Baccarat Betting Flat: Quest for an Holy Grail?

Yeah, I'm the problem. Whatever..

 

This entire thread is full of contradictions. Sorry to have come to this conclusion.

 

My style has been restore so i can respond to yer question. I've been playin live online buckin up against the evolution gaming speed game what I test against. I've been grinding volume, 9 hours/18 shoe per day, so about 432 shoe per month. So far through 1200+ shoe my average nets profits is about .81 units per shoe. I'm workin with a blacks chip base units flats bet so capture over 95ks nets profits. But, in my testing of over 16, 000 shoe my average nets profits was around 1.24/1.25 units nets profits per shoe so my style, thus far has underperformed my testings result by about 50%! But, I'm confident that after I grind sufficient, maybe 2000 or even 3000 shoe that eventually my result will lock in at the 1.24/1.25 units nets profits what I capture during testings. Just go to show you that even longs term winnings style can run bad or said better run sides-way or underperform for more than 1000 shoe. But then I live in the real world and am honest about my play and the adversity I buck up against. Also, so far my worst case down-draw scenario has been -75 units so inline with the worst case of -83.5 units clipping I encounter during testings, hey hey.

 

I pony up the result of a recent stretch of shoe 1034-1066 inclusive, hey hey.
+2.6
+3.4
-3.35
-1.4
+7.5
+3.35
+4.45
+2.5
-5.25
-.25
+4.6
-.45
-5.25
.65+
+7.45
-3.35
+1.35
+6.5
+3.55
+5.55
-4.4
+1.55
+1.6
+8.5
+5.5
-7.35
+1.6
+2.45
+7.45
-1.3
-2.4
-2.5
-3.4

 

That's good to hear. Keep grinding and taking the casino's money. Thanks.

 

The last couple of Soxfan posts surely deserve a ROFLMAO!

Rumour has it that he went to this casino and won a few million. By all accounts, he killed it on the rock, paper + scissors.

 

Ok, cool-guy. pony up some cake for the challenge and I'll prove my style. I ain't a retard splittin labby srtring, wagering on tie and mirror the wager of oriental cats with app in a nps-sack. And I never claim to capture 700 units profits in ten minute with a fib at a sw-dusts joint down-under. Now that nonsenses and foolishness is worth the nons-stop ROFLMAOX1000, hey hey!!!!

 

Bbbwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh, before ya know it ya got all kind of chap and bloke comin outta the woods-work and droppin outta tree, hey hey!!!!

 

Soxfan deserved those likes for his method of playing the game .


Leave those Stu Pitts remark at the baloney festival .

 

.............or are we in the twilight zone ? Testing or casino play with inflated chip value .

After all it is the internet where anyone can be what they c hose to be .

 

My claim are modest and realistic cuz they are true. Others make the scene with talls-tales and bulls-shits, about capturing ridiculous amounts of proifts never lose a session, 88 percent strikes rate, makin cake well and regular on the tie and all manner of nonsenses and foolishness. Unlike the bulls-shits artist on here I admit to facin adversity and said straight that so far my style has under-perform significant through my first 1200 shoe. And unlike the bulls-shits artist on here I will subject my style to scrutiny, challenge and prove my claim, hey hey.

 

I detect no reason to doubt you . Bet selection Banker and flat betting .

sounds god to me .

 

P.S I am wagering in sessions not shoes .

 

I think that some cats been eye-ballin too much of the peeky-blinder foolishness what they show on the telly these day, hey hey.

 

Great job Soxy, thanks for the update. I believe those stats and it's about what I'm getting in my limited testing of My selectively flat bet banker only selection... I'll post the five shoes from today on a separate thread.later.

I'm.also making $100 bets and.playing all.shoe,.I fooled.around with waiting for.a.virtual.win before starting.because i thought it.woud.help, but it didn't.. sometimes.i get 5+ losses from.the.onset .

I.wouldnt trust this method online because the disconnect issues, what casino are you playing on?

 

It's great! Any roulette player who has a handle on the dozens should give it a try to see if it suits.

 

With EC bets one can chose any which way .

 

Really? Good, looking forward to it. He won't answer me because I'm the guy who actually checks stuff out. I'm not saying his results are untrue. I am saying the math doesn't lie. If he is actually accomplishing this then I don't think it is a mechanical fixed flat bet B only method. The reason is he states an average of wagering 20 hands per shoe. Keep in mind that there are only an average of about 37 B per shoe to bet on. So, cut to the chase, he must be getting about a 55% strike rate in order to achieve the 1.25 net units a shoe. That's the math. So my conclusion is that IF his reports are accurate, he is likely using trending. MM and/or small progression.

J

 

Jimske , I have given you a like but not every one is playing "shoes" but sessions .

 

?!$!? What? He says shoes and 20 wagers a shoe. So you might say every 100 wagers is about five shoes.