Baccarat Soxfan Flat Holy Grail

71 Shoes profit 6 units gross. What's weird is the first 36 shoes got all 6 units while the last 35 shoes ened up with 0!!! Huge downside on those before it turned zround.

It's easy for me to go through shoes since I have them all photographed. I really can't imagine having to sift through pages and pages of spiral ring notebooks containing more than five thousand shoes!! OMG!

In the 5 shoes Hugh posted with results only one was accurate but were very close to not be a big deal. Easy to make mistakes when your "eye-ballin." I'm pretty sure my quick count had some errors, too.

But he's somehow playing 18 shoes a day. And he's calculating commission as well? Wow. So my 71 shoes would be like 4 days bleary eye work online?

No kidding, Hugh? You still got my emai, right? Write and tell me how you do it. We'll talk like the old days
Cheers

 

Hugh must be going through some very tough shoes based on that assessment.

 

is hugh soxfan and does it mean you know how he plays. I have not seen he reveal anything to test it
the streak pattern thing he once said obviously do not work

 

Let's give Soxfan the benefit of the doubt and say he can win flat betting betting banker only. Well there are plenty of smart minds on here, so how is he doing it?

 

It's better to not give him the benefit of the doubt then the answer is easier to figure out.

 

I just want to hear what other people think and see if they have any ideas on how they think it might play out. I came up with something myself tonight having never really thought much about it before. It came up well in a quick 100 shoe test and so will share it tomorrow.

 

Well unlike you and the other bulls-shits artist I'm willing to pony up and prove my style if cats pony up some cake and provide legit baccarats result. Yer a joke and laughings-stock on these forum, just like the kewlJ-pinnochio, hey hey.

 

Hey hey, douchebag. LOL

 

but lets do the challenge. i figured out this sentinels strategy where numbers match. Im testing how it performs in long term and you can also share your results

 

No offense but that is because you are not paying attention. He has voluntarily given many examples.

Sure, everybody deserves the benefit of the doubt.

He's already stated more than once that if he loses it's because the shoes are not "legit." Problem with that is he's playing a "Heads I Win, Tails You Lose Game."

 

The biden-spike will NEVER pony up and accept the challenge as he will be exposed for being the buffoon, and liar sack of shit what he is. Nonse of these clowns will accept the challenge, hey hey.

 

Come on dumb-fuck, a thousand bucks buys a whole heap of cats food, hey hey.

 

Pfff. This is a phony challenge from our resident bullshiter. Go ahead and prove it. I can find a thousand bucks in my couch. I'll be happy to send it. Put up or shut up.

 

Where would you ever get $1,000 from, sell one of your kidneys? Nobody would want it cuz it's satuated with illegal drugs and almost useless even to you.

 

@soxfan I accepted your challenge and i'm still waiting. I'm pretty sure I already know what your bet placement is. It's a big loser just like you. But just as @baccarou says I give the benefit of the doubt. And can't wait to send you $1,000.00. So pony up the method and make me look foolish!

Jimske

 

i been doing challenge myself between sentinels and soxfans strategy and after month results sentinels has 120 units and soxfan if playing 4 shoes per day has same few plus minus here and there

 

You do realize we are playing a fixed bet selection? So what is the bet selection(s) you are using?

 

Perpetual motion machines are impossible due to the laws of thermodynamics. Winning with flat bets is impossible due to the laws of mathematics when there is a vig against you.

 

if you mean fixed by flat then yes we are both aware of soxfans strategy sort of. Sentinel is also mainly using flat, but some number go with 3 unit progression so its half flat and half progression. But i cannot confirm anything as you know themselves they have not answered questions and dont speak at all actually.

@stephen i wonder can math also calculate how much its possible to get ahead maximum before loosing. I once was ahead that much if i would had played real casino i would had winning 40 years. If i had placed bigger unit stakes i would had got enough money to never play again, but i dont have that kind of luxury and evantually it all lost like predicted. Now after 1 year testing another method if i waited couple months of loosing streaks and start to play i got 1000 units after year. It had only 2 that kind of stretch in a year.