Sometimes you have a convincing explaination, but in action, the explaination is just yet another wrong assumption. How to find out? Test.
True.
You're right. Too late to learn. The change is not feasible at this point.
Proof? Proof of what? From you? Nah, I'm still sane. I had a good laugh at this. "The moron from the gambling forums was right, he could read...
You and your name callings... You wasted your whole life on something that doesn't even exist, and now it's way too hard for you to let go. It...
You seem to have the answer.
Nah it's cool. I love to discuss the game with like-minded people. Have fun. :) Actually, it makes sense. A system that loses over time is not a...
Hey, what is this post about? I saw on the other forum you shared the same post, repeating "Shank"....
The system that wins sometimes is just a positive variance. Once in a test, I chose a random number of random numbers each round for 4000 spins,...
The problem with win and lose streaks is that there is no guarantee when you hop on them! You see a win streak on Red, you decide to bet on it for...
That's why people playing Vaddi's strategy always lose. Seeking a 55.68% probability of winning by playing up to 28 numbers. It's clearly -EV....
By the definition of the Birthday Paradox, the probability of at least 1 repeat within 8 spins is 55.68%. Playing 8 spins for a repeat results in...
I always avoided calling Birthday Problem "Birthday Paradox", because it's not a paradox, mathematically saying, it just seems like a paradox....
I know him by 4 other names. He could be faking something, but he is not a scammer surely. That's it. About your advice, I've had my own share of...
[ATTACH] New system, first try, very conservative approach, very slow in gains, real online casino rng. Stats: 1000 spins, +280u, max bet 4u,...
Separate names with a comma.
