Baccarat what progression are you using?

That's a great question. I wonder if it is possible to take EC bets and break them into thirds? It would take using 50/50 bet selections, that are binary in their individual form, and using them in sets of three.

That will make me think a little. I could use them in Craps. I don't play Baccarat.

I'll work on this, tomorrow.

 

Ok retard, pony up, starting tomorrow! Let cats see exactly what a clued-less, lying, loser, bulls-shits artist you are! And after you flunk the challenge I hope you'll have the common decency to fuck off and not make the scene on here after-wards, hey hey.

 

@soxfan

Okay bully smoke blower. I'm off to Nantucket today but I'll be back on the 5th.

You can post your shoe now or wait. Pick any shoe you want.

Bye

 

It makes no sense to break it up into thirds.

I just need an Up & Pull progression for EC's.

So the first step is 4 parts of $10 each where you reduce one of the parts after each win.

First bet = $40. On win take off $20. You have -$20 remaining in the game.

Second bet = $60. On win take off $40. You have +$20 stashed away and are still in the game.

Third bet = $80. On win take off $80. You are $100 ahead with one more step in the progression to go.

Fourth bet = $80 On win take off remaining $160. You won all four steps of the progression and are $260 ahead.

All this while taking a little as you go, diminishing your risk as you go, and only sticking around for 4 wins in a row.

 

I'm not gonna post a whole shoe so you can make shit up after a fact! You must think that I'm as retarded as you are and I ain't. I will post up legit, live dealt Evolution Gaming baccarats result and you come over the top callin g your wager for the next hand, simple and plain, hey hey!

 

@ soxfan...sooo you won't make it up as you go along? You and only you can be trusted with such a test...... Just say what it is you want. You want Jimske to explain step by step how he makes his decisions. Just like your buddy on here with lets make a system together and then opens with a question without an answer. He would have known that if he truly understood the game. But was hoping someone actually had the impossible. Noone somewhat successfull is going to lay out for you step by step what they do. Soo crawl back under the rock you came out of.
The testing brew haw is completely played out.

 

Google doesn't explain anything.
The only part I understand is don't bet more than 5% of your bankroll.

 

The good thing about Kelly style is that you can be as aggressive or conservative with it as you like. Maybe later on I'll pony up the example of how to use Kelly style at the baccarats, hey hey.

 

what? No peeky. What's the point'? Lucky guesses wins? The whole idea is to play like a machine. Doesn't matter whatsoever the next decision because the method never changes, pfffboy!

 

The terms of the challenge are simple, dummy! You play against real result on a fly in real times and IF you can show a nice consistent profit buckin up against a coupla hundred shoe then everyone can say that yer a serious cat and I'll put 1000$ usd, tax free cake, in yer pockets. Simple and plain, hey hey.

 

And what are you going to do?

 

The terms of my challenge are simple and plain. I reveal one decision at a time then you come over the top and state what yer next bet would be player, banker, or no-bet and for how many units. I don't want to know my you are makiin yer bets, and yer style is basically guessings so no chance of me wasting my time and efforts to try and out-guess yer guessings so as to rig the challenge, simple and plain. This is a risk free opportunity for you to show cats how you manage to NEVER EVER EVER get clipped or face any sort of adversity and pocket an easy 1000$ usd in the process, hey hey.

 

Figures. You want to sit and watch me play. A bullshit challenge. You got to prove your claim. That's the challenge. Flat bet B winning 1.5 net units a shoe with an average wager 20 units a shoe? Let's see. . . what's that 7.5 net units per 100 wagers captures what; a 55% strike rate sounds about right. Maybe Stephen will fine tune the math on that?

You play I play what difference does it make if I guess or not? You are the one who isn't guessing (ahem, pfff) You want me to play without guessing. Okay. I will define a bet placement and use my progression. Then anyone can follow along if they want.

What I said was I ever have busted out my progression. It could happen but hasn't. I also said I rarely lose a shoe. There's a reason for that. Patience wins. In fact here's one from the other day. I saved it because I wanted to show a friend of mine. Very unusual for me to have to play through three shoes to get even or just recoup. Ended at a 45% strike rate. That's about what I need at the lower end to get back. I don't normally play this many hands in a shoe but after 7 LIAR out of the gate I know I'm into a long haul unless I get another 5+WIAR real quick. Could happen.

LLLLLLLWWWLLWWLWLWLWWLLLWL 38%

WLWLLLLWWWLWWLLLLWWLLWLLLLWWWL 43%

LWWLWLWWW QUIT 66%

So play your claim or shut the f u c k up! You're better off pivoting back to your name calling.

Hey, I got an idea. I will play 100 shoes using your other 4 units a shoe net method that you ballyhooed for awhile. Yep. I'll play your "SUREWIN." Got a good chance. It wins at least 80-85% of shoes. Those 12 or 15 losing shoes are a real doooooozy though at -275 units a pop!

Cheers

 

And furthermore FYI I didn't get close to busting out. Only about half way.

 

The only one I am aware of that uses those terms is "Ultimate Baccarat" invented by an old friend of mine.

Essentially it uses TBL and OTBL, waits for three decisions and then chooses to bet either the Majority of the last 3 or the Minority. It was a flat bet method. Play it out and see what kinds of patterns it wins and loses to. Nicely patterned shoes will win Majority betting. So 22222 or long chop or long streak will win Majority betting either OTBL (22222) or TBL chop or streak.

Cheers

 

The term of my challenge are simple, do you accept or not, hey hey????

 

I use it as KISS betting style with a tweak of NOR its a mile better than GUESSING. Then use
flat bet/periodic increase negative & Positive combination. This BS can be modified in many ways according to your wanted style. Its an excellent BS for me.
For those wanted to apply do it as SO not player or banker.

 

Struggling SHOE USE MINORITY BETTIG: if Using MONGOOSE, SUREWIN, HOLLEWAY, HAMMER, BOXER.

 

I say old chap, I really wish that you come with the subs-title so I could understand what you was tryin to say, hey hey.

 

SO = Same opposite instead using P & B. SSO =minority betting Opposite OOS = Minority betting S Same thats minority betting applying it in OTBL & TBL read the ultimate baccarat . english language is very difficult. Betting Selection