Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Same thing with being brought up without calculators to do math with. When you use a calculator now days and you accidently put in a wrong number, you look at the answer and say that doesn't look right.

 

Yep, more than likely a questionable millionaire and Mormon....

 

You said: "When I first joined I almost deleted my account, because it was like defending 1+1=2." Here we are 2 years later and you are still doing the same thing. I know you have done all the calculations and probabilities of my strategy with the use of the Martingale and it all points to doom in the long run based on mathematical formulas. But you have never done the math regarding the actual way I play. Let's talk probabilites. I think I know the answers though before you respond.

What are the probabilites of:

XX folowed by X

XO folowed by X

XX Folowed by O

X followed by O

I would guess the answer is about 50/50 on the above

Now because I bet according to patterns forming we have this:

XXXXO I bet X which is still 50/50

OXXO I bet O still 50/50

OXXOO I bet X still 50/50

There are only three patterns that form in a series of play. What are their probabilites?

XOX
XXX
OXXO

Now the real question is, what are the probilities of placing a bet on the continuation of one of those 3 patterns with a 6-step Marty? In other words, there are 6 chances to guess right one of the patterns will continue. 6 chances to guess on a 50/50 probability. I am only placing a bet on one pattern at a time, not all three. If I guess wrong, a new pattern has formed. I now have 5 Marty steps left to guess the continuation of one of the 3 patterns.

So far, you have only submitted mathematical calculations in all of our discussions. As far as I know, you have never actually played the strategy on a simulator. You do not see what I actually see in play. You cannot anallyze the fact that Doubles are forming way more than usual through the series. XXO, I bet O and hit most of the time. You cannot see that the series is producing way more chops than usual. XXOXO, I bet X and Hit most of the time because a series of play produces trends that can be noticed and taken advantage of. If you do not actually try the strategy and only go by statistics, you will never understand the reason it does so well. I have already played the strategy way past short term. The win/loss ratio has remained consistant without the slighest wavering. This is a piece of my win/loss ratio: WWWWWWW L WWWW L W L WWWWW L L WWWWWWW L.

Tell me how much longer I have to play this damn strategy to prove it. Most everyone says that 327 sessions to a win of 64 units per session is just luck. Why have I never had this same kind of luck with any of the other countless strategies I have tried? Unless you actually try it, you will never have the real answer why it does this well. It's not luck. That many sessions played to a 64 unit win with a Marty would have crashed and burned 200 sessions ago.

 

Yeah.

 

I don't really care. I was just funning with you over your explanation of how valid you are. There is a better way though. If you were to give me a substantial grubstake I would use it at the casinos to validate my own stature.

 

I have tried the D'alambert many times and for me the Marty is much better. The Marty returns your bet with a win within the number of steps you use. The D'alambert constantly digs a hole deeper and deeper. The same bet selection tried on both, the Marty does better especially if your bet selection is real good. If you are encountering more losses than wins with the D'alam, you keep escalating to higher losses and cannot recover. If you have a real good bet selection using the Marty and are experiencing more losses than wins you can recover within a few steps.

 

Yeah, I have your personality figured to the tee. You are from California just like I am 50 years. I really understand CA. bs better than most. They do a lot of drinking first then out comes their profound statements.

 

I forgot to ask you where is my post where I explained how valid I am? I want to see what you are refering to. Nah. You just made that up to have something to say. Come on admit it.

 

You must be kidding. It's epic in the scope of what you said...

 

A substantial grubstake huh? I can give you the complete rules to my strategy. However, I would suggest you test it a little before you use it in a casiino. What casinos in CA. do you play at?

 

And quote exactly what I said. What did I say that makes it epic rather than what I said exactly. I have claimed nothing like others do. I have a strategy that I shared the results. I never said anywhere that it is the holy grail. I never even said it is the holy mary or the our father. What I did say is it has been successful for me, here it is, test it for yourself. Then make your criticizing remarks if there is any. So far, nobody has done that. The only remarks I get is how stupid it is to use a Marty before they even apply it with my bet selection. So what I have here is nothing from everybody. If you want to pick on somebody, pick on Spike. He makes outrageous claims without submitting one iota of proof. At least you do share and try and prove yourself.

 

Marti better off at Baccarat no green zero to interfere .

 

Betting 1 2 anti trend is also a martingale .

 

My favorite on the west coast is the Barona near El Cajon in the San Diego area. They have nine live Roulette tables and an 80 seat stadium with independent consoles all generated from one live wheel. Second is a new casino near Portland Oregon called the ILani. It's got at least 12 live Roulette tables. There are some nice ones around Sacramento like Lincoln area. Then there is Stateline Tahoe.

 

Two things. You are attempting to gaslight me or you are attempting to run a red herring scheme. Just look up your own comments in past posts. You will find it. Meanwhile I like you this way. You don't know what you said.

 

Here it is. This is epic.

 

WHO is the REAL owner ? Wifey ?

 

The story is crystal clear . The American way of today. Who owns what .

 

That's my thinking too.

 

Oh.