1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Discussion in 'TurboGenius's Forum' started by TurboGenius, Mar 27, 2020.

  1. Smitridel

    Smitridel Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2019
    Likes:
    134
    Location:
    Greece
    Thank you for stating the same thing that I already pointed.
    Since you dont have anything more to contrbute or answer my specific question I'd prefer an answer from the man himself.
     
  2. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    Sorry, it is because it is obvious to me that noone on earth can predict if a past hot number will continue to be hot in the future or go cold. But you can still ask your newspaper seller if he has tomorrow's newspaper so that you can know the megamillions winning numbers in advance. :D
     
  3. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    1,794
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    I mean.... "ok" ?
    Here, I'll run off some fresh spins...

    1x.....33
    2x.....33
    3x.....19
    4x.....33
    5x.....25
    6x.....19
    7x.....19
    8x.....25
    9x.....25
    10x....25
    11x....25
    12x....25
    13x....25
    14x....25
    15x....25
    16x....25
    17x....25
    18x....25
    19x....25
    20x....25 *spin 437

    So #25 isn't predictable ? 14 times out of 20 isn't predictable ?
    (437/20)=21.85 So appearing 1 in 21.85 and NOT 1 in 37 and better yet 1 in 35 isn't predictable ?
    This doesn't happen over and over with every test you run ?

    Then there's nothing anyone can do - even the obvious isn't obvious enough I suppose.
    But I tried lol.
     
    TwoUp, Fossell and mr j like this.
  4. mr j

    mr j Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Likes:
    1,809
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WIS
    I must of gone through 20-30 versions of HOW to play hot (above average) numbers. I'm finally at a nice resting spot. I have no interest trying beyond this stage of play.

    Your way (our way), quite similar.

    Ken
     
    Fossell and TurboGenius like this.
  5. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    Again, you need a time machine that travels in the past to bet n°25 from spin 1 to get your 1/21.85 hit rate buddy.
     
    Bozidar likes this.
  6. Bozidar

    Bozidar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Likes:
    16
    Location:
    Serbia
    1. You cherry picked a session where only 3 numbers appear in a session. There is often way more numbers, real session:
    1x.....10
    2x.....14
    3x.....0
    4x.....10
    5x.....7
    6x.....5
    7x.....18
    8x.....20
    9x.....7
    10x.....7
    11x.....7
    12x.....34
    13x.....34
    14x.....7
    15x.....20
    16x.....20
    and 20 continues...

    2. You get your "1 in 21.85" based on first few fast hits going from 1x to 2x, from 2x to 3x, from 3x to 4x... where numbers appear fast, but change a lot - you're not measuring spins between wins - which is a quite stupid way of manipulation stats and presenting it as something which isn't. If "1 in 21.85" is true - why it's "not enough" to flat bet on a new number? Because first hit would be on number going from 9x - 10x (in the session above) - and it took way more than 21 spins :)

    3. Even with your 3-column sheet - problem is the same - you count average of numbers changing all the time - and when they become steady - it's way way more than 1 in 24.
     
    Ka2, Rulet and Bago like this.
  7. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    1,794
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    You can't force people to understand things sometimes, not even when they are this obvious lol.
    Keep winning.
     

  8. Fossell

    Fossell Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Likes:
    152
    Location:
    UK
    I know I don't post much due to time in general. But glad to see you're still alive Ken! :) Long time no see!
    Oh and I completely agree.
     
    mr j likes this.
  9. mr j

    mr j Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Likes:
    1,809
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WIS
    It goes back years ago when I had my threads....."Can thinking outside the box be taught"?

    Then and now, I still say it canNOT be taught (imo). You either have it (see it) or you dont.

    Ken
     
    Rond1nell1 likes this.
  10. Smitridel

    Smitridel Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2019
    Likes:
    134
    Location:
    Greece

    I wonder why hasnt someone else commented on the above - instead everyone else is again on the "I know it you dont and cheating on the simulator".

    This variance is what bothers me.
    And the key is in progression. And more specifically what kind of progression would combat this type of variance effectively?
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2020
    Gandhi and BlueAngel like this.
  11. SERGIO

    SERGIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    74
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
  12. SERGIO

    SERGIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    74
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
  13. SERGIO

    SERGIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    74
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
    ...
     

    Attached Files:

  14. SERGIO

    SERGIO Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    74
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
    • Violation of Rule #5: No Affiliate Links
    [removed]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 10, 2020

  15. chewtoy

    chewtoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2020
    Likes:
    18
    Location:
    Paris
    Hi TurboGenius, I like your approach on roulette and I learned a lot reading your posts. So thank you it's really great what you are doing. Using the repeaters I actually mix it with the sleepers technique. I play a positive progression, +1u after a number win, and I play for around 72 spins after the checking trends for 37to72 spins. For the repeaters I usually have 4 selected, so more than the 3 and I do play them from the start and each spins (unlike for the sleepers where I do wait till they appear).
    You did say that you wouldn't play the top repeaters every spins and there wouldn't be the only bets you make. So I would love to have more hints. Playing sleepers to have more numbers to bet on balance variance, is it the right way to go ? If not how many numbers would you play and how would you select them and start to bet on them ?
    thanks !!
     
  16. chewtoy

    chewtoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2020
    Likes:
    18
    Location:
    Paris
    Hi Think I found following the rhythm of the numbers
     
  17. chewtoy

    chewtoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2020
    Likes:
    18
    Location:
    Paris
    actually not sure if you have any tips it would be welcome
     
  18. Rulet

    Rulet Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2019
    Likes:
    64
    Location:
    England
    Turbogenius,
    You know it doesn’t work all the time, I agree with Bozidar. You’re avoiding his question. When the distribution is equal and you do get those sessions, you can kiss your bankroll goodbye. Not even positive progression can bail you out
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2020
  19. eugene

    eugene Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2016
    Likes:
    415
    Location:
    united kingdom
    ScreenHunter 04.png

    I thought it was interesting that having replicated Turbo's chart, my results were pretty much identical. I highlighted also how the 36 came from nowhere to become very hot. It's a nice piece of analysis to get the old grey matter working.

    cheers Turbo!
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2020
  20. Rulet

    Rulet Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2019
    Likes:
    64
    Location:
    England
    That’s only 1 session, session from hell is just round the corner. I said it doesn’t work all the time, read my posts carefully, could that be the problem?
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2020

Share This Page