Baccarat Finally found a winning system!!!

yup yup, that man ruined it i was really about to post but that 4th poster left a bad taste in my mouth, and i was considering to tell me system in the future but then why? you all talked down to me! so there i made up me mind! Bagos what photo is your avatar? looks like from a movie?

 

Doofy from Scary Movie

 

Open up a bar on the highway with slots, good idea glen ?.

 

With Slots and Sluts, more profitable

 

Hello there. It seems we both have a system developed that works. I tested several ideas over a long time lately and combined, modified etc. and tested and tested and now I am playing this system that gives in playing more than one and a half month not a single STOP Loss yet. The stop loss is 7 units so When I win 7 times I could afford 1 x SL . But so far no SL yet so the profits are stacking up (and allow room if ever the SL would hit me) . May be we can exchange our systems and help each other? Today I played only game, I played 34 hands and made 3 units profit. Sure and steadily. Most days I play more games and win on average 10 units per day. So per day I could even afford to reach 1 SL and still have 3 units profit but so far no SL yet.

 

Sorry, you have to ask Bagos! he said if i let the secret sauce out it would be the end of the baccarat game blame Bagos Baggins!
that and i didnt like the tone i got back from this site =/

 

Dutchman,



Did you at any time lose 3 bets in a row ?





ND

 

That would mean that he only went to the fourth bankroll once!! hahahaha

 

Nathan, I wait until my conditions are met and then I bet and I do play Marty but maximal Marty 3 (1,2,4 units). This is the reason in case of SL that the loss is limited to 7 units only. But sometimes it takes (quite) a while until my conditions are met and I have also tried to loosen my conditions a little bit and start with 1/2 unit which allows to play up to Marty 4. Then I more often make 1/2 unit profit but if I loose in that case it would need 14 wins to make up for the SL. So it is a delicate balance to observe. In most games the conditions I am looking for occur 1-3 times typically. So to answer your question: No when I play the normal game and bet once the conditions are met I have never lost 3 bets in a row. IN most cases (estimated 70% I win the first bet and the I win another 25-28% the second bet and until now I have always won then the third bet to make up to 100%. Nevertheless, every hand does have a (approx) 50/50 chance so I know that the day will come that I will loose 3 bets and need a 4th bet or maintain the SL as recovery of 7 lost units is not a big task.

 

Thanks for the reply and some details .


ND

 

No matter what "conditions" you wait for, you'll still lose your bet more than half the time. Therefore you'll be nothing but a loser at the game.
This is fact.

 

You are not obliged to believe everything I say.

 

I already told him to shove his system where the sun never shines....lmao

 

A parade if pseudo winners twisting and bending until losses finally appear as winnings .



Rofl.

 

In theory you are absolutely correct. If you are so convinced that the house edge will hit everybody and destroy all Bankrolls, what are you doing at this forum? Simply calling everyone a loser? Does that feel good?

 

Warning beginners who could believe fairy tales ? Losing money isn't fun, is it ?

 

There is no "theory" about it. You need to go back to statistics class.

 

Let us not get spooked by the house edge. If you wanna dance you gotta pay the fiddler .


KNOW when to leave a session. Simple as that.


Either you have reached the win goal or the loss limit.

 

I play for win goal of 4 units and loss limit of 8 units flat betting. Problem is number of win goals does not compensate for the number of loss limits due to spooky house edge. Any suggestions to tame the spooky house edge and become a winner?

 

What is your bankroll for 1 session ? You are talking about winning 4 units and LL 8 units.


What are the percentages of those numbers of the session bankroll ?