TurboGenius Note Keeping From Live Play

What formula do you use to calculate progression?

 

For those that use the race and lap analogy, remeber something that has hit 7x in the race may only be 2x ahead in the lap. Adjust your progression accordingly and save yourself a lot some bankroll.

 

Why would a number that's hit 7x be more likely to hit than a number that's only hit once on the next series of spins?

(Logic, it's always in the way.)

 

Odds always stay the same. 1 in 37 on a single zero wheel. Payout is still 1 in 35. No one ever argues that.

A number that has hit 7x will hit 8x. A number that has hit 1x will not hit 8x before going through 2x to 7x. Logic paves the way.

 

But a number that has only hit 1x may hit two more times before a number that has hit 7x hits 8x.

Understand?

 

Yes, I do understand. I may not be on that number regardless. I play a limited amount of the board so I may not be on that 1x number the entire game.
I play within the parameters of known results that will produce a likely outcome. "What happens has to happen" I make my profit and go on my way. Do you understand?

 

Since the number of pockets remains the same from one spin to the next, no number is more likely to hit than any other number on the next spin or the next series of spins.

 

There is no worse blind than the one who does not want to see

 

Do you, as an advantage player play the entire board? I don't think so. You play the area where there may be bias or dealer's signature or whatever. You limit the area, you limit the pockets. We do the same.

You have to get out of next spin mentality and look at the entire game. The game could be 2 spins, the game could be 200 spins. Within that range with by following what has to happen, will happen and that's how you profit. The amount of pockets don't matter. We don't use all of them, only the ones where an expected result has to happen.

 

There is no change in 37 spin cycles not in 100 and not 1000 spin cycles. There is no advantage in this... but dont take my word for it. You will find out the hard way, just like all the others who are silence now...

 

I have figured this out long ago by reading everything that Turbo has laid out on multiple forums. More importantly, I COMPREHENDED everything. I then did my own research. I didn't ask questions expecting everything to be spoon fed to me.

Every single person that does not have success with this, does not understand it. I have tried helping others with this however most have a mindset that limits their understanding or they end up corrupting the method with their own ideas and losing. Or they ask questions ad nauseum which have nothing to do with what is helping I ended up ignoring them. I'm sure Turbo is sick of the questions too. It's all here and other forums in black and white. Read it, again and again until you comprehend it, then you will see it work amazingly.

Applied correctly it wins.

 

Underrated movie with a sweet message.

 

80% could mean 2 down 8 up so overall up 6!

 

You wrote “There is no change in 37 spin cycles”, do you mean change or chance?
To get the bigger picture forget the word “cycles”, like Nimo said the session could be over in 2 spins or 200 spins. From 2 to 200 is variable aka future, too many variables in the equation and you’re done. Everything else has to be a constant (max. #’s, how long you bet on it, dropping/adding #’s), 6th-sense called it a framework.

 

So back to boxing, you can win a fight in the first round with a simple punch or you might need a knock-out in round 15. Pop-pop-Bam

 

Here's the thing ...

Tg coded his way
Nimo coded his way (or someone did for him)
Hal I'm not sure since he didn't brought it up
I coded my way ( yes , with help ).
Fossel
Celecliff
....

It wins !
Now go get them chips too

 

Still what was the point of doing these test then? It showed there is no difference...

 

If we have ( AND WE HAVE !!!!!!) an advantage...and nothing changes then it means we keep having these advantages don't we ? That means we can beat this game over and over again till we're grey and old and rich ( if we're lucky enough we don't get sick of course).

As long as repeats happen it can't lose. IT CAN'T LOSE. AGAIN....it can't lose

 

There's nothing there showing an edge. All I've seen are little short term samples of a few numbers here and there.

 

All I've seen from you are the same old things;

To many pockets

The payout is short

Tons of GIF's

Tons of arrows (up and down)

Every single math and fallacy question asked by TG deliberately not answered. And if you did answered it was with answers full of things that did anything except answering the question. (How convenient)

You didn't even try to think about a possible solution how to fix it . You tried asking a step by step guide that TG would never give . You then assumed you knew his system( like Bago did) and you did tons of simulations while haven't got a clue what he's actually doing. You weren't even capable of reverse-engineer his system and this with all your knowledge and experience . What's next ? Buuuuut Tg changed his method every single time . Here's where you underestimate TGs IQ I'm afraid. He's not stupid enough to make it that easy to figure it out. No matter HOW you slice the cake, it's STILL cake.

One thing very clear here : the fact that you're here and not in the AP section is to find innocent puppets to track your wheels . There's a s*cker born every minute and there's s*ckers who lose at this game every minute. Again how convenient for you...here you come to save the day . You even tried it with me ( remember? Didn't work did it lmao )

The same goes for Steve from rfcc. He claims he and his team tried and tested every possible way to beat this game . In conclusion it can't be done and how convenient he can push those (80k was it ?) computers in our face. Why people believe he and his team know everything about this game is beyond me . He offered 100k for a winning method lmao . Who would take 100k in exchange for a unlimited ATM method? If he offered 1 million ...grins

I'll say it again...roulette is beaten already. And yes by system/method players. The math of the game is easy . It doesn't require rocket science to figure it out. But first you need to actually try and figure it out . Progressions doesn't magically make losing method win but it does make complete sense when you know x is gonna happen.

And Ka2 with your coding abilities you'll get there. It might take awhile but you'll get one day