Baccarat The Final Solution

I played the variant described in posts #202-204
check it out
I thought we didn’t talk about the old march

 

I'll check thanks.

 

Here is Sputnik's March - Holy Grail - Flat Betting - Watch the whole video and you will see the different attack modes.
Following the Bias or following the wheel.

Cheers Patrik

 

I like this but I don't know how to slow the video down. First 50 spins only for Singleton's. Happens but not usual. If I can figure out how to slow it down aisle take a harder look.

 

I figured out how to slow it down all by myself. LOL

 

Jimske you are wrong with your assumptions - two events strike between 5 10 15 20 30 times in a row using Sputnik's March.
That is the bias.

To make a simple illustration

P B PP B P BB PP BB PP B P B P B P you see that in the video

BBB PP BBBBB PPP BB PP BBBBBBBBB PP BB PPP you see that in the video

PPP B PPPPP B PPP B PPPPPPP B PPPP BBBB PPPP B PPP you see that in the video

When you read the outcomes with the principal of 1/3 you get a whole different way tackle bias.

Cheers

 

Upload one more video for you Jimskey around 50 spins and +10 units of flat betting.
This had not have been possible if you did not follow the wheel and followed the bias.

Is pretty common to find strikes between 123456789 10 15 20 30 in a row.



Cheers

 

My suggestion when there is no clear bias is to break even and start over.
I am about to run a simulation by 10 to see the winning ratio.
The goal would be to hit several winning samples and a couple of break-evens and occasional losses.

My agenda with the videos above is for you to understand how to follow the flow - the bias.

Cheers

 

communication problem. Is an "event" and a "set" and a "block" the same thing?

Am I to understand that in the first example above there are four events in a row because of BB PP BB PP. ?

And what does baccproof mean when he says he plays "blocks of three" ?

Sorry no, I don't mean to be obtuse.

Sidebar: after 1536 live Wagers I have a strike rate 53.7%. Which I'm fine with but I'm trying to figure out what difference you're doing then me.

 

Jimske i think is great that you find such a solid strike ratio.
Personal I thinking to play U1D2 this weekend at my local casino.

Cheers

 

I don't know what to say - but using U1D2 is like taking money from an ATM machine using Sputniks March.
I apply the LL LL LL and LL LL W LL LL as losing sequences.
I guess that is the variant bacproof use.

 

Oh is that what he means. Yes I'm familiar with the Ellis"s modified Dalembert. A good progression all in all.

 

Okay little help here please. Maybe it will help someone else too. Just trying to figure out the placements on his video. I don't care about the amount bet just the W L for my comparison.

Maybe just write down when are lost next to the decision please. Thanks in advance.
R
R
R
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
R
B
B
B
R
R
R
B
B
R

Okay that should be enough. Happy Thanksgiving everybody who observes it.

 

Don't know what video is it from but the LW registry is per March is LW LW W LL W W

I ignored singles

 

Jim I am all kinds of confused with this but with my bet selection which is similar to how I understood the March, I would have won 12 units with this set of results. Sorry I’m not much of a help here.

 

You cant claim to have a HG without testing it longterm....i dont want to be negative but thats only some few short term results.

 

Thanks but I don't think he's ignoring singles.

 

True dat! But you can get a pretty good idea from a few thousand trials by looking at grabs averages and statistical limitations. You can also develop addition Pisgah Brewing from standard deviation with even a few thousand decisions. Of course there's always the Black Swan event.

So for instance how did the last 30 shoes and maybe 2000 Wagers only lost 4 shoes flat bet. And the "big" losers offset by "big" winners of similar magnitude. That's a good sign something msy be viable.

 

@Jimske Pisgah Brewing? Are you from the Carolinas?

 

He certainly was in a last video he posted. Always started his bet on 3-blocks starting with a double or tripplet and skipped all the singles unless they were a part of a 3-block obviously