Roulette ROLLER...

that way works also if i only play one game at a time table to table ?

 

There are many ways you can do this. You can bring H/L and O/E into it aswell. if you cannot wait. I will continue as I play it. The results have been stellar. Maybe you and personal. Have found a way to make it work in a real walk in casino. Well done for that if you have. Now start making some MONEY.

 

Hi sentinel!! Is it correct?

 

I'm still confused hahaha !!

 

Evening Quos,

Yes youve got it.

 

Hey Tools,

I thought diamanthe had got to you.

You have a killers system already Tools. I see you got under someone elses skin on here.

 

Hi @WeWillWin
I don't quite understand what you are proposing, can you explain it with an example?

 

Hi @PersonS ,
Have you performed any further tests? What results did you get?

 

Hi Quos.
No, I didn't go any further. I tried a few games of baccarat, randomly, and the runs were similar.

 

Youve got to play 10 SETS (1000) Games minimum. Before you can draw any concrete conclusions. I have 2340 real GAMES played. Thats where my utter confidence in ROLLER is born from. Its impossible for me to ever go into the red at this point. Over 3200 UNITS in profit.

I would love for even one of you to embrace it fully and have even half the success. Then you will know all the mathematicians have been wrong all these years.

 

Hello, Quos.

In my previous post, I explained how the first three numbers from which you start recording affect the performance of the Roller.

For example, consider the following numbers:
8
19
1

If you start recording from number 8, you'll get RRR+BRR at spin 33, and P8 will appear at spin 44.
If you start from number 19, you'll get BRR+BBR at spin 18, and P8 will show up at spin 52.
If you start from number 1, you'll get RRR+RRB at spin 44, and P8 will appear at spin 63.

Do you see the difference? You need three different starting points because you're using a pattern made up of three parts.

 

i won, but its illusion. i did math wrong. i calculated everything again and these zeros are still wiping profit away 0,2 and 0.5 unit on zero are still every game at stake and by the end of 100 games you loose more then winning 140 units. Math is still against us even if we dont think about it.
I try again with some nuances. For roulette player its still fun method. Its more complete then your previous strategies

 

you described in your profile your sport bettor also. How to apply something this into there, because there its possible actually to have edge over the game

 

No Mansi Like I said PLAY 10 SETS for REAL. The zero wins on STEP 1 will negate the losses on mostly STEP 3. And when you have the monster sets 170 units plus you have gone clear completely. If this was some illusion I would be living under a bridge. This is my LIVING. Not some maybe it works strategy.

 

Where do you live?

 

Hello,
Thanks Sentienelle for sharing.
I'm trying your technique with small units (€1).
It takes a long time to do a full series: I'm up to 25 sessions.
I'm playing as you indicated by covering the zero at step 1 of P7 and P8 (0.1), but I'm also covering the zero at step 3 of P8 (0.3).
The beginnings were encouraging; I reached +36 units in session number 10, but since then, I've had a big drop, and I'm down to -38 units.
I'm going to continue, but I'm a little discouraged. I've never had a big rally: my maximum is 6 in P7 and 14 in P8, but most of the time P7 comes out in 1 or 2 and P8 in 4 or 5.
I'll keep you posted

 

i try to put on zero p7 step 1 and on b bet on p8. Total twice only
im actually in profit in live wheel testing. Most is if you do following 2 on colour 1 zero. Try testing if like this you get many times more profit. If 500 drawdown for you meant 50 units, then it that sense my results are identical to yours, but this rng is fooling my results. i cant test there
im in europe.

 

Hi @WeWillWin, Ok. Thank you for answering. I understand what you mean. In this case, starting point number two was the most beneficial.
But how do you apply this in the game? A priori, you don't know which of the three starting points is going to be the most beneficial.
Do you think that the starting point that first crosses out 6 of the 8 patterns is the one that performs the best?

 

Mansi Ive said this a million times. An RNG is NOT ROULETTE. Airball or live dealer only

 

What are you playing on? You have to play 10 sets Tom. Whats gonna happen on here is one of you will get that rare negative set. Then tell me it doesnt work. Look through my charts. SET 8. I finished with PLUS 26. Now look at my FIRST SET. Plus 234. Now imagine SET 8 had been my FIRST SET. I may never have carried on. Thats why I say youve got to play 10 sets. 1000 games. Then you will see. It can vary alot. When you hit that 30 plus set you will know.