1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Lies MathBoyz, Therapists, and Casinos Want You to Believe

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by gizmotron, Jan 14, 2020.

  1. Rustyshackleford

    Rustyshackleford Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2019
    Likes:
    37
    Location:
    nyc
    i been keeping Gizmotron forecasting the uncharted future in the back of my mind for months now, just because he says it works doesn't make it true and just because people like Bago/Sharp/sir sir say it doesn't work doesn't make it true either, i personally do not know however if you told me about a Bob Dancer winning money hand over fist and not have to actually have a boss breath down his neck 10 years ago id call you crazy or yea right,or i could never do that, if i was alive during when Ken uston won millions and his IQ said to be 169 beating blackjack probably same reaction the point is Gizmo has the ability to harness the power of gambling in roulette if its a opinion or fact remains to be pixels on a gate way otherwise known as the internet, id like to keep an open mind how long have you been doing this Giz? over a month 8 hour days would be a solid sample size IMO im sure people like Sharp/sir sir would want a cool mil spins. 64+ pages is alot on a gambling forum some would say you are blowing smoke whiles would say we truly dont know but id like to know more

    i always viewed the houses edge much like a chess match, you are black at a disadvantage moving 2nd and the casino is white moving first, but after that where things even out with our modern powerful computers we still can't find the one and only move that dominates any end game even tho there is a limited number of moving pieces on the board my point is its much like gambling with the players ability to change the flow any given time and the math of the game is thrown off the tracks
     
  2. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    The house edge only bites a player when he replays the winnings and exceeds the loss limit he should have st.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2020
  3. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    I just hope once Gizmouton and turbo make a featuring... The apotheosis from two math rebels
     
  4. Kairomancer

    Kairomancer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2019
    Likes:
    53
    Location:
    NA
    Well, Steve finally did it. The house edge is real, and all the players collective results considered they lose because of it.
     
  5. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    That's not proof of what a casino would take in. At best it's proof of using math to beat a 3% to 5% disadvantage and what it would result in. The casinos already report a 14% to 20% annual take. All your stats show is that the simulation is mathematically oriented. We don't live in a mathematical world. The IRS and bookkeeping audits are in the real world. Conformation bias and junk science are not good research partners. Living by them is just self imposed flagellation.
     
  6. Kairomancer

    Kairomancer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2019
    Likes:
    53
    Location:
    NA
    Steve's multiplayer is a single zero roulette simulator. Indeed it is not a real casino, but it is as close as an online casino can get, except the initial bankroll is only virtual and the winnings cannot be transfered to real money.
    Yet the combined stats of all the results of the players are very close to the theoritical house advantage.

    How would you explain that?
     
  7. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I don't have to. I'll put it this way to see if you can get it this time. I can lose all the bets that I'm expected to lose, based on math, and still beat the casino. I don't get charged for virtual guesses, (bet selections). There is such a thing as a win streak and it is possible to exploit that condition. There is such a thing as a losing segment of a session and it is possible to not fund that condition. How would you explain that?
     

  8. Kairomancer

    Kairomancer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2019
    Likes:
    53
    Location:
    NA
    I read a report recently that the total payout was 96% in the only government licensed online casino in our central european country.
     
  9. Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone

    Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone Well-Known Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Likes:
    931
    Occupation:
    Shoe Cobbler
    Location:
    Merica
    Do you just make this stuff up while tripping on mushrooms or are you copying from a book?
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2020
  10. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    1,794
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    Did you happen to notice the pusher of precognition nonsense on the other forum bragging about
    being in first place at RS with 2 million in profit ?
    Nowhere though does he mention that $1,159,000.00 MILLION dollar drawdown
    Or the fact that if this amazing power works - why "doesn't" it work ?
    lol.png

    Idiots like this are the scourge of gambling forums.
    They are so full of BS but rarely get called out on it.
    Not to mention 49 prior bankroll resets in order to get to this one lucky run, which is now somehow
    proof of mumbo-jumbo precognition powers !!
    lol

    It'll never change.
     
    Naughty but nice likes this.
  11. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I saw it. He's a legend in his own mind. It's funny too. He's an advocate for ESP. He want's it so bad.

    You and I put our stuff out there. People can take it or leave it.

    People come from different stages of their gambling experience. The only thing that has made a huge impact of validation in the gambling world is counting cards, defective biased wheels that have all been fixed or adequately obfuscated by exchanging parts on a daily basis, or the complete absence that precognition works. Where's the proof?

    They demanded that I prove Reading Randomness works. I don't care. I put it out there, tried to make it clear what it is, and left it to people to teach themselves. They can prove it to themselves, in the end, that is the only one that would ever convince them.

    I actually love what I did for them. Three times I did 50 won sessions in a row and then self destructed using a marti progression. It has them twisted like a pretzel. I used their so called proof as a red herring. The only thing that convinces is finding out for yourself if it works for you. They don't like that answer.
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2020
  12. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    In reference to the EC variety most players are chasing either B or R as their single choice .
     
  13. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    1,794
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    untitled.png

    This just happened, wow.
    Precognition is FOR REAL ! - who knew. I bet casinos everywhere are shaking in their boots hoping this person never steps foot on the casino floor.

    Wait, I'm getting a vision..... it's strong.... it says to bet on #20.............
    Dammit.
     
    mr j, gizmotron and Nathan Detroit like this.
  14. Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone

    Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone Well-Known Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Likes:
    931
    Occupation:
    Shoe Cobbler
    Location:
    Merica

    34f6d9988f3fbea147ce41b88075ad6a.jpg
     
    Nathan Detroit likes this.

  15. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    What name does he play with? I went looking for him, crickets.
     
    TurboGenius likes this.
  16. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    1,794
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    Mysteriously vanished from the leaderboard - maybe we need voodoo magic to find the games now.
     
  17. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    There are many more options for discussions on the roulette forum.One EC forum with only 2 options is going around in circles with the same

    rehashed garbage every day.


    Not to forget those undisciplined wannabe winners and definite losers.


    Back to reality.


    ND
     
  18. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    That certain forum is now on my Ignore list (no postings there). Less traffic helps a topic to whither on the vine .
     
    mr j likes this.

Share This Page