Roulette Figure it out

I think he means these, although he always said he had something better.
https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/a-very-good-repeater-hot-number-method-from-ken.9326/
https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/the-arizona-repeater-method-2.10257/

 

Correct >> my *FINAL* version is/was not posted.

Ken

 

It would be great to see that final version, but I know we'll never see it
If one day you decide to share, I will be very grateful!
I know and I trust that it must have something very good, it has been in this for many years.

Cheers

 

Thanks for the links Sergio.

 

I would encourage you to post it.
It does not matter if it works or not but we can prove it much faster if we all do the work.
That is the mindset we need to have.
Maybe the key to any repeater system is the gap/waiting time before we bet.

For example according to your system if we have 4 numbers to bet lets say we do not bet right away.
We wait for X spins and after that we start our betting.
I think this is what everyone who bother with the repeaters try to do, maybe i am wrong
but i do not see any other way for any repeater system to be profitable.

 

After having 4 repeats, if you look at the new repeats that are coming in and you count how many they have been, you will have several interesting answers. Try doing it with 12-18 turns or even more. Also try to count all the repetitions that come out without the spin limit and count how many new repetitions it takes 4 by 4 to have a third hit, that will also help you.

 

Did you find a way to make it profitable?
I run several tests and i try to find that sweet spot but so far nothing.

 

Probably not the way Mr. J. does it, but there are things that work quite regularly.
He takes many years ahead of me and focuses only on repeaters, I have been analyzing different forms for years and also those that I am creating with my colleagues.
What I am clear about is that online there is a lot of manipulation and it is very difficult, but in a physical casino it seems more stable.

 

There are trustworthy tables online for sure. In my opinion online we can check a strategy properly because we can see many spins.
In a B&M casino we have on average 30 spins per hour, online we can have 120 spins per hour.
This is the main reason B&M players believe that online something is wrong.

 

you missed this one sergio

https://www.rouletteforum .cc/index.php?topic=57.0

 

@Denzie Hi. i came to post here to avoid any misunderstandings. I was wondering about your style. is it 1 number or how much at the same time.
From messages in the past its difficult to understand as you were still trying to make it happen for yourself. Did you sticked with 100 session bankroll and doing 1 number til hit ?

 

The 1 number is just me guessing what number to play using the horse race with a positive progression if needed. We need a couple guesses right and we win with the progression. Shouldn't be a problem if the horses are were they should be. Most of the time there's no need for a progression

Now here....the method explained here (from TG) and even the links from Mr j are basically catching the same thing... fast repeats and throwing out numbers that stop hitting. Just mess around with it flat-betting and look how the hits come and don't come. Look at it .... once you see it , it will be clear why and when to use the progression.
Yesterday I played nearly 140 spins with only 6 hits. A very bad session, yet I came out winning.

Strange how this thread never caught on. Maybe because TG himself didn't post it. It's his though...

 

did you tested it on RNG also. I completed 100 sessions and had indentical results of yours with over 4000 unit profits, but when i went to rng i saw losses in row that never before. I never even saw back to back losses. next day i did another 50 session from live wheel history, which i dont trust actually. I once saw they manipulate and change results from history. If you start to play online do you bet immediately when looking at history to check the repeaters

In those 50 new sessions i saw only +182 units profit. Are these normal results and how many sessions you been grinding most to get back from losses. I saw up to over ten or so from todays 50 sessions

 

Hi Denzy! I don’t know if you can see my messages, but in general I have long wanted to write to you Thanks for appearing again in the fall, and since then you have been supporting the forum, and me in particular, with your messages about roulette, and even just about life , how you live it now, which motivates me even more. So Thank you.

I have long wanted to ask you about this thread, because lately you have raised many different topics, but not this one, although it was the last thing you wrote before your long absence.
When you first published it, I of course tested it a little, but overall it didn’t arouse my interest. And as I remember, only after 4 months I had something like an insights about this topic, I don’t remember what exactly, but that I needed to test it. And I tested this for about a year. Sometimes all day long for weeks. Sometimes after a long time only.
I really liked, and still like, this method. True, I didn’t make it a winning one. And as I wrote, I wanted to ask if you play this method, but I still couldn’t decide. But since the topic was raised, I decided to do it anyway.

What can I say, I don’t know how you choose numbers with this method, I tried to find my own way. But I never found a winning one. I came to the conclusion that with this method and my methods, you need to choose not only hot, but also cold numbers. I saw something like this later, when you were discussing with Gigi (by the way, in the end he no longer shows up))). I also tested with cold ones for a while, but then I eventually gave up for a long time and decided to switch to testing with a minimum interval. But, nevertheless, I always wanted to get into this method, but so far there was no inspiration. So you sometimes play using this method and it works for you?

 

denzie i have completed 16000 bets with many thousands of profit, but when i started real money testing it i see more losses and drawbacks. How many units exactly you have seen most setback ?

 

Now put the first post of "Adv of Repeaters part 1" next to this one and make the puzzle complete . Don't forget the progression.

 

Hi Denzie here is another example: I think what turbo shared can be applied to others ways also keeping the base concept!
Starting session:

34
32
1
33
2
13
18
6
28
37
10
35
34
----
33 (bet 33)
27
34
15
20
16
22
32
17
29
21
26
9
20 -13
----
24 (remove 33 , bet 24)
31
22
30
11 (bet24,11)
20
18
11 Win ( i reset her as in +)
----
Exmpl 2:

15
1
5
14
16
12
26
24
2
9
3
8
8
----
18
17
17
----
25
17 (bet 17)
12
12 -3
----
37
31 (remove 17 bet 31)
12 (bet 31,12)
25
14
7
29
5
3
4
35
12 ( i reset her as in +)

 

This is my favorite theme, which I have been testing for over a year. I liked her so much, now apparently I’ll have to do her again. And oh my god, there's that first part again. She almost drove me into depression last week because... I tested with it again all week and came to a very big dead end. Once again, it needs to be somehow applied to my favorite topic. Please no, not this. I'll go crazy soon.

On the other hand, remembering everything that I did, and what you did, or rather you do, telling in the first post, then don’t you already play like in the first part? And damn, I completely forgot that this is actually probably the best way to select reps.

 

If we put these two together, the other "horse racing" parts wouldn't matter then, so why would Turbo spend so much time on it?

 

Anyway, the differences between your post and adv repeaters part1:
- Turbo resets after any repeat win or lose, Denzie adds numbers and continuous
- Turbo bets new number after repeat, Denzie adds that repeat to his group

If I combine the two I'll often end up betting too many numbers (ok I can start dropping them off at some point), as in repeating number aka leader in 2x level and a new number after repeat aka leader in this now fresh race at 1x.