TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Early in the game.

 

So, this game is playing as known from data

 

87 spins like your game above. Nothing is racing out. So, the action is the repeats are happening with 1x's and R1's

 

I bet all of them then reset at a certain point, trying to catch that maniac horse who’s going to come from behind.
Watch your behind!

 

Look 96 spins; 6 non-hits left and whats happened for the last 4 spins. So, is R-sim a load of Boll-cks

 

Look at #22 came out of nowhere and overtook #27 within 20 spins!

 

Here’s the chart, reset at 65 should have done it at 60 really but had a feeling that I was going to hit again, but quickly changed my mind

 

BR was good

 

NBN
Not playing 2-3 numbers.
Positive progression is a fuc.ing No No

 

But not where the big doggs play

 

I've been using this method for 1 year now.
I've tested (and stresstested) every variation that I could come up with progression-wise.

The most effective as far as Im concerned is the positive one with martingale steps.
But you need a huge Bankroll to get though variance (especially when you're "up-ing as you win" and the hits dont come.
The strength of this method comes from back to back hits or hits close enough (2 or 3 gaps) as soon as you up your unit size (up as you win).

However I really cant get around the single weakness of the whole idea: What happens when you have equal distribution and the hot 3 are in a slowed down frequency?
For example lets say you start betting at 3x.

First 3x number is 6.
You bet 6 for ten spins and the second 3x number is 12.
You bet 6,12 for five spins and the third 3x is 36.
You bet 6,12,36 and ten spins later the next 3x number is 8.
(But you stay on 6,12,36 since you are always betting on the first top 3.)
Twenty spins later and after more numbers have become 3x's number 8 becomes the first 4x but you werent betting on it.
This is a common situation with relative equal distribution and bad luck/accuracy.

So now you bet on number 8 and you discard the rest but do you up your progression on it or do you leave at 1 unit (since you werent betting on it)?
What would you guys do in that scenario?

 

I would stay on the same units. Only up on a hit. I've been doing something simular with GREAT results. But....I use a fixed BR. And i win lot more sessions than i lose. Put a good MM to it imo

 

Have you tried just following the 1's. Find a prog; that you use or like.
Bet #22; The #12 is in the 1 column; so you now bet these 2 numbers.
#24 joins the 1's; so you now have 3 to bet. The #24 hits, so re-bet all column 1 #'s. The #24 hits again. Again just bet all 1's.
The #31 joins those in column 1; so, you bet all column 1;just 4#'s.
Now #18 joins column 1; so you have 5#'s to bet. But do you see before the #18 joins, #24 hit.
The#18 joined and the next in column 1 is not a new number but #24.
You can see also #18 hit again.
Then the 5#'s you'd be betting are hitting.
Now it's down to gaps between wins, would a prog make profit?

 

#14

 

ROFL

 

By fixed BR you mean use a stop loss?
Session management is suitable, I agree.
I will test it but the drawdown is drowing the BR unless you are playing it safe waiting for the specific occasion of b2b hits or small gap hits which would also seem like a smart idea.

 

Smart but imo it doesnt really matter which number as the top 3 usually alternate so youre actually playing almost all the 1s but at different times.