Roulette RNG roulette

Hello. I would like to open a discussion on RNG roulette. Have any of you tried out some systems that can beat it? I tried some, had limited success but I am still trying to find the right approach.
Please share your thoughts. We can exchange information.

 

If it's random.. I don't feel like it could be beaten.. human error/human repetition is key in physical roulette..

 

But even the randomness of RNG is governed by algorithms that run the RNG. There should be some statistical bias in the number pattern that one can exploit. Do you know anyone who tried to beat RNG? I've seen there are some guys here posting their systems. I have to look more into that.

 

I played 99% on FOBT the 1% was odd occasions at B+M spins.
So it made it a waiting game. Miss 2 spins its average to hit and start betting. How often did I get to bet?
So in blue is max length to hit.
Now years go by and I have seen 27 non-hit numbers take 7 spins; So what I learnt from collecting a minimum of 60 spins, depended on whether I had a profit I could have say 100 or +100 spins.
Now this data was for UK betting shop, with FOBT machine regulated by gaming commission.
Years back over at RF a member asked what the data was about. I said the loaded file was about how fast on the FOBT the starting 37 non-hits, hit.
Well this member who made contact from PM; just disappeared from the RF forum never to be heard or seen again.
Was he from the UK bookmakers?
Anyway, What was showing was in blocks of 10 spins was how the non-hit; hit. Up to the 19th non-hit they averaged too hit in 2 spins. Then up to the 26th non-hit they averaged to hit 3 spins. Then up to the 30th non-hit they averaged to hit in 4 spins.
Now the pain in the arse was length of repeats. The terminal allowed using .20p units. Could bet 27 non-hits for 3 spins. Now remember the average here is 2 spins. Well before long it would occasionally take 4 spins. Its max back in 2002 was 5 .

In KTF topic that is about non-hits at RF forum on bottom of page 80 you might still be able to download Priyanka's tester. It shows how the non-hits in blocks of 10 spins.
The average for the non-hit are 9-7-5-3. That is 24 non-hits in 40 spins. Also it shows at 60th spin how many of the starting 37 have hit. On average you have 29.5 round up, 30; that is on average half the 60 spins, non-hit and the other 30 are repeats.
So, it is obvious that repeat average is 1-3-5-7 ;16 repeats over 40 spins. And 30 repeats at 60th spin.
On this forum is the biggest known troll with an unknown amount of AKA's is Dr Sir anyone. He posted at RF forum 10'330 live spins, not that many agreed. But these 10'330 spins gave the non-hit average, the 9-7-5-3 and 30.
Also he champions random org; that also shows the non-hit average.
Ignatus posts Live German spins and guess what the non-hit average shows.
Plus over 1'000 aired on UK tv games of air ball spins; the non-hit average.
So, you have 2 ways of observing spins. Keep track of non-hit and you might see the opportunity to bet for repeat. What if 1st 9 numbers are all non-hit and even the TG, Genius says average is 9 spins, you might fancy betting for the repeat.
Let's not get into the top 3 his advantage for repeats.
Remember this all came from using a FOBT (RNG)

 

It’s interesting to see how you've tracked and analyzed spin outcomes over time. The concept of tracking non-hits and repeats, especially in blocks of 10 spins, seems like a practical way, though the unpredictability of RNG will always add some uncertainty. Your experiences with FOBT machines and the use of Priyanka’s tester add an intriguing dimension to this discussion. What is your success rate on the long run using this approach?

 

Has anyone else done some serious work on RNG roulette? I don't think it's impossible to gain advantage on RNG. Maybe it's simpler that with live roulette, where you have to find wheel bias and have a very good computer to do the fast calculation on bet placement.