Las Vegas The Verdict Is?

I thought I would pose the simple question, hey hey.

 

This is your right, but do you really think such a poll on THIS forum, is unbiased?

This would be like going into North Philadelphia and asking who likes Fried Chicken.

At least another forum you are a member at would be a better mix. There are trolls and haters there as well, but not JUST trolls and haters.

 

Well, we all have our own biases, and I think that most cats participate on both forum. I have noticed that some cats will take side just based on the personalities. That ain't my style and if I think a cat is playin it straight then I'll say so, even if I might not find a cat likeable on the personal level, hey hey.

 

Bbbbwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh, things and stuff ain't lookin good for the kewl-J thus far, hey hey!!!!

 

It's his own fault, not only did he present a multitude of contradictions and misstatements, but he also kept changing his story and ferquently declaring that he was trying to mislead people deliberately, then later go back and present facts that contradicted his misleading! Really, just a joke of a narrative.

No proof whatsoever offered too.

Not that he ever has offered any proof, for anything he has to say.

For all we know he died, because he did put the story out there that he was dead, and this is some other cat pretending to be UNKewlJ! Or maybe he came back from the dead with massive brain damage like Frankenstein which further explains his inability to keep to or tell a coherent narrative.

 

If any cats think that the kewl-J is playin it straight then they can come over the top and make a case for the boy, simple and plain, hey hey.

 

Funny--he's always putting up polls of his own, claiming his target is all bs. Now that he's the target of a very valid poll, he whines like a little bitch because he KNOWS he's lying and he knows he's been caught red-handed. Which nicely also explains his very red face.

 

Lol
Even his/it’s/her/their sock puppet’s belief is that he’s a liar .

The silent majority obviously don’t give him any credibility at all either. Face it if Any one of them thought he was credible at least one of the many that never post would have come out of the shadows and posted in support of him/it/she/them by now.

So he/it/she/them are seeing the folly of multiple people using one account name and the voting limitation it imposes. Lol.

Perhaps soxfan the real poll should be
“Administration is it time to label kewlj as a confirmed liar”

Soxfan, Love your work as usual and record a resounding YES vote from me.

“Yes” kewlj is a liar
“Yes” admin should permanently label his/it/she/them account name as such.
Cheers

 

No doubt the 2 voting for UNKOOL1 are V and Comrade. Who else would stoop so low

 

Sorry Ozzy, but I am sitting out voting on the two polls (here and at VCT).

Frankly I'm undedcided.

 

In that case it would be REDietz and the UNKewl one himself? Although - it doesn't make a lot of sense that REDietz would vote for UnKewlJ actually, so more likely that it is UNKewlJ and his sock puppets, in a, as AccountInQuestion has put it: Neverending quest for street creds on the internet.

 

That has to be the most unkindest cut of all, really ripping UNKewlJ's heart apart. How can he take it? His last remaining supporter, resigned to a wait and see position. I remember how hard he took it when Ozzy but especially accountinquestion, turned on him. He must be reeling.

V, given that UNKewlJ has stated repeatedly that the lawsuit is filed and served, that many APs know all about the event, and that the press has already contacted him about it...how long will you allow the clock to tick in silence before throwing in the towel?

 

Probably two months: a lot can happen in that amount of time.

I've not concluded that he lied to the forum and to me, personally...yet.

But even if I conclude he did so I will still believe he knows his stuff about black jack and playing conditions in sin city.

 

I ain't cast the vote in this poll yet. Zeus knows I ain't the brightest bulb in the drawer and I'm just a lowly law-school dropped-out makin due with a paltry 157 but there is one particular aspect of the kewl-J backed-room narrative that make NO SENSE LOGICAL to me, at all, hey hey.

 

What is a "paltry 157?"

A law school drop out, eh?

When you took contracts in your first year, were there any jokes?

The Dean of the Law School taught us; he had a dog named "Trover."

One joke that circulated first year contracts still resonates, to wit: "She offered her honor, he honored her offer and was on her and off her all night."

 

Im sorry but he shows nothing more than your average moron or anyone can glean from tv, movies, paperback novels ( prison issue) YouTube or the interverse forums such as this site. Mho is the information supplied is plagiarised regurgitated pap. The claim of it’s the “MAPHJIZZ” is just that . Jizz.
You don’t play ( your claim this forum, various threads , you are a “recreational” player) so you’re easily duped . Here’s a thought, how long in minutes/hours/days do you think playing 2 million hands of black Jack ( his claim this forum) actually takes? Then you fit that time frame into “ playing under the radar mostly on weekends across 30 different venues for 20 years during which 2 years was in on and off shutdown/Covid, deducting holidays, deducting sick days, deducting back room lol , deducting travelling to different cities for “bj” deductions for sleeping etc fuking c. ” AND claim it’s MAPHJIzzzzzz. Oh then factor in the 1:5 million dollars earned also lol. His claim this forum.
Yes the only bj jizzzz we are talking about is blow job jizzz and that’s not math.

Next time you do a recreational casinoverse donation, stop by a real blackjack table and time how many hands are playing, any day/ night of the year and you will see through his MAPHJIZzzzzz like everyone else does.
You could even ask other blackjack players here for this information or any other forum you are comfortable with. They will tell you what you SHOULD know as a base understanding of table games that you possibly could have spent the time learning BEFORE you enter your opinion into to discussions with the “for and against” various posters this forum or other forums on the interverse. The adage sleep with dogs get your butt sniffed rings true, you get labeled just another butt sniffer, the slippery slope to all that is you end up be a ball licker also. Mho.
So are we to expect a backflip on the claim?
If so does that qualify as another lie?

 

So I am a "butt sniffer" and "ball licker" because I tend to find KJ knowledgeable about blackjack and playing conditions in sin city without me first having a deep grasp of blackjack as foundation for my opinion?

Wow.

More than half of humanity believe in the existence of an invisible being who created them and controls their lives on earth like a master puppeteer, and they have zero proof or foundation for such a deep-seated opinion: are they all butt sniffers and ball lickers too?

Punk, I don't sniff butts or lick balls; I merely read, think, and comment, all three occasionally affected by cannabis.

In the end it's all just shits and giggles anyway, eh?

 

I believe you're not a butt sniffer or ball licker. UNKOOL1 on the other hand..,......

 

Thanks Ozzy.

 

Re read the quote you are referring to.
Maybe straight thinking instead of pothead mode.
You is referring to the generic you , nowhere is it stated in the original post that
“You, Mr v” sleep with dogs and sniff butts which label “you Mr v”as a butt sniffer. Nor does it stat that “You mr v lick balls”

Im sure you are used to having staff at the law firm do all the investigating, collecting evidence and forming an opinion script that you go to court with and defend your client, thus leaving your mind from having to think for yourself. Unless you just took the defendant’s word,therefore negating need of staff input, the criminal ( kewlj) “I’m innocent” as all the evidence you Mr v needs to mount a defence and pronounce to all and sundry that you are convinced and so should the rest of the world be suitably convinced.

As for religion, it deserves it own thread , but in passing you seem to be equally ignorant of that subject matter as well.

My comment to you was do some research next time you degening your cash to the casinoverse , it’s a simple 5 minute exercise, ask the dealer how many hands they deal per hour etc.

Maybe you could impose on your ex staff to do some thinking for you and email that opinion to you, if you can’t get to a casino.
Or not , as I would assume you wish to remain uninformed and ignorant so you can blame your muck stirring posts on its the “ pot” talking , rather than admit that you just agitate for “ shits and giggles”
Get kewlj to open his own forum and go with him.
You have a pot happy day