Roulette ROLLER...

The """I AM COVERING OVER HALF OF THE ZEROS in my strategy.""" that you are saying I know exactly what you mean ...
When zero happens ... you are taking it as 1 new step and you proceed to the next trigger.... Meaning that zero is taking a place in the Rolling triggers.
I have tested your bet in 60 K by both ways.
1) Zero completely IGNORED
2) Zero taking a spot in the triggers

Both ways are losing

 

So how am I over 3000 units up. You people and your bots never prove anything. And neverwill.

Bots are for lazy people. In the REAL world we put in the HOURS and attain real results Thats how winning is done.

 

So its the 5th time that u admit I have found your bet

 

You need to find a work ethic. And actually play the strategy. How about that.

 

Playing or testing is the same and you know it.
The test was made only on real wheel spins.
Hit and run will not make any diference if a bet has a negative long run expectation.

Congrats on finding some thing that beats variarnce on the long run IF zeros did not exist In roulette.
But unfortunately zero do exist so its useless

 

@Boukit well, if it's a losing thing ... i don't see any problem, whoever the coder is, to extend the results of the test

also, on the other forum you boasted how you decoded charles' cumuiative-bet & it being a winner ... was that a trap, & it doesn't really work

@6th-sense you said not to dismiss him & mentioned schooling ... in matters of betting, or proving the bet works, or ...

@atrox23 have you coded this? sounds pretty straightforward, not much in terms of complexity & exceptions

@Sentinel 1 rather than the summary, why don't you just post the actual performance with spin-numbers ... instead ...................

 

I told you the zero does not draw down to enough degree to hurt the system. Take SET 23. After 72 games. I have had 32 ZEROS. 20 of them have hit on STEP 1 of the bets for both P7 and P8. Of the 12 that didnt. Only 4 caused an actual drawdown. The 20 wins more than took care of that. And I post My Bankroll growing. It will start to register. ROLLER is the ONE.

 

thereddiamanthe you have missed a lot of posts I guess.
That s why your questions are not valid

 

I have already answered this and your bet is losing no matter how you treat zero
Infact by Ignoring zero as a rolling trigger ... the bet won more

 

Because im only concerned about the SET as a whole. Stop being gamblers and START being investors. Ive gone to bed on a losing day. 4 losing days. I have yet to go to bed on a LOSING SET.

This the crucial part none of you are getting. Maybe its asking too much. B

Impossible. You have tested nothing and just exposed yourself as a liar.

 

You have already admit 5 times that i have found your secret bet.
So you know I m telling the truth In every thing I Post.

 

I cant admit anything to someone like you. You are too lazy to take seriously. Play for REAL or dont play at all.

 

You would not advice me to play it for real if you had not seen that I had your bet (i posted it to you in your email).
So its the 6th time addmitting I have found your bet

 

As Winner said SHOW OR GO.

 

You Addmitting 6 times that I have it... Show it all

 

@Boukit all questions are valid still standing

if this roller bet was coded, by whomever whatever his name is, & doesn't work ... I don't see any reason against the coder approving it for posting.

otherwise, without the full-play test results, it's all just words & constant hype, worth nothing, hitting with a hand in a barrel of water.

so, did you code the roller, even if by proxy?


@Sentinel 1 i get it, game vs set

it's basically a case of runs (multiple games) till positive, however many required ... althpugh you standardized the latter as fixed-set of 100-games

however, your decision to post as such = summary, is the whole crux of the hype, the source (maybe you want it, intended?)

now see my point ... no point cutting hydras heads spawning over & over again, if you can dry it lifting it out of the water, dealing with it at the source ... by posting spin-by-spin performance

if all's in the open, all system ruke posted & known ... other than you either don't have it coded, or do not have records of play ... i don't see why not

it ain't about you & how the roller serves you, it's about even removing the questions to form & the need to answer any of them in turn, by simply having the details in the open unequivocally


now, if neither of you gets what i am saying, i have no time to deal with this any further

 

there's another option, that you are both in it, in tandem ... & it's in your interest to keep this drama going

 

Dont be crazy after today I will only post results and anwser questions from people who want to learn something. There will be zero back and fortth with the court Jester Boukit. And the small dog Roulette Tools. He thought he was running this forum with his strategy. He didnt like it when the big dog arrived.

Lets watch this grow.

 

The big dog arrived hahahaha
Your sick need for attention is unbeatable
Trolls are small... Not big

 

You will understand in a few months. Bankrolls dont grow themselves.