Someone posted about a delayed oscars grind which i have been using seems ok, you need 5 winners before you go up 1step
ie -1,-1,1 -1,1, 1, -1-1...
if you had r r r and
b b b what would you bet on, the first two are different as are the second and third?
Thats a no then
WHYYYYYYYYY? stating the bleeeding obvious!
These posts why?
you may as well put up a post on how to make toast
D'Alembert i came across a chap on u tube who rated this as long as you start with 5 units for instance and not 1, as long as you have as many...
I always think of churchill as short and heavy(woke speak) we have to be careful what we say now, i didn't mean short eemm not fully developed, no...
W LW LW LL W LW LW W W LL LW W W W W W W LL LL W W LL W LL W LW W LL this is pretty good thou.
can somebody enlighten me?
31113 2 ....................WWWL 3,1,now go for 1 and win ,now go for 1 win, now go for 1 and lose,now go for 3 and win now go for 3(you need...
bb lose bbbb p(fictive win) p win b lose
bb -1 bbbb p 0 -1
bb -1 bbbb p 0 p win 1 up...
play number 1 for 36 spins if you win go to number 2 for 36 spins then 3 etc you may win you may lose.
i have had a go at this, repeaters are the downfall of my attempts so far.
i have found the mongoose method, not keen.
has anybody used 1,1,2,2,3,3 etc coming back once after a win until a new high is reached (slow and...
There is a full explanation on the 'rou*****for**cc
Separate names with a comma.