TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

I think the best thing anyone can do playing roulette is to keep a chart of all numbers and the frequency of each number.
I have to give Turbo credit for that

 

having a chart of frequency of all numbers that got a hit is nothing new Rulet, but yes I think it is a good start. but what else did you deduct from what he wrote at the begining of this 3rd thread ? did anything else jumped out ?

 

Nothing new imo, I play upto 12 numbers in difficult sessions.
Biggest problem, is the progression, it doesn’t win flatbet, unless of course a couple of numbers go off the chart crazy.

 

try this:

Wait until you get to spin 20 with max 3 repeats or spin 25 with max 4 repeats. That should be the trigger.
After the trigger shows up, wait for another repeat to appear than bet all the numbers that showed up until then. Practically, after we have the trigger, we bet for 2 consecutive repeats to show up.
For me, it works flatbet. In case we have 3 consecutive bets without a win, restart session and wait for another trigger!

 

What did you get ?

 

I see the frequency of "matching the numbers" and how they return. you can replicate the chart and see how consistent that is.
R.

 

i just read this yesterday and i saw that too. If that happens everytime.... then i'll need to think how to expoid that. I might do some testing soon. Very soon

 

Ayk’s tracker would work well to calculate the spin gap for a potential returning number.

 

I’ve done 1 test based on Turbos top 3 number recording, it worked but it was one of those sessions where you had 3 top performing numbers and they dominated the top 3 spots . One number in particular didn’t lose the top spot for upto 12 laps and other 2 followed it into second and third spot regularly.
Those sessions are easy to win and doesn’t represent the norm, the numbers change a lot more at other times.

 

The problem is you don’t know which numbers are going to continue to hit and sometimes end up with 12 numbers, the frequency could be skewed, doesn’t always follow a consistent pattern.
Even playing the top performing 12 numbers could be a struggle at times, was it not for the progression.

 

Does it happen enough to profit from it ?

 

Not always,
Have a look at the test I have done this morning, it worked this time.
What the test doesn’t show is the numbers I played in addition to what was on the list, sometimes upto 10 numbers!
Little numbers on the top left are spin number
And Turbo numbers do change later on too not just at the beginning

 

Some numbers performed just as well but never got on the list? My intuition was my saviour.
I am sure Turbs will find a convenient explanation for that

 

Something else which happens frequently is the following...



That number in third spot changes to the first spot within a few spins.

Number 11 changes from third spot to first spot between spin 54 and 55.
Number 2 changes from third spot to first spot between spin 162 and 165.
Number 28 changes from third spot to first spot between spin 234 and 236.

Look at each chip as a bullet and not to waste them. If you are betting too many numbers for too many spins, you are going to come across some periods where negative variance will damage you. So really the trick is to try and get as much bang for your buck as possible. The above is one of the ways of achieving that.

 

But we dont need to be right on all those numbers imo. Just 1 or a few is enough to win. And if i look at your paper test....i could easily win there too.... ( i still fine tuning all this info from TG...but i might be on the right track. Just try figuring out the right positive progression to use ) ... so it looks like I got work to do

 

Those 1st , 2nd and 3rd seem to switch a lot. But....at least 1 of them showing up......isn't that enough to build up on ?

 

I think this is the thing Turbo tries to get across and like you said yourself Denzie, you don't need to be on every number but when there is a smaller pool of numbers to pick from and they are coming up regularly, you should do ok for the most part even just flat betting.

 

Doesn’t happen all the time, this was a fortune session, distribution can be a lot more irregular than this example

 

It's why I said the other day that anyone looking into all this could do a lot worse than really look into Turbo, Gizmo and Mr J's work because you have a really good blueprint for winning.

Turbo pretty much provides the framework. Ken is right with his 2-4 numbers because otherwise variance can eat away all your profits and Gizmo is spot on that you need to read what's happening as the game is evolving.

It's all there. Now no two people are probably going to do everything exactly alike but sticking to it for the most part and I really don't see how you could go too far wrong.

 

“I really don’t see how you could go far wrong “

Do be careful of the variance fairy. She can trick players into thinking they have something that hasn't been discovered by any other clever people in over 200 years, but then alters her ways, bends them over the gaming tables and, whilst wearing a huge strapon, does things to them that makes their eyes water and leaves them in tears. She's can be a real b*tch.

Best of luck mate. I've a feeling you'll need it.