Roulette More ramblings of the Inept for the Misfits

Would any misfits like to reply to this thread in a sensible manner ?

Here is a list of results.
Would you..

A) Call this "random"
B) Wouldn't you be able to win every time with spins like this ?

30
30 win
35
30
29
28
28 win
28 win
28 win
28 win
28 win
0
0 win
36
36 win
15
15 win
15 win
0
0 win
36
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
36 win
0
0 win
36
0
0 win
0 win

I for one wouldn't call this random if I sat down and saw this on the spin history board,
no testing program calls this random,
(14 #36's in a row ???????? Is that even possible ?)
but this is what random produced - I can demonstrate as many times as you'd like.
Surely this isn't random, but if they think it is - I challenge the misfits to call it so.
They say any method or system is the same as just picking random numbers...
But this listing above surely isn't random is it ?
When they stop quoting "you can never win" and start thinking, more people will
beat the casino every single time they sit down to play.

Do they see a pattern here ? Everyone with eyes sees a pattern here, a very easily
exploitable pattern no less - from RANDOM. But they'll say there's no pattern here.
Can't predict the next outcome ? 0 maybe ? 36 ? Your call misfits....
This listing came from random and a system/method predicted the correct numbers...

 

Looks just like the depletion of radiation to me. Go for it.

 

Ill answer this honestly 14 repeats yes random produces this. Now you answer this honestly how many times will this happen in 5 spin cycles? Every 5 spin cycle? Or just a few times every 1000 5 spin cycle?

You only show extremes you never ever show the averages. These extremes will still not offset 1:37

 

Before this session appears, you will be - 1 trillion $ playing numbers as they show lol.

 

I bet bago still thinks you would be down 1 trillion... Even though this happens all the time

 

A single number showing 14 times in a row does not "happen all the time", it's clearly impossible Mr Monopoly idiot.

 

Happens often enough for me @Bago and better than the payout to boot!

 

I believe it is..... Just because you didn't see it doesn't mean it doesn't happen "all the time"....

 

Hey @Bitrock06 , can you tell me why you decided not to talk to me anymore?

 

You are both clowns and noobs talking without knowing anything.

 

@Gigi666 because I work, wife is now pregnant, life is busy? Is that ok?

 

All it would take would be a line like that in an email its not too much is it, just a common courtesy, as before you were quite responsive, so thought you just decided to ignore me.

 

Yeah whatever bago.... It seems you know it all....

Oh I just saw your picture.... Simulator, eh? LoL.... Oh well....

 

Law Of the Thirds is a dynamic process in which results are being updated with each and every spin, events get apart or even collide as they are coming closer.
If this was a static, fixed phenomena then we would witness 1 repeat per 3 spins/numbers (3.14)

 

The law of the third proves that there's one or two tooo many numbers on the wheel in order win.

 

Sir Dr AA



The law of the third is a bamboozle without any merits.

 

More numbers to bet more profit to gain, HE is something but has it ever occurred to you that there are greater forces at play?