Roulette Beating Random by Betting Random

You can look to see as much as you want to see, or as little. There are 18 red numbers made up of 18 unique numbers from the inside layout. I don't see a reason for those slots on the wheel being any better than other slots as long as there are 18 of them in that unique set. You have your pet 18, the opposing 18 in the opposing set of that grouping and then the two greens. You can even make up sets that include the one or two greens in that 18. You can chose to leave out any other two that would then act as a different two green numbers.

So if you bet on 18 unique numbers you are placing an "Even Chance" bet, just like as if you placed 18 chips on the Red or the Black. This explains why I have 12 sets that make up 6 groupings. Three groups are from the outside bets and three groups are made from the inside bets. But they are all EC bets. Here is what I know. The reds could be crashing and losing while the high 18 are in a win streak. But if you only watch the reds you would have missed that. So why is it so good to miss things that are working?

 

You only need red /black for most people they do not want to pay attention to 12 sets of even money .playing your way might be good at home computer but in a live casino forget about it.

 

What is this? I'm not most people and don't want to be. I want to find the winning set. If I have 12 sets then I have a better chance of finding one working than I do if I'm only looking at 2 sets. It's OK with me though. You can corner the market on 2 sets.

I have played thousands of hours hunting things that are in states of continuing. I don't care if people want to live on hamburgers & fries when I know they can live on steak and all the trimmings. Your advocating for minimalism is interesting, but this is not music where "less is more." I have the trained skill to find the active sets. Why would I go back to wearing blinders so that I can be like "most people?" This leads to the real question here. Why do you recommend only one grouping with its two sets?

 

It’s a fact that people can only retain up to 7 numbers this is why when you break things up in groups of 3 or 4 it’s easier to remember .there are only 4 patterns .
RB
RR
BB
BR
Now casinos alow you to bet Marty up to 9 spins that’s min 1 max500 those are the rules within the matrix of the casinos what you do with this is up to you .you can create 100 sets of what ever or stick to what the rule set is and try to win.

 

I don't think so. Do you know what singles on the weak side means and what it looks like? Once you know this you will have a fifth pattern for your menagerie of quotable maxims.

Oh Yeah, thanks for keeping the lights on and for supporting gambling.

 

Don’t no what you mean by supporting gambling.

 

Just keep using that Martingale and perhaps one day you will get my point.

 

Yes very aware of what your trying to teach might work for you but like I said it’s a fact that there 7 numbers that people can memorize on a telephone ,when they go to casino environment what your teaching won’t work .

 

There is no point and I’m not getting into a debate with you about what your doing .for me it doesn’t work

 

I'm glad you are not in charge of the space program.

 

Therefore ......... DO NOT teach gambling especially NOT on forums .

 

Red and black kiss all the way

 

And leave your ego at the door .

 

there is no money management that can survive even money bets you either win on unit at a time or you lose slower there is nothing other then Marty all money management schemes fail if you have enough bank roll and no table limits roulette is beatable and I’m becoming a millionaire .anyone can make 3 units that’s a mosquito fart in the big scheam of things .
I can do this with my first 3 bets blind folded .

 

I agree with a lot you have to say, however, to make the statement: "if you have enough bankroll and no table limits, roulette is beatable." The flaw in that statement is: "beatable with no table limits." What roulette table in this universe has no table limits?

 

The Marquis de Rothschild a banker had told the founder and owner of the Monte Car;o Casino if you remove your limits I shall own your casino .



Nuff said ..

 

This is the point I was trying to make to players you have to work with what rule set the casinos give you .theres a min .And a max.bet. So therefore your bet selection has to work within those rules to have 12 sets of something means nothing if you can’t aplly in a real casino doing it a computer and observing graphs does not carry over to a real casino setting it’s noisy for one and to many distractions.and online play is not my thing .to many casinos cheat players .

 

a Martingale is good for 9 spins that’s it bet selection has to work consistently within those spins most players chicken out when it gets to 7 therefore losing .
Flat bet does not work .unless you have friends that would like to take ove a 8 hr shift lol.

 

Now if you want to extend the Marty to let’s 1111248163264128 that’s fine you’ll be down 2 units on a win but it take time .most players have no patience so to teach single and double and waiting for somthing to happen doesn’t work.

 

After the banker told the owner of Monte Carlo that, the owner's response was probably: No, we won't remove the limits, and that's why we will own you.