TurboGenius Gambler's Fallacy (absurd ?) Proof.

Yup , clearly....unless you add some hotties in the mix for example #28 or maybe #7 ,...

Analyze each session and improve it.... if you play the hottest ( for a few hits ) and the ones that's "catching up" for a few hits you'll notice it's hard to not be in profit.

 

@Gigi666 email sent!

 

How do you feel @Denzie about shortcuts, like using data from last X spins that is readily available on online live dealer tables?

 

Very reliable. I'm only playing at sites that's approved by the Belgium gaming commission. These are under strict supervision. I've also tested it by asking my friends to look for the last 500 spins ( as some sites offer) and compare them with mine. All good. Just stay away from sites that aren't supervised. For example here in Thailand ( yearly holiday) it's illegal to gamble but tons of online sites from Cambodia pop up. I would place a single unit on those .

 

I wouldn't **** ( damn auto correct)

 

I played over 10 games, looking mainly at last 100 interval and every time hots were doing better than colds trying to catch up. The fact I had to play usually less hots than colds eventually added more negatives for playing cold numbers becoming hot.

 

If 1 or more numbers "catching" up while playing a decent progression.....up on a win ( it's a vague term I know)

If you draw a horizontal line where all numbers start . You'll see numbers go up and numbers go down all the time. And if you have enough time you could most certainly and definitely profit from the numbers at the bottom. Again and again. With a solid MM it's a real moneymaker

You'll be in profit already way b4 you even on those last #

 

1..Yes !
2.. No , it always wins !
3.. Mostly not but it's possible !
4.. Lol . Really? No stop when you lost . Lmao. Yes, of course.
5.. No way. How on earth would you do that with all that counting spins and taking notes. Well ok, I can't.
6.. At home definitely. Is it allowed in B&M ?
7.. If played right it sure is .

 

Geometric CDF = 1 when you go far enough.

I believe 225 missed spins for splits (could be wrong on exact number). The math certainly imposes limits on random.