Baccarat The Very Near Perfect System

Kindly provide me with some examples when you have spare time
Highly appreciated !

 

Interesting.. I'm impressed a lot of time went into this.

 

Are you using the 1 2 loop or are you using half units at the moment?

If you are using the 1 2 loop can you replay this shoe and just let me know if you could score similar results?

I'm replaying an old shoe by Norm in which he scored +15 at hand 58 using the 1 2 loop.

B214113125

11112511111121

231435

No need to post the play by play if you decide to look this shoe over; I'm just curious if you can follow his reasoning better than I can, thanks.

YZL[/QUOTE]

Hi YZL,
It scored 17 flat betting and 24 units if I would have used a 1,2 loop, never betting 2 units untill I won the 1 unit bet.
I also posted the big road of the shoe

 

Thank so you much for posting a play by play CT; can you clarify your reasoning for making the bets betting opposite the banker for hands 23, 34, 48, 52, and 53?

 

Sure

H23 I bet opposite because prior to the 5 in a row (iar) on banker we had 2 isolated 1s on the banker side which means banker was in “opposite” mode. I consider the 5iar the “finale” on the banker side and treat it like an anomaly. I basically went with what the banker was doing (the mode/opposites) prior to the 5iar.

H34, Looking back, after the last 4iar and 5iar on the Banker side there were 2 banker opposites both times. I was just following the pattern. The justification is it already happened twice so I am expecting it to happen again the same way for the 3rd time.

H48 Kind of same reasoning as Hands 23 and 34. The banker is clearly in opposite mode. I assumed the likelihood of a banker opposite was stronger than the likelihood of a banker multiple. I was wrong.

H52 If you look at that entire section starting with H38, you have a ratio of 7 repeats to 2 opposites. Also affecting my decision was that on player I had repeats (multiples) 2 out of the last 3 times, which to me puts it more into “repeat” mode than “opposite” mode. I based my decision on the bias of the entire section, which was repeats.

H53 Again, I based my decision on overwhelming repeats in a small section. I was confident the player wasn’t going to stop at 2 and that it would go to at least a 3iar.

 

Thank you for clarifying CT; I was paying attention to the B strong side I didn't even notice that.

 

dear natan you are a genius.

 

Dear ND, Please give me an example when you have spare time, thanks in advance..

 

Dear ND, Please give me an example when you have spare time, thanks in advance..

 

He can't as any single bet is involving either an edge or not, not caring a fkng bit about how much is the actual bet amount.
Otherwise progressive betting methods would have beaten the game centuries ago and it hadn't happened.

The only way to get ahead of the game is finding a method capable to win by flat betting, MM is just an illusion as Imagination's song.

as.

 

@ vindan,

I am not teaching systems and do mot give graphic details about their method of play.

 

Yes, emphasis on "he can't"

 

Those two cats do not know the issue but know all the answers . ROFL.

 

Your approach loses to streaks. No good.

 

What system are you referring to? I never posted a gambling system.

 

Those Bacc cats are losers and blaming anything within sight for their blunders and greed .

 

The baccarats is NOT a streaky game so no sense in playing scared of the streak, hey hey.

 

Remember the Frank Barstow principle ?

 

Many of you on here truly provide so much good information. Had to give a bump. Thank you for this.

 

LMAO

If you say so.

This place is DEAD.