Baccarat Wizard of Odds Rigged??

Hi all,

I won at casino guru and at pragmatic play, but lost at wizard of odds.

Anyone else have a similar experience?

Where else can you test baccarat strategies for free?

 

Gamespring has an app for your phone or tablet called Dragon Ace Casino wherein you actually play alongside other people for chips. No betting real money but the game is very “slick” and more than enough to practice with.

Find it in the App Store.

 

Never mind. I can also beat wizard of odds now.

 

Hi Zhang Wei, I can beat the wizard of odds Too, I just cant beat Dorathy.

 

Who is Dorathy?

 

Can you share what you using to beat the wizard of odds please .
Thank you

 

I am using whatever is discussed in this forum.

Not sure about bob.

 

I always wonder whether testing your method with random RNG shoes or even real shoes is of any benefit. Apart for getting training in executing your style of play on a real live shoe, I don't think results from testing matters. The only thing we can play with is probability which is to play with a progression and that will alter the payout ratio in relation to Bankroll at risk. Other than that, its flat betting. Anyone claiming having superior ability to decide B or P with right more than wrong is like saying Baccarat is not random and he/she had exploited the flaw. While it is possible to get on the right side more than the wrong side in one's lifetime at Baccarat, but the margin would definitely not significant enough. Don't forget there is a House Edge of 1+% to overcome.

 

Read gizmos thread reading random and apply his em / red black / high low / odd even ideas, plus you don’t have to bet every hand and I agree sim junkies are a cop out , but can be used initially to formulate your own game plan , rules and building some confidence before you set your life time bankroll on the line for real. As previously posted to you I play exclusively RNG stadium and MY personal opinion is it’s not rigged, you lose you lose , you win you win and as you say NO one can predict the outcome but YOU can profit , you just need to work out how. Cheers

 

She’s a influencer that mainly models red shoes, promotes kindness to animals ( has a dog called Toto) and walks marathon hence the shoes etc.

Hence the reference of being hard to beat, she’s mostly tagged, followed by the “Blue Rinse Set” and the gay and lesbian communities. Zhang Wei if you don’t associate with the three above communities and your less than 44 years old it’s understandable that you would not know who she is.
Oh she is considered a state icon of kansas and I would assume a supporter of the Kansascity chiefs nfl
Cheers

 

Here you are craps , I very rarely do other people homework for them, usually I believe it they are that lazy to not do some research then usually it’s not worth the effort to waste interverse space on them.
The above quote is some where in the last two page of read random thread, ( there are many more equally excellent snippets of thinking in that thread by the way) it is but one of many useful tools of contemplation available to everyone. There in lies a pathway to finding something that may work for one to profit in this industry. Or not but you can choose. Cheers

 

Thanks for taking your time to forward that statement but I tend to disagree. Pointing out the time a progression fails is completely short sighted.
The casino do give us options although those options are double edged swords. If you flat bet, you are restricted to one less option that is the choice of amount to bet. Now when you throw in the when to bet and where to bet and what to bet, you see those as gambler's edge but why leave out the amount to bet. Isn't that an option too?
Using a progression is simply changing the Probability of the game. Its like taking Mulligans when you flat bet. Imagine the House gave you 4 chances more to win a bet after you lost the first one. You will likely make a lot of those wins. The trade off is you need to use 31 units to win 1 unit.
The reason Martingale losses is because it is not used as a tool BUT used as a system. It is wrongly used as a 'money printing ' method where you will play to win as much as it allows you to. There were one reply of yours where you just brushed off the Hit & Run. To you, a pause in playing is not of any value. For discussion purpose, can you flat bet every hand of the shoe without sitting out? There my friend, you contradict yourself.
Denouncing the Hit & Run is like asking the player to bet every hand with Flat Betting. You do agree sitting out hands so that you can chart is of utmost important. Therefore a Martingale with Hit & Run do allow the Player to grind some profits in the long run. Anyway, I admire your superior ability to win with bet selection skill. I need probability in the true Math form.

 

Your welcome
Good post from you nice discussion
No I don’t discount hit and run, I referred to it as taking a break and definitely a FIRM advocate of taking a break. Play every hand not an advocate but I do play every in the session I’m committed to whether that’s a session of 1 hand or 5 hands or a 190 hands , not being flippant but my session varies in length depending on what’s happening. Enjoying your correspondence and we can see there is no wrong wrong way nor a right right way, still lots to consider.
Well put in words your explanation of martingale and agree with you. Cheers

 

My apologies Zhang Wei it was not my intention to hijack your thread . After a couple of posts on my part I have realised that is what has happened.
Sorry.
Cheers

 

I think he was referring to Dorothy, the character in book and movie, Wizard of Oz.

 

Somewhere over the rainbow GM3M1 makes me fly.