TurboGenius Informational : What are your chances of winning ?

It's very impressive but as they say it utilizes Python and Java existing libraries. There is no library for Reading Randomness. That is what I'm talking about. You can't send instructions to this API and get results because there is no functionality specific to Java or Python that is the functionality of Reading Randomness. It's doing what computers do. It thinks, carries out instructions, and sends back results. Wait until it get's instructions to destroy the human race and executes it with all its connected robots.

 

I'm saying that it's 100% possible. I know this for a fact. I already did a very simple demonstration of this. You can download it from the software section here and click the AI button to turn it on. It will make bet selections and try to beat the casino. I just didn't give it all that it needs. It only wins some of the times. I always said that I would do this. I'm not going to build the RR libraries to do it all right. You want that? Give me One million dollars up front. I'm not going to blow that many brain cells for nothing.

 

OK, If I was younger I would make this my future. They used an external Java based API to have the openAI Codex do simple modifications by human text instructions. This goes light years beyond the Human Markup Language project of 1999.

Example using the openAI Codex with a Java based API for Reading Randomness:

Find all instances of the global effect and display by percentage value all above 70% on each line descending

After all. You might as well make RR perfect, in other words, far better than human.

 

Ok, but I don't know what "It must be after it analyzes the context of the situational awareness that is occurring simultaneously." means. Does this have something to do with what you call the "global" effect? Can you explain what this means in plain English? Spike says he takes his next bet from the last 15 spins at most, which means there are 2^15 = 32,768 patterns.

But on the other hand, you've said in the past that it doesn't matter so much what the bet selection is, it's more about when it's winning (and spike says something similar).
So how about this for starters : I take each pattern as a bet selection in itself, and see how the wheel is performing with respect to that pattern. e.g. if the pattern is BBRBRRRRBR the first bet will be B, then B, then R etc, and when I reach the end of the pattern I'll start over. Each pattern will generate its own sequence of W/L, so if I use the last 10 spins on a rolling basis I will have 1024 separate W/L sequences. After each spin they will all be updated and sorted according to the most successful pattern (the most wins in the last 10 spins). Bets will be made based on the top performing pattern, which will obviously be changing all the time.

I don't mind learning a bit more about RR but I'm not thrilled at the prospect of trawling through a 110 page thread, especially when there's so much dross in it. Can you create a new thread summarizing the method in one post?

 

See, already that's wrong. It's not just patterns, I look to see what it's doing overall. What it's been doing and if it's going to keep doing that. Much like your subconscious constantly analyzes traffic patterns in situations on the freeway. You could never do it consciously there's too much going on. That's why new drivers are such poor drivers. Their subconscious has not been trained yet over hundreds of hours on the road. No this is not mystical, no it's not Hocus Pocus. Go and watch some videos of vendors in India and Asia cooking food on the street. They're so fast and so accurate it's like they're performing magic. That's because their subconscious is doing all of the work telling their hands where to go. You can never do that with your conscious mind. Years and years of training has done that for them.

 

I totally understand why Gizmo does not want to do the code. Why bother, it would be pointless as far as making money goes. All it would do would prove is reading random works. Look at Thorp and his book on blackjack. He put an incredible amount of work into writing that book almost 50 years ago and to this day it's only sold a million copies. In 50 years. A new novel by Stephen King has 300,000 copies ordered before it's even released. The most well-known gambling book of all time barely sells a million copies after almost 50 years. There is no incentive for Gizmo to do all that work. It's not worth it just for an ego trip. And even if he did do it, even if he proved that it works, very few people would take it up because it's just too complicated.

 

Even though I have not read further from your post I will stop here and answer just this question. For one thing it irritates the hell out of me to do this. I spent as much as 100 pages in the RR thread giving the answer. Many have decided what it is by reading the first few pages. They don't want to do the work needed to find out what I have already published. So long after the fact they want me to do it all over again. I set out to give any person the prerequisite knowledge needed in order to understand the information that makes zero sense without it. Most people give up on that prerequisite knowledge and decide they know enough. I can destroy the gambling industry with just four or five patterns and trend combinations. In fact all you need is singles on the weak side, the absence of singles, continuous singles, and sleeping dozens. It's not just these basic figurations. It's knowing when to bet big against them. Now that is explained already in the RR thread. So I suggest that you put in the time and practice needed to understand this. I'm not going to do this again. The work on this is done. I hope you guys are starting to see a trend here. The work is done and there is nothing preventing you from finding out what I mean. I'm sorry if you think this is unfair or some how a deception. Several other people here have told you the same thing. It's in the RR thread. There is no quick and simple understanding.

 

No.

The thread is self protected so that it's not easy. The mathZombies did a perfect job of making it difficult. They make it so that you must read everything, so that I give away the secrets the hard way. Turbo did pretty much the same thing. Denzie figured it out by not giving up. I provide practice software for those with PC computers and I also show how to use Ruled Index Cards if you don't have a computer. You will learn nothing if you don't practice this stuff for a month or two. Also consider this. Spike and I have been at this for decades. He does it his way and I do it my way. Our groupings and sets are different. He watches for unique things that I don't. But what we both know is that randomness has a quality to it that you can read. It has characteristics and phases of quality. It's much more than just pattern and trend recognition. I would think just about any new gambler knows that trends and patterns don't work. Even the bottom thinking mathNazis know that they don't predict anything.

 

People making a penny for every word @SPIKE, @gizmotron, @Median Joe type on this forum are getting rich faster than Elon.

You guys making me wear out my mouse scroll wheel.

 

Your mouse has the scroll wheel? I haven't seen one of those in 12 years. It's got to be a collectible by now.

 

My mouse has a "Squeals like a pig trigger." And I'm not even a fag boy. You can write software that has unique appearance and sound effects. I use to fake being on board the Russian Mir space station and begging people from NASA to rescue me. Why not be a real jack-ass if you can do things like this.

 

um, wut…

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/razer-basilisk-v3-review-above-and-beyond

yeah, I don’t know why I use it…you 65 year olds definitely know better.

 

Running the 2/3 1/3 a bit differently.

 

Not sure how you play but if you choose your number(s) carefully then yeah.....those charts is what I get also. Good job Gary

 

No, thank you @Denzie , @Mako , and of course @TurboGenius .

Working hard and putting in the time. And not giving up.

Not saying it's all figured out but I'm getting there.

 

You'll get there. Test enough before putting real money on it.

Select your number(s) wisely and who knows you might do better then 2/3 (hint hint )

 

Yea. No money till I learn how to code or run it to a million spins by hand haha.

 

Hi Gary, if you want you can to contact with me by email in the contact section.

Regards!

 

@TurboGenius you didnt mentioned have you found any casino wheels there it says FAIL with roulette xtreme software. i have found some, does it mean its possible to win there

 

@Ka2 ... did you test this piece ? (Max wins and max losses in a row ... selecting the # from 0 to 36 for example)