TurboGenius R-sim

40 spins had 17 repeats last 2 spins repeats. But spin 41 another non-hit in 3 spins, it's known average.


Can not spoon feed you; you need to study just like RR

 

And r-sim is trustworthy. Its just some programmer making money off ads with a dodgy roulette game attached. Go to a casino and test your system out, you'll probably have better luck.

 

OK, please keep your charts off the RR thread. They may make sense to you, but not to me. I'm interested in the top three hottest numbers and the secret that I discovered from Turbo. It makes perfect sense to me. I saw it and understood it right away. I wish I knew it all the way back in 1993. Your stuff is not about the best hot number hunting topic. So it tends to be off topic in the RR thread. I do want to thank you for trying though. It's clearly the drugs. I can't make sense of anything right now. Maybe someday after I get off of them. Thanks for trying. You put in a lot of effort.

 

Playing for repeats using riddles.
Testing on R-sim and MPR. Both are RNG. MPR definitely is harder to use; supposedly using random org numbers.
Now trying to replicate Turbo's opening post in Adv 3, the unbelievable excel; like all his excel sheets. Too good to be true. That's my opinion.
But, now after days and plenty of played rated games; R-sim does not give matches like Turbo showed.
Yes games gave 0-2-1-2-2-3-2-2-1-3 for example. Now I'm getting all to often 1-0-1-1-1-2-3-1-1. Just seems strange too have changed so much.
Using the same layout for the stream of numbers using different ways of play, still get less matches appearing.
Does this mean its no better betting for repeats as betting for non-hit?
If matches are good over the stream, to me it means the opening 37 non-hit are hitting slow. But if the matches are bad more 1matches the non-hits are hitting fast. This shows using repeats average for 60 spins, that is 1-3-5 -7 and 30 at 60th spin. The average is showing repeats are bad for each group of 10 spins. But after 40 spins where can be as much as -5 for repeats. The repeats over spins 41 to 60 get close to the average of 30 repeats from the starting 37 non-hit.

 

So 34 spins +124 Good enough to stop. Remember denzie +100

If carry on; but not using top3 using just 5 numbers. What happens. The tracking will show the stream and top 3

 

shows 40 spins the starting 37 were +1. 25/40. So 15 repeats.
spin 50 have 30 of the starting 37.
60 spins and 32 of the starting 37 have hit. Only 28 repeats, repeats -2 to the average of 30/30
The #36 went 2x-17 not showing.
Profit all gone.
Matches looking ok. with 6 numbers

 

236 spins.

Remember only using 5 numbers

Was it better to carry on?
Should I have used top3?
But the 5 numbers now are 4-23-15-7-5
It's all about the staking.

 

There are 7 top 3 numbers.
With 5 numbers; +129
From above better to stop or might need another 200 plus spins.

 

10 numbers 136. Lap 1 finished in 128 spins.
spin 22; +151
Decided to go for 10% of starting bank. Job done.

AGAIN PISS POOR FOR MATCHES.

 

This top 3 had all excited, but as posts show it is not so hot.
Where are the top 3?

Okay #15 had +80. Now where have top 3 gone? Ka2 is going to say sleep.

 

Well, 79 spins and top 3. Need to assess the stream. Well there is a choice of 9 top3.
Matches n/a-1-1-2-2
So, +80 looked good.
Got +111.
Remember Ka2 someone said testing you miss how the stream is building.
Some don't need to code, think it was HAL.

 

You are just winging it! Adjust the rules when you are going along the "stream". You know what it is called? ... gambling...

Come back with clear rules, and I'll do you a favor and program it for you...

 

That's the point Karl you can't read a stream. So, go start at Winkles GUT and see what the starting 37 want to do.

 

Karl not to hard was it.


I suppose between 3 hours and 5 hours I lost

 

What is that riddle, oh yeah I wouldn't be betting them

 

I dont think you understand. Without PROPER rules that are CLEAR and TRANSPARANT you are just gambling...

 

Karl I think I understand. Karl where are you when you are posting ? The Gambling Forum.
You, like the DSAA can't bet, as you are testing forever; so have you ever placed a bet? and the Dr is spending his time collecting numbers from highly maintained wheels.

Oh I guess you are hoping someone will lay it out for you as you can't see what TG has shown in his opening excel in ADV:3
Don't come and clutter up R-sim, you'll not get help from me.

 

So pathetic that part. . Why you post your useless graphs when you are not willing to help?

 

Lol!!! I dont want your help, I was trying to help you