Baccarat Anti Streak Betting

But they say mechanical styles always breakeven in the long run.

 

Agreed. But nobody is talking about hunches...

The nice thing about that statement is that it's very simple to prove whether such exists or not. If you want to talk science and mathematics then show the documentation. Simple.

 

How can you say that when, mechanically just bettin bankers everyhand yer gonna win just under 51% of yer placed wager. And if you make dumb wager on players you WILL WITH CERTAINTY diminsh yer strikes rate, hey hey!

 

Unfortunately I experienced the opposite of what you said. I busted a lot of progressions betting banker every hand. Only when I include player bets did I managed to get 51% win rate.

 

Your result must be shorts-term because longs-term that is just not possible, hey hey.

 

Must be, short term, blah blah, spunksox...you're full of absolute mango infested monkey jizz.

 

Another dumb, loser piece of shit what ain't got anything useful or worths-while to say about the proposition. Why don't you give the ai a shot, it's certainly better than anything that yer low iq pea-brain wil, come up with, hey hey!!!!

 

Jesus, like talking to a 4 year old. Why aren't you in the casino? Just finished here, 3 am, been good...oh yeah, you don't go to casinos...figures.
Ps, did I mention, go f&ck yourself with your bulls&t winning streak lols

PS Junket King was absolutely right about you. Unlike you, I have met a few players, unfortunately for you they don't play kitchen cashew nut chips, over, over.

 

Another dumb fuck retard gone on iggy, hey hey!!!!

 

yeah, sure, no argument, so ignore me lols. We all know you still read the posts. like I said, you're full of sh%t. If you even fancy a real play session in a real casino, let me know. Your place or mine. I know plenty of players your side of the pond who can verify, if you fancy ever dropping your cannock shit, I'll show you how really sh*t the Uk casinos are, but still butt f&ck them anyway.

As for your $10k money that want to provide to prove yourself, jesus, just go f&ck yourself, not worth the monkey spunk filled mango you're chewing on right now.

 

LMAO. He almost has you convinced, huh? Don't forget. He doesn't include the 5% vig.

See, he's not so dumb? Bet B and win 50.7 or 1.4 units per 100 hands. Unfortunately you got to pay 2.5 units to the house! Guaranteed lose only 1.13 units per 100 wagers! What's wrong with that?

Send him a PM and ask him to tell you his secret bets. Bwahahahhaa!

 

I bet every spin in order to keep the seat at the table. It's a rule in some places. So I bet the table minimum, usually $5. Lungyah recommends 20 times that amount for the attacking bet amount. This depends on the bankroll. Lungyah is a high roller. His attacking amount is around $20,000 to $25,000 per bet.

I would sit out many bets in a row if I could.

 

It's happening. Everything depends on how I convilese in the next six to twelve weeks

Thanks

 

You are right about RR seeming to be off topic. But anti streaking is still about bet selection based on trends or patterns, if I'm right. I've tried it. I've tried to base the bets and amounts on the opposite of what I would have bet had it been a trend.

The difference is that I try it in a swarm of the effectiveness state being dominant in the not working phase.

Now this might be off topic from what you wish to discuss. Just let ,me know please.

 

Still way off the mark. It's based on conditional awareness. No feelings, hunches, ESP, or pet magical thinking superstitions.

Now maybe the anti streak thread here is something different. People suck at trend playing because it never always works. It just works for a while and then it changes. You can know this. To me, anti streak is identical to streak. But I would love to be taught differently.

 

Yeah, strange that, seems Spunkfan has the "secret sauce"...only it doesn't exist and he's been trolling forums for over 20 years.

 

Consistently win short term = win long term

 

I tested the anti-streaks style and it captured a consistent nets profits of about 1.75 units buckin up against 23 000 tested shoe. But anti-streaks can be volatile style and got clipped for downs-draw of about -370 unit. And anti-streaks can run bad on ya for stretches of a coupla hundred shoe, so it's a grind, baby, hey hey.

 

-370 units is crazy.

 

No it’s not .
You and other may or may not believe or agree with soxfan but the underlying premise is he has stated long ago that he has a substantial bankroll.
This simple fact
A substantial bankroll is exactly what 99.9999999% of people that try to make a living/ profit at baccarat DO NOT HAVE.

Most and let me clarify this from my personal experience , I did many years ago try to succeed with the minimum bankroll because I thought what I initially devised would succeed as many of you undoubtedly think the same about your current method. It did not succeed, cue many bankroll losses plus many changes of methodology. As per many of you know from your own experiences is true.

Soxfan established a testing regime, coupled with a bankroll estimated at X$ then through more testing came to conclusions of $ xXX will be a comfortable bankroll to withstand any drawdowns ie -370 units.

Personally I believe the information provided by soxfan.

I too after many years had came to the same conclusion regarding bankroll death and methodology employed. Rather than changing methodology due to constant bankroll death, I , personally choose to increase my bankroll to suit my initial unit bet size BECAUSE I was extremely confident in my selection criteria.

My selection criteria does in fact lose on occasions, sometimes 2 or 3 days in a row, but it actually wins at plus 52% and a sustainable bankroll is the key to handling the monthly drawdown .

You don’t take a knife to a gun fight.

Know your method
Know your worst drawdown
Know the sustainability of bankroll requirements
Know from what you learn as a experienced professional
Know your emotional makeup, many can’t handle a sustained-370 unit loss and that is exactly what the casinoverse wants.
This is generic you questions
It’s good food for thought.
How well do you handle a -370 unit drawdown?
Do you believe in what your method is?
Does your method stand the test of time?
Have you the correct bankroll for the method you use?
Can you handle emotionally the extreme drawdown amount?

It’s a business, no room for emotion or lack of capital if you are playing for fun your just a degenerate gambler.
Cheers