Roulette Undeniable proof for the "repeaters"

You are so far gone that you should wrap yourself in a straight jacket as soon as you can and save yourself even more money.

 

Or to paraphrase EVITA Peron : " I give you illusions but no solutions " .

 

You know damn well you can't put yourself in a straight jacket lol.
But that would be a challenge to make happen, I'll take your suggestion into consideration.

 

Ok, now I see you really don't know where is the logical math flaw in this concept you proposed here.

So, let's use the comparation you proposed - first spin you play dozen 1, then if it doesn't hit you play both dozen 1 and dozen 2.

You obviously don't play "all 36 numbers" as you said... But do you understand that probability of wining isn't 2/3, but much higher as you already played 12 numbers in the first spin?

You count win (W in your examples) if either first or second spin win... So, you can't celebrate having win rate higher than 2/3 as the expected wasn't 2/3, but much higher because of the first spin.

...

In particular case with 2 streets in one dozen, expected hit rate is (total prob + prob in the last spin) / 2 = (75% + 50%) / 2 = 62.5%... exactly what you were showing us...

 

Any more update on straight jacket wear ? ROFLMAO.

 

Turbo,

Even if you play on two dozen numbers, the probability of winning is only 24/38. Notice the denominator is 38, as in 38 pockets on the wheel. In order for you to just break even in the long run, that 38 needs to be a 36. Understand? You're still coming up short on the payout each time you win. Again, there are just two toooo many numbers on the wheel.

 

And i think we save a one man show ticket and tomatoes...

 

Sharp,

By any chance rotten tomatoes ?

 

Sooooooooooooooooo
Playing 50/50 of the possible outcomes, we win at 62.5% and not 50%.
Can I stop clapping, my hands hurt lol.

 

Oh!!! The Emperor's New Fans routine. Now that's a classic!!!

"Don't worry. You guys can't see them, but they definitely exist. Contacting me privately every day, thanking me for showing them how to beat the game. They're all I need."

Because eventually, all of your threads will look like this one. You won't be able to run your scam on newbies without being outed by other members.

But don't worry, as we speak your brain is already making an escape plan to leave the forum. Remember, you're the victim, and everyone else is just out to get you. 35 years and nothing to show for it; that's tough. I'm surprised you haven't created your own forum by now.

 

Sheesh.

For someone who thinks they have it all figured out, you're not even close lol.
Don't give up though, you can be "leader of the trolls" which means nothing, but hey it's
something when you contribute nothing lol.
Maybe you'll be remembered someday for your nothingness you add to the forum.

 

Yes ! I understand.
It's almost like I can play 50% of the available bets and win 62.5% of the time - now your pocket count has been defeated. Go figure it was that easy.

 

If I wasn't close, you wouldn't have mentioned it.

Don't worry Turbo, everyone else can already see through your act, I just said it out loud.

 

I tested many, but mostly chart show minus. That is because simply win gave less profit ...really after 11 sessions were at all 17 wins and 16 losses...

Here is common what I see. Ewen situation in a cycle with one loss and two wins often gave minus.
Then simply changed rules how to bet - bets algorithm become more similar to automatical finding bias - play becomes about for zero :

Up - down , but without super tendency to go down....

 

Now if you can get Nathan and the other misfits to give your trolling posts 400 more likes, you still won't be
1/2 as relevant to the forum as I am lol.
It's cool though - do it your way, make noise and troll - at some point someone other than the misfits will care what you have to say (but not yet).

 

Turbo,


Why don't you just bet on every number instead? That way you can brag that you win 100% of the time!

 

The WHEEL rules simple as that .

 

LoL..After thinking through most ideas, the following normally applies.

 

Oh god...

Now either you're trolling, or you can't figure out simple math...

First spin - you play 1 street.
Second spin - you play 2 streets.

1 unit in the first spin + 2 units in the second spin = 3 units placed.
In total - you placed 3 units through which you covered 9 numbers. Just because you tried your luck twice on same 3 numbers doesn't mean they don't count in total units placed — it's the same as if you chose other 2 streets — you still placed 9 units on the table.

If you win on the second spin - you win 2 units on that dozen.
If you lose both spins you lose 3 units on that dozen.

If it were 50% - 50% chance -> you would win or lose 6 units.

Damn Turbo...

 

Damn, I was shocked and I made 2 typos.

"you still placed 3 UNITS on the table"
"you would win or lose 2 UNITS"