Roulette Figure it out

Unless you're suggesting we do this (numbers from Turbo example)

#12 - we play it.
#28 -
#6 -
#8 -
#36 -
#4 -
#9 -
#24 -
#1 -
#33 -
#13 -
#14 -
#11 -
#17 -
#14 - a repeat and we lost as we were on 12. -14 units

#23 - we play it plus the 14 repeat from last round
#25
#4
#27
#0
#15
#14 - WIN +10 profit at this point, we drop 14 keep on 23
#28
#32
#21
#20
#24
#36
#28 a repeat and a loss , still +3 profit. Drop 23 start on 28
Start again tracking reoeat
#15 - playing it plus 28
#34
#27
#24
#6
#34 a repeat and a loss (our balance is -8).We drop 15 but keep 28 and add 34
Start again
#33 - playing it with other two
#31
#2
#25
#15
#8
#35
#11
#10
#25 a repeat and a loss, drop 33 ads 25 to 28 and 34 (-37u)
Start again
#10 - playing it with others
#2
#3
#29
#35
#8
#23
#3 a repeat and a loss,drop 10, add 3 to other repeats (-68)
Start again
#33 - playing it with other repeats
#16
#1
#6
#22
#36
#20
#32
#0
#35
#35 a repeat and a loss, drop 33 add 35 (-127)
Start again
#4 - playing it with 35, 3, 25, 28, 34
#36
#35 - WIN , we're still in a loss (-106)
#1
#17
#27
#12
#34 - WIN (-100)
#5
#2
#18
#31
#2 a repeat add it to your bet (-136)
Start again
#25 - WIN (-107)
#6
#2 - WIN (-85)
#16
#12
#32
#19
#31
#25 WIN (-91)
Start again
#6 - playing it
#29
#25 - WIN (-76)
#35 - WIN (-47)
#20
#13
#14
#19
#35 WIN (-54 forgot to count playing 6 earlier)
Start again as it was a repeat within that round
#7 - playing it
#14
#18
#35 - WIN (-53)
#13
#34 - WIN (-33)
#28 - WIN (-5)
#2 - WIN (+23 new high, drop all numbers but current round #7)
#26
#12
#22
#11
#5
#7 - a repeat and a WIN , final balance (+53 flat betting)

 

I'm probably little bit off with running balance as doing it on the phone, but one could also drop repeats playing last 3 (sort of your top3) and the current round number that'd also end positively.

 

Programmed the above... will not work same results as random comparing a random stream.

I dont know the puzzle but If A. (the above algorithm) is the same as a random stream B. Then C alone should make the difference. Because there is no difference between A. and B. So both could be injected into C.

 

El mismo acertijo, levadura y dos pizcas de sal.

 

Looks like those 2 pinches of salt is hard to find

 

Me costó Denzie, mucho pero cuando las encuentras es como tocar el cielo.

 

I would say it is hard to find @Denzie considering you spent years working on this. And others are still working on it.

 

Several years ago (2018) I was in talks with a few people and they sent me some material. Apparently Turbo had posted some crucial information about his method including a graph and the spins. He did delete it, but not before people saved the information. I was sent a comprehensive file documenting every number he bet, the betting amount and why it was bet. This was included in one of the sessions:



I was able to recreate this graph and betting amounts perfectly. Unfortunately I tested many other sessions with the spreadsheet and the system is a long term loser.

 

Nice Shaun.
Any chance of posting the stream of numbers

 

Quick one for you @Denzie that I might have asked before does way you play work flat but because you want to maximise your gains you use prog or it needs prog to profit consistently?

 

Hay una publicación antigua de Denzie que hablaba sobre rejillas y rayos que golpeaban esas rejillas y cosas locas. búscalo y léelo hasta que tus ojos se cansen.

 

¿Alguien sabe de que publicación se trata o donde encontrarla?.
La cuestion es que ¿a que os referis con "dos pizcas de sal"?

Gracias

 

So here is one question for you @Denzie and others that "figured it out" (I am mostly interested in Denzies answer though as maybe I am getting closer to a solution), would you take a loss on this session (spin txt attached)

 

Those two pinches of salt, do they refer to two more numbers bet? That would make the top 3 that Nimo mentions within each cycle of the first repeater. The tests that I have attached on 100 flat bet microgames resulted in +60 units. Although, it could be a coincidence.

 

Gigi can you explain why a loss , you have three stage winners there?

 

3X, 4X are winners according to the players, 5X and 6X are sure hits.

 

I can win flat-betting but that's to slow profit wise...

A progression is to maximize gains and not to get out the hole

 

No need to answer @Denzie , I probably got it wrong. What you could if you don't mind, say is what makes it a losing session for you, like no 4x by spin 50 or a repeat on leader at some spin count threshold, as we cant play indefinitely even with a positive prog.

 

its exactly how i played too but evantually i lost. i think its best to describe your normal session and strategy. im not sure about all the secrecy people do. Casinos will not be removed anyway and it still takes discipline to follow your path even if you know every step what to do and lot of effort.
if you still win like this how many units has been maximum drawback with how many online wheel sessions. i saw good results also with simulator but online real wheel is something different somehow

 

i think he stoped at 2 or 3 units positive progression and maximum spins around within 32-72 or so win or loss. thats how i tried