the roulette computer guy is my hero" thread.

Cheers, you're not wasting my time no matter how many times you don't understand what I've said.

 

Yes I did comprehend it turbo, i did test it however more than a few spins. If there is no different in choosing at random, there will be no edge. Everything you said makes no differenence if choose random or not. And dont tell me about progressions if there is no edge flatbet then it certainky will not work with a progression

 

Tell me in all honestly turbo: In all the examples you provided and I show there is no difference when betting at random in those examples, you still think playing like that still has an advantage???

 

Here is simply logic - if somebody knows method of play which gave an advantage ( without it no way to be a winner in long period ) always possible to say from which side comes this advantage. Turbo that cant say , so cant formulate some rule.
AP always play acordingly some rule, in most cases that rule is simply data from past so AP collect data and if something similar will be in future he will win, if not he will stop play or will adapt to changes.
All are very clear and logical.
Turbo cant describe his play in such simple way... why?

 

This is absolutely not true!!!!!! KA2, no wonder that you cannot win if you play on this way.