TurboGenius I did 100 TEST on Streets

I did 100 TEST on Streets.

@TurboGenius
I think... I did something right. Here.




https://ibb.co/PZTBjLZ

Each test is a new game in Roulette Xtreme when the winning street appears the game ends.
1st SPIN falls on STREET.
I'm starting to bet on "THIS" STREET.
The street appears, the game is over.

GREEN LINE is just 12th spin.
ORANGE Line is SPIN TO SHOW the STREET.
YELLOW Line is Average.

It seems that I finally managed to shorten the Average Value of SPINS for the appearance of a STREET.

Average of SPINS TO SHOW =8 SPINS

This happened 30 minutes ago.

 

Code:

number test/spins to win/average
1    5  
2    3    4,0
3    3    3,7
4    11    5,5
5    4    5,2
6    6    5,3
7    11    6,1
8    5    6,0
9    21    7,7
10    4    7,3
11    15    8,0
12    16    8,7
13    8    8,6
14    12    8,9
15    3    8,5
16    6    8,3
17    19    8,9
18    5    8,7
19    7    8,6
20    9    8,7
21    11    8,8
22    5    8,6
23    22    9,2
24    5    9,0
25    7    8,9
26    2    8,7
27    15    8,9
28    4    8,7
29    5    8,6
30    5    8,5
31    2    8,3
32    5    8,2
33    2    8,0
34    18    8,3
35    6    8,2
36    12    8,3
37    2    8,1
38    16    8,3
39    5    8,3
40    9    8,3
41    5    8,2
42    20    8,5
43    7    8,4
44    3    8,3
45    6    8,3
46    6    8,2
47    2    8,1
48    2    8,0
49    6    7,9
50    6    7,9
51    6    7,8
52    4    7,8
53    2    7,7
54    5    7,6
55    21    7,9
56    5    7,8
57    18    8,0
58    5    7,9
59    5    7,9
60    2    7,8
61    4    7,7
62    11    7,8
63    2    7,7
64    2    7,6
65    6    7,6
66    12    7,6
67    4    7,6
68    2    7,5
69    9    7,5
70    13    7,6
71    2    7,5
72    2    7,4
73    19    7,6
74    3    7,5
75    2    7,5
76    9    7,5
77    2    7,4
78    10    7,4
79    5    7,4
80    8    7,4
81    8    7,4
82    6    7,4
83    12    7,5
84    3    7,4
85    5    7,4
86    7    7,4
87    9    7,4
88    5    7,4
89    5    7,3
90    8    7,4
91    9    7,4
92    2    7,3
93    3    7,3
94    5    7,2
95    6    7,2
96    2    7,2
97    7    7,2
98    5    7,2
99    6    7,1
100    16    7,2

 

Nice test betjack, but these were only 100 tests or 100 plays. As I have showed in the other thread. You can have an uprising trend for 100's of play's. Go any further and it tanks. Thats why you always have to test rigorously.

 

@Chips
I am convinced @TurboGenius.
When he did THE HG.
He didn't test it 100,000 Spins to see it work.
Also, the Wining method does not need a huge amount of units to play it.

Everything else is digging in the wrong direction.

I've been there, I've done this.

 

If someone is wrong (proofed) 10 times on this forum (while claiming he is right on all occasions full heartedly), and says his way (the one he is using and we cannot test for obvious reasons of course) is also right. I'm very very very doubtful It actually works.

No indeed he did not test 100.000 spins to see it worked, and there lies the culprit now doesn't it? I've had many many sessions / tests where it went up an up for 1000's and 1000's of spins (you can see it here in my graphs as well.) Until it went back to 1:37 which it ALWAYS does.

I've got nothing more to say on this subject my proof and explanations make it perfectly clear for anyone to come up with their own conclusions.

I however would greatly appreciated it if @TurboGenius gave an honest answer on all the findings from the 6th repeater thread, (which unfortunately he has NEVER done in the past. if the hard questions or evidence showed up, turbo went dead silent.)

 

Hi, BetJack.
Very interesting observations you have. When I tested this, and I continue to do, my tests converged as Turbo did with W on L. W and really more than L. But the whole problem is spins. Because on my tests on real roulette, I already have all 3 dozen playing. The second falls and this L. I remove the stakes from the second dozen and raise the rate as in Turbo's example. A dozen 3 falls soon, and that's L. I'm taking the stakes off 3 dozen again, and I'm raising the stakes again. And then only after 17 spins will 1 dozen fall. Which in general is also L. Although it does not matter. Because given that W is greater than L, + -1 progression will always be reduced to 1. But it doesn't make a profit because you can wait for the last dozen 15-18 spins. And the other W hits fall much later before making a profit. And all this only brings losses.

So you're saying every street needs to hold no more than 8 spins?

 

Yeah I tested this a lot more than 100 spins. I did several games with 500 units bankroll aiming for $100 profit. It seems I dip below $400 more often than breaking $600. This is due to the zeros I'm sure. If not for the zeros it would be about even imo. I'm not a math guy so I can't test but I'm sure TG is legit is saying its over 60% wins. Sadly though I just can't make it convert.

 

It is always 66% wins and 33% losses. It doenst matter what bet you create or think of. Pick for instance 1 number lets say number 1. Play only that number. What are the losses and what are the wins over 100's of cycles. (meaning just play the number for 37 spins, if it shows it is a win if it doesnt show it is a loss.) 1000's spins further I've got 66% winners and 33% losers. So twice as much winners as losers. Did I win, NO the average win is 18 the losses are ALWAYS -37. 2 times 18 = 36 losses are -37 = -1 unit loss of every cycle. THIS IS THE MATH!!! It always does this, yes it is the law of the third and it is everywhere. Have we beaten the math??? NO, have we beaten the GAME??? NO, can we use a progression to WIN??? NO!!! @TurboGenius Still waiting on your response...

 

In case you didn't notice - we had a tropical storm/hurricane/tornadoes all around where I am. Unless of course you don't follow the news.
Running on a generator probably for another week or so until the lines are restored. Trees down everywhere and having things cleaned up.

You'll have to try to understand that posting, or replying to YOU is at the very bottom of my list of priorities.
Clear ?

 

No indeed I dont follow the news I personally think it is a waste of time and most of it is negative anyway so why dwell in that

But anyway best of luck to you and hopefully the weather will clear up very soon.

 

Take care and hope everyone is ok.

 

test are done manually in rx or do you have the system written in dgt file?