Baccarat Cracked it! Baccarat can be beaten

Been working on this for a while and checked many continuous outcomes. Had my data scientist analyse 154,000+ outcomes roughly 2,500 shoes, for another system I'm working on regarding patterns. During the course of looking at the results, something occurred to me, gave me an idea, so putting my patterns system aside I started upon my idea and I was amazed, easy to follow system, can't say too much right now, but all rules have been formed. The outcome so far of checking is as follows,

assuming I play the double down, in each group following a trigger, thus win 1 or loss 3, results thus far, WWW L WW L W L WWWWWWWW L WWWWWWWW L L WW L WW L WWWWWW L L WWWW L L WW L WWWWW
no more than 2 losses in a row, so far of having checked a run of 180 outcomes, with double downs losses = 13x3 = -39 / wins = 43, thus at that point 4+ units up but as you can see would have been up 10+ very stable play. Also as you can see above there were three times were a L followed a L so if you skipped a game following a loss until a virtual win, although would lose out on that 1+ win x13 would save 9 so not worth skipping in my view given the would be up 4 over the losses.

Could add instead of double down of course 2nd bet would be a double and half the win, win on a double down, but when losing, the risk is minimised, 1/2/3/4/5/6 etc when winning on the 3rd that's breakeven, good outcome considering was fighting losing groups two in a row. / 4th only 2- down, when winning on the 5th only 5 down, but 5th bet would be going onto the third group so if a losing bet i.e. three L in a row the loss in minimised avoids the 2/4/8/16 etc outlays,

hard to see how i could flat bet because in each group when the first bet does not win have to bet again. there are always two possibilities to win in each group or lose as the case maybe and a lot of the wins occur upon the 2nd attempt. flat betting works out pretty stable though since most wins occur on the 1st attempt just having the edge, so goes on a losing group, -2 on a 1st attempt win = 1+ and on a 2nd attempt win it's lose 1 then win 1 thus breakeven. so it's the % of 1st attempt wins over the losses, so far based on the above same stats goes like this,

1+ 2+ BE 2- 1- 3- 2- 1- BE 1+ 2+ 3+ 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 3+ 4+ 2+ 3+ 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 6+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 6+ 7+

and the 1/2/3/4/5/6 etc option would look like this based on the same stats, 1+ 2+ 3+ 1+ 2+ BE 7+ 14+ 9+ 10+ 8+ 9+ 14+ 9+ 12+ 7+ 8+ 12+

what way of playing would you prefer?

adding could turn out to be risky if three of more Losing groups occurred though the gains up to 14+ double that of flat betting, and a bit more over the 1 only double down way of playing.

Would like to know your thoughts on this anyone out there?
this system will also work well on roulette and other games moreover can be applied to the stock market because the ups/downs patterns are similar to baccarat outcomes and other games based upon my bet selections the strategy as a whole. This is one of the most powerful ways of winning at baccarat I have ever developed.

 

Just want to add, winning it's about taking a reasonable unit profit in each session. And building unit wagers overtime. 99.9% of the task is complete when you have a sure way of getting into profit within a session. From what I see thus far, I have found this way. I can run this by my data scientist over 150k plus outcomes to check it's long term visibility, but what's interesting is the up and down waves with a stable lingering profit range thus if one is not too greedy and ends a session with a reasonable number units as profit, s/he can build these units and slowly increase wagers after so many sessions by a % if s/he want to win more in money terms.

 

I'm up to checking 360 outcomes continuous shoe after shoe and using 1/2/3/4 etc adding unit wagers I'm up to 29+ units profit, clearly on the rise thus system is performing better than early results. This means gaining unit profits in a session is even more likely given the strength of my system. still not seen more than 5 losses in a row, i.e. no more than two lossing groups, thus betting 5 units based on the adding 1/2/3/4/5 was the most bet which results in a 5-. Have stuck with all of the above have not raised bets when winning though clearly there is that possibility of doing so given the Wins versus Losses ratio, but I think it's best to edge up minimising risk as much as possible.

 

Cracked it my arse.

 

Care to provide more insights?

 

I'm upto checking 410 outcomes manually and current stats up 24+ was up 31+ units, based on using adding progression 1/2/3/4/5, never laid out more than 5 units since so far have not come across more than a double Loss in a row. Most of the rules have been defined and I'm sticking to the same rules when considering every decision following my triggers. All wagering ways result in a win, i.e. flat betting, the one double down in each group and the 1/2/3/4/5 progression following losing hands. Have not explored increasing wagers following wins. Good range of wins in a row before a loss or double loss.

I think people who know me, people who email me, who read my books know that I don't BS because I follow it up by publishing my findings. Thus I would not be claiming that I've cracked it now when I haven't otherwise I would be made to look a fool.

My new system has an edge over my golden secret baccarat winning strategy. Given that my system is well capable of securing an each 5+ units plus in a session with almost certain ease.

I'll be completing the final testing over 154,000 outcomes to look at the win/loss ratio, the up/down waves etc etc, and defining any further rules. Once I have checked everything I will be publishing my findings. My regular readers who email me will be able to get access first. This system is so good it's likely to hurt casinos if enough people used it.

As I wrote it will work on roulette as well as baccarat and can be used on some other games too as well as on the stock markets (though with a few tweaks for the latter) given that in any set of random numbers, when my system is applied, it produces more wins over losses. When down, losses are recovered and when in profit it tends to stay in profit and/or holds its own.

Insulters, doubters and naysayers will not be engaged in convo.

 

You're full of shit! Go somewhere else and try to con and rip people off. I hear YouTube is a good place.

Your "findings" aren't worth a bill of beans and you haven't cracked shit.

 

Also I have cracked it. Only difference is, I'm not talking. Hehehe.

 

I smoked crack too. Now I know everything about it.

 

Baccarat is a game of pure LUCK. Strategy is worthless .

 

When people learn of my strategy as they will, and when they win using it, you'll be eating your words, there is no doubt, no doubt at all. As I wrote, I never state something and then don't follow it up. My stats are correct, my strategy is sound. Baccarat is not pure like and my strategy will prove this to be the case. It's only pure luck when you do not have a structured way of selecting which side to bet on and when to bet and how much to bet! My strategy does all this and I have proven it to work. When I publish my finding everyone will be able to test it.

 

Glad to learn that your new system has an edge your over golden secret baccarat winning strategy. Looking forward to your new platinum system in print.

 

Actually playing for luck is the strategy. Most players have never considered targeting it. Most never will. Funny how people have not put a lot of effort into strategies that try to do just that. Reading Randomness is all about that. Most people think it's about trends and patterns. But those are just excuses to make bet selections. They only work when you are in a win streak. Funny about that though. That tells you when you are in a win streak. MathZombies can't allow themselves to see this very simple concept, targeting win streaks.

 

You're starting to sound like Alrelax over at betty byes manic selection

 

So I decided to figure out what you are proposing here. I like it. I sort of do it already. I play the two step marti, doubling down, once in a while. But if I get a third loss on the next first try after a loss, because it might be two full losses of the two step marti in a row, I go to the virtual bet until back in more solid wins. I then play a short lived flat bet battle at step 2 value until I get that win. So I play a combined method of a mini marti and flat betting. Your pretty good coming up with this. In Roulette I get 12 sets feeding 6 groups to hunt many well practiced characteristics of randomness. So in a nutshell I play for three losses in a row at 1, 2, 1 and the wait to battle at 2 flat until a win. I also end a session on a win of 3 net wins. I never play all this as a fixed rule. I just go by the difficulty of the session. Most sessions are easy. If it's a long battle I just get out of it to fight another day. The point is to really win at gambling in the aggregate.

 

You are sort of dumb. Try not to sound so dumb.

 

I agree it's advantageous to try and exit a session with a realistic profit, x number of unit wins, also where banker commission is effective, the faster the target is reached the less one is exposed to tax, moreover where some of the selections are banker wins. Also time spent at the table. I'm aiming for 5+ if flat betting double that is using 1/2/3/4/5 progression. I might avoid the double downs for each group. I'm trying to improve on my system to tweak it to its optimal performance. To make sure targets can be reached thus unit wagers can be at much higher levels than the average standard bet size.

 

Bbbbbbbbwwwwwwwaaaaaaaahhhh, the nutjobbery and retardations is POWERFUL in this thread. But I just tune out automatic when cats make the scene with nonsenses about stop win/loss and taking profits at some abitrary point, hey hey.

 

Good work on starting a thread, but I like everyone else gotta buy another book RIGHT ? So do you refund the people that bought the golden nugget book as it was supposed to be THE BE ALL TO END ALL baccarat books out there , because clearly its not as per your posts this thread. Nothing like throwing a bit of burly into the water sure gets those fish churning. Anyway good luck as I previously posted If I thought your just selling I wouldnt waste my time reading this thread any longer
Cheers

 

At least the cricket back on , guess the world is ok after all . Haaaaaaaaa