Roulette Undeniable proof for the "repeaters"

I got a good chuckle out of that one! It's maths Jim, but not as we know it!

 

Not need to wait you are wrong too many times even in this post :

But if you will bet 4 streets you will have a 100% chance to win .
I think that it is clear for everybody that this 100% not give any profit?

Here you are also not right - after these two spins when hit your dozen you are still not in 50/50 situation. In such a situation, calculations must be done in another way -
Probability not hit = 0.75*0.5= 0.375
Probability to hit =1-Probability not hit= 1-0.375=0.625

But anyway all that have no relationship with winnings or losings, because one moment - you all say about the case when dozen will appear.
That is the same as to say that I had 3500% edge when betted one number and it hit

You must calculate all probability in front not backward when something happened!

 

So I landed in the emergency room on Monday about 2;30 am and couldn't breath. They just let me go two hours ago and fixed something else that they discovered also. So it was a bonus for me, so far. Anyway I see many are triggered now by this proof of concept thread. So I'll give a very simple question and see if anyone understands this method's bet selection rules yet.

22 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )
3 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )
34 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )
1 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )
12 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )
15 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )
27 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )
23 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )
36 hit. ( how much & where do you bet next? )

Now anyone with the knowledge by now on what to bet next, where, and how much should be able to fill in this simple question. That is the only way I will be able to understand the communication regarding my question. You can call me a troll, retard, ignorant fool for all I care. Turbo started this. He has clearly stated that if you don't understand it by now you must be a troll. If he answers this question so that I can understand it then he will have succeeded in communicating his method. If he refuses then he is the one that is the same as his own accusations. I've got to go to sleep some more now. Merry Christmas to All.

 

P.S. I get that betting the max on each number because you know what is coming next is fun for conversation. But that's not the answer, is it.

 

Actually yes - but that's not what's happening here.
If you play all 4 streets, then when that dozen appears you will win 100% of the time.
So correct but has nothing to do with this, if you looked at the data.
Now since I'm playing 2 streets only (max) - then I can expect to win 50% of the time - surely
you agree with this.
But no - it's well beyond 50% isn't it ? I showed it - you can do the same.
Statistically I should win around 50/50 - due to repeaters this doesn't happen, I'm showing 63%
What is the house edge ? 5.26% ? Aren't we well beyond the required to win ? Yes.

I never showed that - I showed the results.
I can do it for the future if you'd like it that way.
I will win 63% of the time betting 50% of the field. There, a nice prediction.

Behold - 63% win rate.

 

This is a WWW.

I'm not sure why you are saying "how much" to bet ? This is not a system, it's data showing the player's
win rate far well above 50% as it SHOULD be given we are betting 50% of the available numbers.
I'll do a video demonstration of your posted spins and then maybe it will be clear for you.
You'll have to give me a few to make the video and post it -
I do hope you are recovering and it's nothing serious. We are a community, regardless
of who we get along with.

 

Mark ,



Wishing you a speedy recovery .




ND

 

But you never show that in future - you always post chart what was in the past - that show nothing. Say you bet on repeaters - so bet what just fall - we can very easy to compare what will fall more often - what fell or not what fell.
You can win only if what fell in the past will fall in the future more often, but I can show on tons of data that with such betting you will not win.

 

It's looking real good so far. Thanks.

 

Your videos are even too fast to pause to figure out what they mean. Did you ever see the movie "The King's Speech?" He starts saying "FUCK FUCK FUCK" between his phrases. Well your WWW means about that much to me. This is the official last time I will won't ask you any more questions because you won't answer, ever. FUCK FUCK FUCK.

I'm no troll. I hope when you get to the Pearly Gates and St Peter asks you the big question you give the same sort of answer to him. It will go something like this: "Why should I let you in here?" says Peter. And you will say something like "I have already given you your answer and a full explanation. St Peter will then say "FUCK NO, FUCK NO, FUCK NO, get the heck out of here and go to the other place.?

You are done.

 

Good, then you'll stop wasting my fucking time.
You might be the worst troll and thickest brained person I ever talked to.
But it's all part of the game, I get it.

Giving away info for free goes against the whole "student" and "school" bit you have going.

 

This sure is one batshit crazy thread!

 

Don't look a gift horse into the mouth . That`s what Turbo implies .

 

Not trying to be funny because people can learn in different ways but in this case, why is this any more relevant than saying that there are 12/13 sleepers at the end off a 37/38 cycle spin. Those 12/13 numbers won't comprise of 4 unique streets anytime soon. The one takeaway point I got from this thread is that you would be nuts to bet streets if you believed in LOTT etc.. compared to straight up numbers.

 

I can show all in slight more simply way:

So are not numbers , but numbers of streets

 

True! Information is good wherever or whoever it comes from to sort out what's what.

 

Accordingly, these rules I can do some simple excel program and run several thousand consequential spins and show results. Need that for somebody?

 

Well, this troll holds PhD in statistics. My day job involves dealing with randomness. These are the basics.

Roulette is something I do for the sake of relaxation...

Well, yes - if in the first spin you play 12 numbers, and in the second you play 24 - the chance of winning is not 2/3... When you talk about multi-spin odds - you deal with continuous probability. If you win on the second spin - you win 12 units... But if you lose BOTH spins - you lose 36 spins - and not 24 units (the number you would win if you won the first spin, which would make 50% - 50% chance)

If your math is correct, then this would be a holy grail without a need to build a "system" around it, as you would already have the edge over the expected 1/12 probability of street hitting.

To understand the math, play just one dozen and you'll get it.


Marry Christmas

 

Ok for me now absolutely clear how all works, still not made program but done some tests manually looks this way:
WLL
LWW
WLW
LWW
WLL
WLL
And a chart of bankroll :